The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

39 protocols using surpass electrokinetic analyzer

1

Electrokinetic Characterization of Fiber Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The measuring device was a Surpass electrokinetic analyzer (Anton Paar, Graz, Austria) equipped with an adjustable “gap” measuring cell. The measuring surface was 20 mm × 10 mm. The fibers were placed on two sample holders using a double-sided adhesive and the gap between the two membrane sample surfaces was 100 µm. Three different solutions were prepared for the analysis: electrolyte solution (KCl 10-3 M at pH 11), acid solution (HCl 10-1M), and basic solution (NaOH 10-1M). The traffic flow of the electrolyte solution (10-3 M of KCl) was 0 to 500 ± 0.5 mL/min, with a pressure maximum differential of 300 mbar. All measurements were carried out with a flow of approximately 100 mL/min and a maximum pressure of 300 mbar. To vary the pH in the beaker containing the electrolyte solution, automatic titration was provided by injection of micro-volumes of acid (HCl) solution. Thus, the range of pH was from the initial pH of KCl around 11 to the acid pH. Before starting any measurement, the symmetry of the flow channel was verified by monitoring the evolution of the pressure as a function of the circulation flow in both directions of flow. The procedure was then validated by checking a flow perfectly proportional to the pressure (linearity of the flow).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Membrane Charge Characterization via Streaming Current

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Membrane charge properties were characterised from streaming current measurements performed with a SurPASS electrokinetic analyzer (Anton Paar GmbH, Austria) equipped with an adjustable-gap cell. All measurements were carried out by setting the distance between the two membrane coupons in the measuring cell to 100 ± 5 μm. Streaming current was measured with a pair of Ag/AgCl electrodes by applying pressure ramps of 300 mbar. Visiolab software was used for data analysis (zeta potential determination). All experiments were performed with 10−3 M KCl background solutions at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C) following the experimental protocol described by Mouhoumed et al.35 (link) Membranes were first equilibrated with the background solution at pH ≈ 9 (pH was adjusted with 0.1 M KOH) and then streaming current measurements were performed by progressively decreasing the pH down to about 3 by additions of 0.1 M HCl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Zeta Potential Characterization of Nanofibrous Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The zeta potential of nanofibrous membranes was determined by measuring the streaming current formed tangentially to the fibrous surface with an electrokinetic analyzer (SurPASS Electrokinetic Analyzer, Anton Paar, Graz Austria). By utilizing the streaming current, the zeta potential (ζ) was calculated by,
where I is the measured streaming current, P the pressure difference across the length of the sample, η and ε the viscosity and dielectric constant of the electrolyte solution, ε 0 the dielectric constant of free space, L the channel length of the measured sample, and A the cross-sectional area along with the sample. Two-1 cm x 2 cm cuts of each sample were fixed inside an adjustable gap cell of the electrokinetic analyzer and the gap between the two opposing faces of the sample was adjusted to approximately 100 μm. An electrolyte solution of 1 mM KCl was used to generate a titration curve of the zeta potential for each sample. The streaming current was logged after 20 seconds of flow-through of a given titration at a pressure of 400 mbar.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Zeta Potential of RFPP Surface

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The zeta potential of the RFPP surface was measured as a function of pH using an Anton Paar SurPASS Electrokinetic Analyzer with an automatic titration unit to adjust the pH between 3 and 10. Two 10×20 mm samples of RFPP were fixed to an adjustable cell sample holder with a gap of approximately 100 μm between the samples. The measurement solution of 1×10−3 M KCl was adjusted to an initial pH of 10 using appropriate volumes of 1 M NaOH. At each pH value, this solution was pumped through the sample holder, in both directions, with a pressure ramp to measure the streaming current. Zeta potential was then calculated using the Helmholtz-Smoluchowski equation. Four measurements were taken at each pH, before adjustment by aliquots of HCl by the automatic titration unit. The reported zeta potential values are averages at each pH value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Zeta Potential and Isoelectric Point of Polyamide Fabric

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The zeta potential and isoelectric point of polyamide fabric were determined using the streaming potential method applied in a SurPASS electrokinetic analyzer (Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria). A pair of fabric samples (ca. 10 × 20 mm2) was equilibrated in a 1 mM KCl supporting electrolyte solution at 20 °C. During the measurement, the electrolyte solution was forced through the packed fabric samples between two perforated Ag/AgCl electrodes in a measuring cell. The pH of solution was adjusted to the range of 3.2–8.5 with 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Zeta Potential Analysis of Membrane Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zeta potential is used to analyze the surface charge of membranes at different pH environments. It is particularly important to analyze the separation efficiency of membranes based on charge and also a confirmation test for surface modification [59 ]. Surface charge was analyzed by measuring the zeta potential using an Anton Paar SurPASS electrokinetic analyzer (Anton Paar, Ashland, VA, USA) in surface analysis mode. Before analysis, membranes were rinsed with copious amounts of DI water to remove any residual solvent or glycerol from the storage solution in the case of PBI membranes. The KCl electrolyte solution (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) used in these measurements had an ionic strength of 1.0 mM. The pH values for the various readings were adjusted using 0.5 M HCl (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 0.5 M NaOH (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solutions for acid and base titrations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Zeta Potential Analysis of Membrane Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zeta potential is used to analyze the surface charge of membranes at different pH environments. It is particularly important to analyze the separation efficiency of membranes based on charge and also a confirmation test for surface modification [59 ]. Surface charge was analyzed by measuring the zeta potential using an Anton Paar SurPASS electrokinetic analyzer (Anton Paar, Ashland, VA, USA) in surface analysis mode. Before analysis, membranes were rinsed with copious amounts of DI water to remove any residual solvent or glycerol from the storage solution in the case of PBI membranes. The KCl electrolyte solution (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) used in these measurements had an ionic strength of 1.0 mM. The pH values for the various readings were adjusted using 0.5 M HCl (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 0.5 M NaOH (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solutions for acid and base titrations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Surface Characterization of Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface chemical properties were analyzed using attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy (Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100 FTIR Spectrometer, Waltham, MA, USA) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, VG K-alpha ThermoFisher Scientific, Inc. Waltham, MA, USA). Surface morphology and cross-sectional images were captured using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, S-4800, Hitachi Co, Tokyo, Japan). Atomic force microscopy (AFM, NanoScope® V, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) mapped the surface morphology to quantify the surface roughness (root mean square, Rq) of the membranes. The water contact angle of the membranes was measured using an automatic interfacial tensiometer (PD-VP Model, Kyowa Interface Science Co. Ltd., Niiza-City, Saitama, Japan). The surface charges of the membranes at pH 3, 7, and 11 were determined using SurPASS Electrokinetic Analyzer (Anton Paar, NSW, Australia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Surface Zeta Potential Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the surface zeta potential (ζ) of each coating,
streaming potential measurements were conducted on a SurPASS Electrokinetic
Analyzer (Anton Paar, Germany) at a constant temperature of 22 °C.
Duplicate samples of each coating were first produced within QCM-D
on PS-coated sensors, after which they were immediately fixed inside
an adjustable gap cell using poly(phenylene sulfide) (PPS) disk-shaped
sample holders (d = 14 mm), separated by a 100 μm
spacer foil. Once inserted in the machine, the cell was rinsed several
times with a 1 mM KCl electrolyte solution (pH 7) and the gap was
adjusted to 140 μm. After ensuring linear flow at a pressure
of 200 mbar, the surface ζ-potential was first measured at pH
7, followed by a pH sweep from 6 to 9. Every measurement included
four ramps. The measuring cell was thoroughly rinsed with Milli-Q
between each experiment until the recorded conductivity was well below
0.1 mV. As a reference, streaming potentials were also recorded on
the pristine gold-plated sensor, PS-coated sensor, and the intermediate
PS-b-PAA primer. The obtained data was further analyzed
using Attract software (version 2.1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of PVDF-modified PSBMA Membrane

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PVDF-modified PSBMA membrane’s chemical composition and the functional group were scrutinized using X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR–FTIR; Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100 FT-IR Spectrometer, Waltham, MA, USA) analysis, respectively. To confirm the surface hydrophilicity of the membrane, we used the water contact angle measurement (WCA; model OCA15EC). The morphology of the PVDF-modified PSBMA membrane was examined by field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM S-4800) and its surface charge was measured by the zeta potential (SurPASS Electrokinetic Analyzer, Anton Paar, Ashland, VA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!