The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

43 protocols using optiquant software

1

Radiolabeling of Fe3O4@Al(OH)3 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the time course of radiolabeling, 45 µL of Fe3O4@Al(OH)3 NPs containing 60 µg of Fe were incubated with 5–30 MBq [18F]NaF (5–30 µL) while shaking. Two, five, and 10 min after labeling, 2 µL samples were taken and blotted on instant thin layer chromatography (iTLC) papers impregnated with silica gel (iTLC-SG papers; Varian, Diegem, Belgium). The papers were developed in an elution chamber using NaCl 0.9% as the mobile phase. The read-out was performed using a 2480 Wizard2 Automatic Gamma Counter (20 s protocol; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) after splitting the papers into two equal halves representing the unbound and bound radiotracer. In addition, autoradiography was performed using phosphor screens (Perkin Elmer) in standard film cassettes. The screens were removed from the cassettes after a five-minute exposure and were scanned immediately at 300 dpi resolution using a Cyclone Plus System (Perkin Elmer). Images were analyzed using the manufactures’ Optiquant software (version 5; Perkin Elmer).
For further in vitro and in vivo experiment, NPs are labeled with [18F]NaF for ten minutes in Milli-Q water. Afterward, they are centrifuged for 20 min at 4000 rpm and resuspended in the media of choice for further application.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolic Stability Evaluation of [18F]FPyPEGCBT-c(RGDfK)

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fractions of blood collected during biodistribution studies were used to assess metabolic stability of [18F]FPyPEGCBT-c(RGDfK). Metabolic activity was quenched (v/v) with a solution of 20 % MeCN in PBS (100 mM, pH 7.4). Blood samples were centrifuged at 4 °C (2000 × g, 8 min) and the serum was removed. Serum proteins were precipitated with MeCN (1:1) and centrifuged at 4 °C again (21380 × g, 8 min). Supernatants were removed from pellets, and the activity associated with both was measured. In this fashion, the extraction efficiency of this step was estimated to be 91.0 % ± 4.8 (n = 18). For each sample, an aliquot of supernatant (2 μL) was spotted onto silica gel plates and eluted with 4:6 MeOH-10 % (w/w) aqueous ammonium acetate. Phosphor imaging screens were exposed to dried TLC plates for 10–25 min and analysed by autoradiography using a Cyclone plus and the built-in Optiquant software (Perkin Elmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying DNA End Resection at DSBs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Resection of DSB ends was analyzed at an HO endonuclease-induced DSB at the MAT locus on chromosome III using Southern blots as previously described (7 (link),11 (link)). Galactose induction, sample collection, DNA isolation and purification were carried out as described by Chen et al. (11 (link)). Purified DNA was digested with EcoRI and separated on a 0.8% agarose gel followed by transferring onto a nylon membrane. Radiolabeling of DNA probes was performed following manufacturer's instruction (Takara). Southern blotting and hybridization with radiolabeled DNA probes was performed as described previously (7 (link),11 (link)). The blot was exposed in a Phosphor screen. Signal on the screen was captured by scanning in an OptiQuant Cyclone Plus machine (Perkin Elmer). Intensities of target bands were analyzed with OptiQuant software (Perkin Elmer) and normalized to the TRA1 probe. Resection rate was calculated as previously described (7 (link)). Three independent experiments were performed for each strain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Single-Molecule Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For statistical analysis of single molecule experimental data Origin software was used. Statistical details of experiments can be found in the main text of the publication and in the uploaded file “Single molecule data” in Mendeley data https://doi.org/10.17632/479324n2d5.1. All single molecule experiments for a particular target sequence were performed on at least two different DNA molecules during different days. Error bars of all data shown correspond to standard errors of the mean. Statistical significances (p values) were calculated using a two-sample t-Test. For DNA cleavage experiments the fraction of uncleaved plasmid as function of time was quantified from the gel images using OptiQuant software (Perkin Elmer). The first order DNA cleavage rates of the reactions were determined by fitting a single exponential decay to the data using KyPlot. Error bars provided in Figure 4B correspond to SD of the mean from at least three repeated-measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Biodistribution of Radiolabeled Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild-type mice were anesthetized (2.5% isoflurane in O2 at 1 L/min flow rate) and intravenously injected with [18F]AlF-NOTA-DV1-k-(DV3) and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-DV1-k-(DV3) (3.5–4 MBq). After 75 min, mice were sacrificed by decapitation. Organs of interest were quickly excised and snap frozen in 2-methylbutane (−40 °C). Next, 20 μm sections of liver, kidney and spleen were obtained using a cryotome (Shandon cryotome FSE; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and these were mounted on adhesive microscope slides (Superfrost Plus; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) after which they were exposed to a phosphor storage screen (super-resolution screen; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) overnight. Screens were read in a Cyclone Plus system (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA), and images were analyzed using OptiQuant software (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The remaining excised tissue was further sectioned in 20 μm slices and stored at −20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optimizing Terbium-161 Radiolabeling Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optimization of radiolabeling conditions: [161Tb]TbCl3 (0.2 MBq, 10 μL, 50 mM HCl) was added to 90 μL of a solution with different quantities of the ligand (DTPA, DOTA, DOTA-GA or NETA, 0.1-1.0 nmol) in sodium acetate buffer (0.1M, pH 4.7, chelex treated) and reacted in a glass vial for 60 min at 25 or 40°C (n = 3). The radiochemical yield of each reaction mixture was determined by instant thin-layer liquid chromatography (iTLC-SG, Varian, Diegem, Belgium). iTLC-SG papers were developed in an elution chamber using acetonitrile/water (75/25). The distribution of activity on the iTLC chromatograms was quantified using phosphor storage autoradiography [super-resolution screen, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, USA processed in a Cyclone Plus system (Perkin Elmer) and analyzed using Optiquant software (Perkin Elmer)].
Radiolabeling HSA-constructs: Purified HSA-constructs were labeled using 10 μM of the HSA-conjugate (90 μL) with [161Tb]TbCl3 (0.2 MBq, 10 μL, 50 mM HCl) at 40°C for 60 min (n = 3). Radiochemical yields were determined by iTLC-SG, eluted with sodium citrate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.8). Radiolabeled HSA-constructs were additionally analyzed by radio-SEC using the method described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Northern Blot Analysis of Total RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA (10 μg) was separated on an 8% denaturing polyacrylamide-(7 M)urea gel in Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer (TAE). RNAs were transferred to positively charged Zeta-Probe nylon membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories BV, Veenendaal, The Netherlands) using a semi-dry electroblotting apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories BV). RNAs were covalently cross-linked to the membranes at 1200 mJ using a UVC-508 Ultraviolet Crosslinker (Ultra-Lum Inc.., Carson, CA, USA), after which the blots were hybridized overnight at 42°C in PerfectHyb Plus Hybridization buffer (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie Gmbh, Munich, Germany), using appropriate 32P-labeled DNA oligonucleotides (See Table S13). DNA probes were labeled with 32P-γATP using Polynucleotide kinase (Fermentas/Thermo Scientific), according to the manufacturer. Nylon membranes were washed twice in 2x saline sodium citrate (SSC) buffer with 0.1% SDS, exposed to a Phosphor Screen and imaged using a Cyclone Plus Phosphor Imager and OptiQuant software (PerkinElmer, Groningen, NL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Southern Blot Analysis of HSV-1 Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vero cells were seeded at a density of 1.5×106 cells per dish in 60-mm dishes and inoculated with 2.5 pfu per cell for 24 hours. Total DNA was isolated, digested with the restriction enzymes Mlu I and Afl II, and separated on 1% agarose gels. The DNA was transferred onto Zeta Probe GT nylon membranes (Biorad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), crosslinked by irradiation with 0.2J/cm2 in a UV crosslinker (Spectronics Corporation, Westbury, NY), and hybridized with radiolabeled oligonucleotide probes specific for the HSV-1 KOS UL13 or the US3 genes (S1 Table). Oligonucleotides were end-labeled with [α-32P] dATP using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and reacted with the nylon membranes for 16 hours at 42°C in a solution containing 5ng/ml labeled probe, 7% SDS, 120mM NaH2PO4, and 250mM NaCl. Excess probe was removed by sequential washes with 0.1× SSC containing 0.1% SDS. The hybridization patterns were visualized by exposure to phosphor screens, which were scanned and analyzed with a Cyclone PhosphorImager and OptiQuant software (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying HSV-1 DNA Replication Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vero cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 1.5×105 cells per well. After 6 hours, the cells were inoculated with 2.5 pfu per cell with HSV-1 KOS, or HSV-1 ΔUL13US3, ΔUS3, and ΔUL13 mutants. As a positive control for inhibition of viral DNA sequences, a subset of HSV-1 KOS-infected cultures was treated with 300μM acyclovir (ACV), a known inhibitor of viral DNA synthesis. At 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 hours after inoculation, cells were lysed in 0.5ml of 0.4M NaOH/10mM EDTA, denatured at 95°C, snap-cooled on ice, and directly blotted on Zeta Probe GT nylon membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) in an 8×12 dot-blot pattern using a Convertible vacuum filtration manifold (Whatman-Biometra, Gröningen, Germany). DNA was crosslinked by irradiation with 0.2J/cm2 in a UV crosslinker (Spectronics Corporation, Westbury, NY) and membranes hybridized to a 32P-labeled oligonucleotide probe specific for the HSV-1 US6 gene (S1 Table). The membranes were washed in 0.1× SSC/0.1% SDS, exposed to phosphor screens, which were scanned and analyzed with a Cyclone PhosphorImager and OptiQuant software (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Autoradiography of A2A Receptor Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue slices were thawed and reconstituted in assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% BSA, 1 unit adenosine deaminase/100 mL) for 30 min at RT. Radiosynthesis of [18F]FE@SUPPY was performed as previously described and the product was physiologically formulated (EtOH/0.9% saline 10/90) [20 (link)]. Tissue slices were incubated with 50 kBq [18F]FE@SUPPY (40–200 GBq/μmol) in 100 μL assay buffer for 1 h at RT. Slices were thoroughly washed with ice-cold wash buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4), dried, and exposed to a phosphor screen overnight. The readout of the phosphor storage screen was performed on a Cyclone Phosphor Imager (Perkin Elmer), and data analysis was performed using OptiQuant® Software as previously described [26 (link)]. Statistical testing was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 Software. Differences among groups (colorectal cancer versus healthy colon) were analyzed using a two-tailed, unpaired Student's t-test with Welch's correction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!