The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

37 protocols using genescreen plus

1

In Vitro Transcription of Pseudouridine RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pGEM3Zf (+) plasmid (Promega) was linearized with Hind III and used as a template for in vitro transcription of a random 56 nt RNA using the HyperScribe T7 High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit (K1047-25, APExBIO). RNA ±pseudoUTP was transcribed in the presence of either UTP or pseudo-UTP (B7972, APExBIO). The transcribed RNA was DNase treated, acid phenol:chloroform extracted, and precipitated to remove DNA and unincorporated NTPs. The RNA was spotted onto GeneScreen Plus (NEF988001, PerkinElmer) and cross-linked to the membrane using a UV Stratalinker 2400 (Stratagene). The membrane was probed with the primary anti-Pseudouridine mAb (D347-3, MBL) in TBS+0.1% Tween, washed and probed with anti-mouse IgG-Peroxidase (A9044, SIGMA) secondary antibody. The membranes were then incubated with a luminol-based enhanced chemiluminescent (ECL) substrate and signals visualized using a G:Box imaging system (Syngene). RNA integrity was visualized by Ethidium Bromide staining of the RNA after electrophoresis on a Criterion 10% TBE Urea Gel (345008, Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

FOSL1 Genomic DNA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated and analyzed by our standard published procedures from each of the cell lines (10 (link)). In brief, 10 μg of genomic DNA from each cell line was digested with appropriate restriction enzyme. The digested DNAs were loaded and separated on a 0.8% agarose gels (Seakem, FMC Bioproducts, Rockland, MD), transferred to nylon membranes (Gene Screen Plus, Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA) and hybridized to random primed 32P-labeled probes of FOSL1 cDNA. After hybridization and washing, the blots were wrapped and exposed to Kodak film. Restriction length polymorphisms were analyzed either visually or scanned and analyzed with Image J software (28 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Northern Blot Analysis of FOSL1 mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using Tri-Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) from each of the cell lines by our published methods (10 (link)). RNA was loaded at 15 μg per lane and separated on a standard Northern gel. After transfer to a nylon membrane (Gene Screen Plus, Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA) the membranes were hybridized with 32P-labeled FOSL1 cDNA. After hybridization and washing, the Northern blots were wrapped and exposed to Kodak film (Kodak X-OMAT AR). The FOSL1 mRNA in each lane/cell line were analyzed either visually or scanned and analyzed with Image J software (28 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Muscle Differentiation via miRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from MEF or HEK 293 cells using Trizol (Life technologies) 48 hrs after transfection. For C2C12 cells, RNA was Trizol extracted after each day of differentiation for 5 days. Expression of miR-133a, a marker of muscle differentiation44 (link), was monitored to validate the differentiation to myotubes.
For small RNA northerns, ten micrograms of total RNA was electrophoresed on 15% (w/v) acrylamide/7M urea gel and transferred onto a Gene screen Plus (Perkin Elmer) membrane. Hybridization was done overnight in Perfect Hyb Plus (Sigma) buffer at 65°C using LNA probes for miR-151-5p and miR-124 (Exiqon) or at 35°C with an oligonucleotide probe (IDT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measuring Muscle Differentiation via miRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from MEF or HEK 293 cells using Trizol (Life technologies) 48 hrs after transfection. For C2C12 cells, RNA was Trizol extracted after each day of differentiation for 5 days. Expression of miR-133a, a marker of muscle differentiation44 (link), was monitored to validate the differentiation to myotubes.
For small RNA northerns, ten micrograms of total RNA was electrophoresed on 15% (w/v) acrylamide/7M urea gel and transferred onto a Gene screen Plus (Perkin Elmer) membrane. Hybridization was done overnight in Perfect Hyb Plus (Sigma) buffer at 65°C using LNA probes for miR-151-5p and miR-124 (Exiqon) or at 35°C with an oligonucleotide probe (IDT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Northern Blot Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was purified as described [102 (link)]. For blotting, 5 and 10 μg of total RNA were separated in 1% denaturing agarose gel, transferred to nylon membrane (GeneScreen Plus; Perkin-Elmer), UV cross-linked, baked and hybridized at 42°C overnight with random primed 32P-DNA fragments of genes of interest. Hybridization solution was 5X Denhardt’s, 5X SSC, 50% formamide, 0.2% SDS, 5 mM EDTA, 100 μg/ml total yeast RNA (Baker’s yeast, Sigma). Quantitation was by PhosphorImager FLA-3000 (Fuji Film). For sequential probings, signal was stripped, monitored for loss of 32P before next probing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Northern Blot Analysis of RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were denatured at 65°C for 8 min in buffer containing MOPS, formamide, and formaldehyde, and electrophoresed on 1% (reaper) or 0.8% (hid) agarose with MOPS buffer as described (Rio et al., 2011 ).
RNA was transferred from the gel to a nylon membrane (GeneScreen Plus, PerkinElmer) using capillary transfer in transfer buffer (10X SSC) overnight. Transfer membranes were rinsed briefly in 2X SSC and UV crosslinked using a Stratalinker (254 mm; 1200 mJ), followed by baking at 80°C for 1 hr. Membranes were pre-hybridized with a mix containing 15% formamide, 10 mg/mL BSA, 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 1 mM EDTA, 7% SDS with rocking at 42°C (Rio et al., 2011 ). After 2–4 hr, buffer was replaced and probes were added. After overnight hybridization, the membranes were washed in 0.5 X SSC and 0.1% SDS, dried, and visualized by phosphorimaging (Typhoon 9400, GE Healthcare). Images were quantitated using ImageQuant TL 8.1 (GE Healthcare). The details of this protocol are as described (Rio et al., 2011 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

BAC Clones Southern Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BAC clones were digested with SalI and NotI, and fragments were separated by gel electrophoresis and transferred to a GeneScreen Plus hybridization membrane (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) by capillary blotting [35 (link),54 ]. The filter was evaluated with 32P-riboprobes generated with RNA polymerases from linearized gene clones that served as templates to incorporate 32P labeled ribonucleotides as described in [23 (link),35 (link),55 (link)]. The gene clones chosen for templates had an A6 element pattern (GenBank accession number EF607716.1), a B3 element pattern (EF607770.1), and a D1 element pattern (EF607784.1) [19 (link)]. After hybridization with the probes, the filter was exposed to X-ray film at −80 °C, which was processed with developer and fixer, scanned with epi-white light, and imaged with the Kodak Gel Logic 1500 Imaging System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Telomere Length in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from the WT and FVYL mutant hTERT transfected fibroblasts using a QIAamp DNA-mini Kit (Qiagen). 10 μg of Genomic DNA from each sample was digested overnight at 37° C using 20 U of MboI (NEB) and 20 U of AluI (Invitrogen). Digested DNA was precipitated in 10 mM NaOAc, 1 mM MgCl2, and 75% ethanol overnight at −20° C, then pelleted and resuspended in DNase free water. 3 μg of each sample were run on a 0.5% agarose gel in 1X Tris acetate EDTA (TAE) buffer for 4.5 hours at 120 V. The gel was sequentially washed with 0.25 M HCl, denaturing buffer (0.5 M NaOH, 1.5 M NaCl), and neutralization buffer (0.5 M Tris-HCl, 3 M NaCl, pH 7.5), then blotted onto hybridization transfer membrane (Genescreen Plus, Perkin Elmer Health Sciences). DNA was cross-linked to the membrane using a UV Stratalinker 1800 (Stratagene), and hybridized with 0.2 nM of 32P labeled DNA probe (TTAGGG)4 overnight at 42° C in 25 mL of church buffer (7% SDS, 0.25M Na2PO4 pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 1% w/v BSA). The membrane was washed with 20 mM Na2PO4 pH 7.2, 1% w/v SDS and 1 mM EDTA, exposed to a phosphor imager and the image developed on a typhoon scanner (GE Healthcare). The telomere length was calculated using the software TeloTool (MATLAB) (Gohring et al, 2014 (link))
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Northern Blot Analysis of Mitochondrial tRNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzoLTM (Invitrogen). RNA (4 μg) was electrophoresed through 15% denaturing polyacrylamide gel, electroblotted onto GeneScreen Plus membrane (Perkin Elmer, Cambridge, UK) and fixed by UV crosslinking prior to hybridization with radiolabelled probes. Probe fragments were generated by PCR using the following primer pairs. Human mt-tRNAleu[UUR] forward 5′-TATACCCACACCCACCCAAG-3′, and reverse 5′-GCGATTAGAATGGGTACAAT-3′; human mt-tRNAphe forward 5′-CCAAACCCCAAAGACACCC-3′ and reverse 5′-GAACGGGGATGCTTGCATG-3′; human mt-tRNAval forward 5′-CTGGAAAGTGCACTTGGACG-3′ and reverse 5′-GGGTAAATGGTTTGGCTAAGG-3′; human 5S forward 5′-GTCTACGGCCATACCACCCTG-3′ and reverse 5′-AAAGCCTACAGCACCCGGTAT-3′. Purified amplicons were radiolabelled with [α-32P] dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol, GE Healthcare) using random primers. Unincorporated nucleotides were removed by Sephadex G-50 column (GE Healthcare). Hybridisation was carried out as previously described (Rorbach et al, 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!