The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using ecl plus chemiluminescence substrate

1

Western Blot Analysis of HNC-TICs Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proteins of HNC-TICs were extracted using RIPA buffer. Samples were boiled and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. The proteins were wet transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL, USA). After blocking, the membranes were incubated with appropriate primary antibodies against Snail, ZEB1, vimentin, Slug, or E-cadherin followed by corresponding secondary antibodies. The immunoreactive bands were developed using the ECL-plus chemiluminescence substrate (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and detected by ImageQuant LAS 4000 Mini (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The detailed information of antibodies are listed below (Table 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoblotting Protein Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed with NP-40 lysis buffer, and protein concentration was determined by BCA protein assay reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL). A total of 25 μg of total protein were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerca, MA). Protein detection was conducted by the SignalBoostTM Immunodetection Enhancer kit (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer's recommendation. Briefly, the primary antibody was diluted with a primary antibody solution and incubated with the PVDF membrane at 4°C overnight. After washing with 0.1% Tween-20 in a Tris buffer solution, the membrane was incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with a secondary antibody that was diluted with secondary antibody buffer. The signals were developed using an ECL-plus chemiluminescence substrate (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA) and captured using a LAS-1000plus Luminescent Image Analyzer (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). The band intensity was quantified using Bio1D software (Vilber Lourmat, Marne-la-Vallée, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of NLRP3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Western blot test was carried out in accordance to the procedure formerly described.42 (link) Primary antibodies used included anti-human NLRP3 (sc-134306; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, USA) and anti–GAPDH (AB2302, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) was used as loading control. Following blocking, the membranes were incubated with indicated primary antibodies fsollowed by corresponding secondary antibodies. The immunoreactive bands were generated with an ECL-plus chemiluminescence substrate (PerkinElmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and taken with ImageQuant LAS 4000 Mini (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA). Each densitometric value was expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Phospho-p65

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Western blot test was carried out in accordance with the procedure previously described [62 (link)]. Antibodies to phospho-p65 markers (p-p65) were employed as primary antibodies. Primary antibodies used included antibodies to phospho-p65 markers (1:500; cat. no. sc-134306; mouse monoclonal) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA, and anti-GAPDH (Millipore, Bedford, MD, USA) was used as the loading control. Following blocking, the membranes were incubated with indicated primary antibodies followed by corresponding secondary antibodies. The immunoreactive bands were generated with an ECL-plus chemiluminescence substrate (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and taken with ImageQuant LAS 4000 Mini (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Each densitometric value was expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of EMT Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in NP-40 buffer and protein concentration was determined using BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Samples were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and wet-transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerca, MA, USA) followed by incubation with primary antibodies against E-cadherin (Santa Cruz. Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA; 1:500), vimentin (Santa Cruz; 1: 500), FN-1 (Santa Cruz; 1: 500), SNAIL1 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danver, MA, USA; 1: 500), TWIST (GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA; 1: 500), ZEB1(Santa Cruz; 1: 500) or GAPDH (GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA; 1: 5000). After incubation with corresponding secondary antibodies, the immunoreactive bands were developed using an ECL-plus chemiluminescence substrate (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and captured by LAS-1000 plus Luminescent Image Analyzer (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) [55 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Molecular Characterization of Fibrosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to the PVDF membrane (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL, USA) by a wet-transfer. Membranes were probed with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies used included anti-α-SMA (Cat. #A5228), anti-COL1A1 (Cat. #C2456), anti-Smad2, and anti-phosphorylated Smad2 (Cat. #ZRB04953) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Following incubation of primary antibodies, the membranes were rinsed three times and incubated with corresponding secondary antibodies. The immunoreactive bands were developed using an ECL-plus chemiluminescence substrate (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and detected by the LAS-1000 plus Luminescent Image Analyzer (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

CCNG2 Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell protein extraction and immunoblotting analysis were conducted to examine the expression of CCNG2 as previously described [51 (link)]. Th sample was boiled and separated on 10% SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred to PVDF membrane (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL, USA) by wet-transfer. The immunoreactive bands were developed using an ECL-plus chemiluminescence substrate (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and captured by LAS-1000 plus Luminescent Image Analyzer (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Mammospheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mammospheres were collected by centrifugation and lysed in M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Pirece Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Then 20 μg of total protein were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P, Merck Millipore). The membrane was then blocked with 5% skimmed milk (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in Tris buffered slaine (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 0.05% Tween-20 (Sigma-Aldrich) (TBS-T) at room temperature for 1 h followed by incubation with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. After washing with TBS-T, the membrane was then incubated with peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at room temperature for one hour. The signals were developed by ECL-plus chemiluminescence substrate (PerkinElmer) and captured using a Luminescent Image Analyzer (Fusion SOLO, Vilber Lourmat, Marne-la-Vallée, France). The band intensity was quantified using ImageJ software (version 1.48a, NIH, Bethesda. MA, USA, 2013).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunoblot Analysis of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in NP-40 buffer and protein concentration was determined using BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Samples (25 μg of total protein) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and wet-transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerca, MA, USA). The membrane was incubated with primary antibodies recognizing Oct4 (#2750, Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA), Nanog (#3850, Cell Signaling), Sox2 (#3579, Cell Signaling) or GAPDH (GTX627408, GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA). Following primary antibodies, the membrane was incubated with corresponding secondary antibodies. The immunoreactive bands were developed using an ECL-plus chemiluminescence substrate (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and captured by LAS-1000 plus Luminescent Image Analyzer (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed with NP-40 lysis buffer, and protein concentration was determined by BCA protein assay reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA). A total of 25 μg of total protein were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Billerca, MA, USA). Protein detection was conducted by the SignalBoost™ Immunodetection Enhancer kit (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendation. Briefly, the primary antibody was diluted with a primary antibody solution and incubated with the PVDF membrane at 4°C overnight. After washing with 0.1% Tween-20 in a Tris buffer solution, the membrane was incubated for 1 hr at room temperature with a secondary antibody that was diluted with secondary antibody buffer. The signals were developed using an ECL-plus chemiluminescence substrate (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and captured using a LAS-1000plus Luminescent Image Analyzer (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The band intensity was quantified using Bio1D software (Vilber Lourmat, Marne-la-Vallée, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!