The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

User bulletin 2

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany

User Bulletin #2 is a technical document provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific to offer guidance and information about the proper usage and maintenance of their laboratory equipment. The bulletin covers essential details and instructions to ensure the optimal performance and longevity of the equipment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

33 protocols using user bulletin 2

1

Quantitative RT-PCR for Rodent APP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was prepared with Trizol (Life Technologies 15596-026) following manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was generated with the SuperScript III First Strand Synthesis System (Life Technologies 18080-051). cDNA was quantified using LightCycler 480 Probes mastermix (Roche) and TaqMan Gene Expression Assays for rodent APP (Rn01524846_m1) and GAPDH (Hs02758991_g1). Amplification was performed on a Roche LightCycler 480. Data was quantified using the ΔΔCt method (User Bulletin 2, Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying miRNA and mRNA Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess microRNA and gene mRNA expression levels, the TaqMan Fast-PCR kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was utilized according to the manufacturer’s instructions, followed by detection with the 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). All reactions were performed in technical triplicate. Simultaneous quantification of RNU6 and GAPDH was used as reference for miRNA and gene quantification, respectively. The comparative cycle threshold (Ct) method for relative quantification of gene and miRNA expression (User Bulletin #2; Applied Biosystems) was employed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative RT-PCR Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted using a Qiagen RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen AB, Sweden) and treated with DNase (Ambion Turbo DNA-free, Life Technologies Corp., Sweden). Approximately 100 to 500 ng of DNase-treated RNA was used to generate cDNAs, using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies Corp., Sweden) and a mixture of oligoDt18 with nanomers (IDT technologies Inc., Belgium). qRT-PCR was carried out using KAPA 2G SyberGreen (Kapa Biosystems, USA) and the Applied Biosystems 7900HT platform with the following conditions: 95°C for 3 min, 95°C for 3 sec, and 60°C for 30 sec. The primers are indicated in Table 1.
The expression of the genes was normalized to the expression of β-actin (or to U48 where indicated); relative expression was calculated using ΔΔCt method according to the instructions of the User Bulletin #2 (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative RT-PCR for miRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each sample and for each miRNA, 5 ng of total RNA was converted to cDNA by TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems) with the miRNA specific primer contained in the TaqMan MicroRNA assays (Applied Biosystems). MiRNA expression was evaluated in 10 μL total volume by quantitative RT-PCR following the manufacturer protocol in the presence of 1× TaqMan Universal Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) on a 7900HT SDS instrument (Applied Biosystems). Expression differences of miRNAs among samples were determined by the comparative method according to User Bulletin #2 (Applied Biosystems) using the noncoding RNA RNU44 and RNU6B as reference gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The qRT-PCR was performed as previously described [12 (link), 13 (link)]. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Relative fluorescence was calculated using the ΔΔ-CT method, as outlined in User Bulletin 2 (PE Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). The statistical significance of qPCR values at different time points was assessed by Student's paired t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Survival Curves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical significance was analysed using the F test, which was used for testing the homogeneity of variances, followed by the Student’s t test (P > 0.2 by the F test) or the Aspin-Welch test (P ≤ 0.2 by the F test). Student’s t tests and Aspin-Welch tests were conducted at the two-tailed significance levels of 5% (0.05). Cumulative survival curves were constructed using Kaplan-Meier survivorship methods. Differences between the curves were tested for significance by the log-rank test. All data were presented as the means and SD, except for qPCR data generated using the comparative CT (ΔΔCT) method (User Bulletin #2, Applied Biosystems). For the comparative CT method, the ΔCT value was determined by subtracting the average internal control CT value from the average target CT value. The calculation of ΔΔCT involves subtraction by the ΔCT calibrator value. The range given for each mRNA level relative to the control was determined by evaluating the expression: 2−ΔΔCT with ΔΔCT + s and ΔΔCT − s, where s = the standard deviation of the ΔΔCT value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying RASSF1 Variant Expression in PDAC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Messenger RNA expression of the major RASSF1 variants RASSF1A, RASSF1B and RASSF1C was determined in 14 xenografted PDAC and 8 PDAC cell lines. RNA samples were retrotranscribed to cDNA using the First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche). A reverse transcriptase minus cDNA was prepared for each sample as a control. QRT-PCR was carried out as previously described [36 (link)] in 25 μl total volume containing 4 ng of cDNA, 1x Power SYBR Green I Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 400 nM of each primer. After a starting denaturation for 10 min at 95 °C, 45 PCR cycles (15 s 95 °C and 1 min 60 °C) have been performed on ABI PRISM 7900HT SDS instrument (Applied Biosystems). The relative expression level was calculated using transcript level of RPLPO as reference gene and the standard (=1) was the average of the levels of expression of all samples. QRT-PCR data analysis was performed according to the comparative method following the User Bulletin #2 (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative CT Method for mRNA Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Final quantification of mRNA was obtained using the comparative cycle threshold (CT) method (User Bulletin #2, Applied Biosystems). Data are reported as relative transcription or the N-fold difference relative to a calibrator cDNA. In brief, the housekeeping gene for the rat brain tissue, Beta Actin, was used as an internal control against which each target signal was normalized; this is referred to as the ΔCT. Validation studies confirmed that the raw CT values of Beta Actin did not vary by treatment group, confirming Beta Actin as an appropriate housekeeping gene. The ΔCT was then normalized against a calibrator (the average of the control group) (ΔΔCT). The data are expressed as fold change from the control group (2ΔΔCT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative PCR of Igf-1 and Receptor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of Igf-1, Igf-1r, and beta actin (Actb) transcripts was performed using TaqMan assays (Rn00710306_m1, Rn00583837, Rn00667869_m1, respectively) the TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), and the ABI PRISM 7900 HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Warrington, UK). Ct values were analyzed with the standard curve method (User Bulletin #2, Applied Biosystems) and normalized to housekeeping gene Actb.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Aphid Infestation Assay in Soybean

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After BABA or water drenched for 3 days, primary leaves were inoculated with 6 apterous aphids as follows: to confine aphids movement, a 2.5 cm×2.5 cm piece of sticky plastic sheet with a 1.5 cm-diameter hole in the centre was sticked to the upper side of the leaflet of each plants and 6 apterous aphids were placed in each hole with a moist brush slightly, and then covered the hole with organdy fabric [30] (link). After 12, 24, 36 and 48 h, the attacked sites were cut by surgical scissors and aphids were removed quickly using a moist brush. Leaf samples at 0 h were not inoculated with aphids and also brushed when collected. Aphid- or mock-treated leaves for each of six plants were pooled together (three replications for each treatment), respectively, and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. All of the leaves were stored at −80°C before RNA isolation. All gene-specific primers were described in Table 1. Relative expression levels at each time point were calculated from cycle threshold (CT) values according to the ΔCT method (Applied Biosystems User Bulletin#2) using the soybean actin gene as a reference[31] (link)–[43] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!