The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

2100 cryo tem

Manufactured by JEOL

The JEOL 2100 cryo TEM is a transmission electron microscope designed for cryogenic imaging of biological samples. It is capable of high-resolution imaging of frozen-hydrated specimens, allowing for the visualization of delicate biological structures in their native state. The microscope is equipped with advanced features to enable low-dose imaging and maintain the sample at cryogenic temperatures throughout the imaging process.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using 2100 cryo tem

1

Characterization of Stabilized Nanoclusters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Z-average hydrodynamic diameters of the nanoclusters were determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS, Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS). TEM micrographs were obtained by JEOL 2100 cryo TEM at 200 kV, with samples dried on holey carbon-coated copper grids. To demonstrate stability in serum, HPG-SPIONs were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 50% type AB human serum off the clot (PAA Laboratories Inc.) prior to grid preparation. For certain experiments, the cryo-TEM sample was applied to a lacey carbon-coated copper grid and prepared by cryo plunge (FEI vitrobot) into liquid ethane (~90 K) in a controlled environment at 23 °C and 100% humidity. The images were acquired using JEOL 2100 cryo TEM with a cryogenic sample holder (Gatan 626) at 60 kV with digital imaging. Cluster core size was determined from a minimum of 50 clusters using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

TEM Imaging of Amyloid Fibrils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM grids were prepared using a 1 min oxygen plasma cleaning treatment (Harrick Plasma Cleaner PDC-32G, at low power). One 10 µl droplet of Asyn fibril suspension and three 10 µl droplets of ultrapure water for each grid were pipetted onto a clean sheet of Parafilm. Freshly plasma-cleaned TEM grids were inverted onto a sample droplet and rested for 60 s. Excess sample solution was blotted away with filter paper, and grids were placed onto each of the three droplets of water and blotted again in quick succession, to rinse away excess salt. Grids were then rested on a droplet of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) suspension, prepared by diluting a stock solution to 0.12 mg/mL. TMV was used to calibrate electron density in each image93 (link)–95 (link). Imaging was done on a JEOL 2100 Cryo-TEM using an electron accelerating voltage of 80 kV. Micrographs were collected in the tilt-beam geometry using the third objective aperture, an exposure time of 3–5 s. Short, non-overlapping segments of TMV and Asyn fibrils in each image were then selected using the helixboxer function of EMAN296 (link) and exported to the MpUL-multi program for quantification of MPL statistics97 (link). Segments were only chosen from TMV and Asyn fibrils when they were distinguishable in both tilt-beam and accompanying bright-field micrographs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Situ Liquid-Phase TEM of Nanoprism Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid-phase TEM imaging was carried out on a JEOL 2100 Cryo TEM with a spot size 3 with a LaB6 emitter at 200 kV using the Protochips Poseidon 210 liquid flow holder. The illumination area is intentionally kept larger than the fluorescent screen of the TEM (~35 cm). The electron beam is sufficiently spread out to minimize artefacts from the boundary and nonuniformity of the illumination area on the supracrystal growth and to achieve sufficiently low dose rates. The movies were captured by a Gatan Ultrascan charge-coupled device (CCD) camera with a 0.1 s exposure time per frame at a rate of 1.3 frames per seconds (fps). In a typical experiment, an aliquot of the nanoprism solution prepared above (34.5 mM pH = 8 PBS buffer solution) was micropipetted on a SiNx chip (window: 550 μm × 20 μm, 150 nm spacer flow echip, Protochips), which was then assembled with another SiNx chip (window: 550 μm × 20 μm) in a Protochips Poseidon 210 liquid flow TEM holder. The SiNx chips were pretreated at a medium RF level for 45 s using a Harrick PDC-23G basic plasma cleaner to render them clean and hydrophilic. During the liquid-phase TEM imaging, the electron dose rates were kept low (3.7–14.8 e Å–2 s–1). At this dose rate, the thiol ligands on the nanoprism have been shown to stay intact on the particle surface and remain negatively charged in our previous studies31 (link),32 (link),45 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cryo-TEM Imaging of Amyloid Fibrils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM grids were prepared using a 1 min oxygen plasma cleaning treatment (Harrick Plasma Cleaner PDC-32G, at low power). One 10 μl droplet of Asyn fibril suspension and three 10 μl droplets of ultrapure water for each grid were pipetted onto a clean sheet of Parafilm. Freshly plasma-cleaned TEM grids were inverted onto a sample droplet and rested for 60 s. Excess sample solution was blotted away with filter paper, and grids were placed onto each of the three droplets of water and blotted again in quick succession, to rinse away excess salt. Grids were then rested on a droplet of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) suspension, prepared by diluting a stock solution to 0.12 mg/mL. TMV was used to calibrate electron density in each image84 (link)–86 (link). Imaging was done on a JEOL 2100 Cryo-TEM using an electron accelerating voltage of 80 kV. Micrographs were collected in the tilt-beam geometry using the third objective aperture, an exposure time of 3–5 s. Short, non-overlapping segments of TMV and Asyn fibrils in each image were then selected using the helixboxer function of EMAN287 (link) and exported to the MpUL-multi program for quantification of MPL statistics88 (link). Segments were only chosen from TMV and Asyn fibrils when they were distinguishable in both tilt-beam and accompanying bright-field micrographs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Physicochemical Characterization of Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) data was measured between 10° and 80° 2θ at a scan rate of 0.04° 2θ per second using a Rigaku Miniflex 600 diffractometer with Cu Kα X-ray source (λ = 1.54056 Å). The powder sample was evenly spread in the sample holder. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) images were obtained using JEOL 2100 Cryo TEM with a LaB6 emitter at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. TEM samples were prepared by depositing a drop of dispersion of catalysts in ethanol on carbon coated TEM grids. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were collected using a Hitachi S4800 microscope at an acceleration voltage of 10 kV. The specimen was prepared by placing powder samples onto the sample holder using carbon tape. Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) was performed on a Shimadzu EDX-700 spectrometer with Rh X-ray source. The powder samples were added to a polypropylene sample cup with an ultralene film at the bottom for testing. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed using a Kratos Axis ULTRA with an Al Kα X-ray source. The data processing and peak fitting were performed using the CasaXPS software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cryo-EM of Liposome-Hydrogel Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liposome and hydrogel-liposome complex samples for cryo-EM (JEOL 2100 Cryo-TEM at 200 kV) were prepared on a 200-mesh sized lacey carbon-coated copper grid (Structure Probe Incorporation, PA) using a semi-automated Vitrobot (Vitrobot Mark II, FEI). The liposome sample solution was casted on the carbon coated side of the grid at 4 °C and 100% relative humidity. After blotting twice with one-second blotting time, the grid was quenched in liquid ethane to vitrify the liposomes with less than 500-nm ice thickness. For uncrosslinked liposome-hydrogel samples, the procedure was identical except for the blotting condition (blotted thrice with two-second blotting time). The images were obtained at a defocus of ~4000 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanoparticle Suspension Characterization by TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM samples were prepared on carbon film on copper grids (200 mesh, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). One drop (3 μL) of diluted nanoparticle suspension of block copolypeptides (0.1–0.5 mg/mL) was placed on the carbon side and let sit for 1 min. Filter paper was used to blot the remaining suspension. One drop (3 μL) of DI water was placed on the grid and was blotted after 30 s. For negative staining, one drop (3 μL) of ammonium molybdate aqueous solution (1 wt.%) was placed on the grid and was blotted away after 30 s. The samples on grids were imaged using JEOL 2100 cryo TEM at 200 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Plasmonic Prisms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV-Vis spectra of the prisms and separated impurities were measured using a Scinco S-4100 PDA spectrophotometer with a quartz cuvette (path length = 1 cm, VWR). Harrick Plasma PDC-32 (maximum RF power of 18 W, Harrick Plasma) was used for plasma treatment of TEM grids. Asylum Cypher S (Asylum Research) was used for AFM measurement of single-patch prisms. Confocal Raman spectroscopy was performed using a Nanophoton Raman 11 system for ligand-coated prisms in the liquid state at room temperature. A JEOL 2100 Cryo TEM with a LaB6 emitter at 200 kV and Hitachi S-4800 SEM were used for characterizing the size and shape of the prisms, patchy prisms, and the assembled structures. Details regarding TEM image analysis are in Supplementary Notes 5 and 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cryo-TEM Imaging and Tomographic Reconstruction of PA Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free-standing PA membranes were transferred onto a carbon-coated copper TEM grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, CF400-Cu) by scooping membrane fragments using tweezers. Two membranes for each synthesis condition (PA1, PA2 and PA3) were imaged using a JEOL 2100 Cryo TEM at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV with the electron dose maintained at rate of 4–7 e Å−2 s–1 to ensure minimal to no beam-induced damage to the morphology. For electron tomographic reconstruction of the six membranes under study, 61 TEM images were collected every 2° by tilting the sample stage from 0° to –60° and 0° to +60°, with a defocus value of −2048 nm and an objective aperture of 60 μm. The collected TEM images were aligned and contrast transfer function-corrected using IMOD 4.9.378 (link), an open-source software by University of Colorado (http://bio3d.colorado.edu/). The tomograms for the PA membrane samples were generated by a Model-Based Iterative process using another open-source software from Purdue University called OpenMBIR79 (link) (https://engineering.purdue.edu/~bouman/OpenMBIR/). Volume 3D reconstructions, surface visualization and skeletonization of the PA membrane samples were performed using Amira 6.4 (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!