The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

37 protocols using ghrelin

1

Ghrelin Treatment via Miniosmotic Pumps in A53T Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental protocols of ghrelin treatment via Alzet miniosmotic pumps (Alzet, USA) were performed as the previous study.[4b] P‐A53T group: A53T mice with administered nonsense peptide (a scrambled ghrelin peptide; amino acid sequences: GLSFEHQSPQQRAKEKKSP KLPAQPRK); G‐A53T group: A53T mice with administered ghrelin (Sigma, USA) (GSSFLSPEHQKAQQRKESKKPPAKLQPR), which contained acylated ghrelin as physiological level. Ghrelin and nonsense peptide were administered subcutaneously in saline via Alzet miniosmotic pumps (Alzet, USA). There were two time points: 1) mice that were administered peptide starting at the age of 1 month, lasting for 8 weeks, and that were harvested at the age of 3 months (3 m); 2) mice that were administered peptide starting at the age of 1 month, lasting for 8 weeks, and that were harvested at the age of 6 months (6 m).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hormone and Metabolite Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood was collected in pre-cooled vacutainer tubes containing EDTA and kept on ice until centrifugation at 4°C and storage at −80°C. Plasma hormones were measured by radioimmunoassay in duplicate. The precision of assays was as follows: cortisol (MP Biomedical, Solon, OH) intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) 3.78%, inter-assay CV 11.3%; and melatonin (Tecan, Baldwin Park, CA) intra-assay CV 4.68%, inter-assay CV 26.3%. Leptin, ghrelin, adiponectin, and insulin (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA) had CVs as follows: Leptin intra-assay 3.1%, inter-assay 13.5%; total ghrelin intra-assay 4.49%, inter-assay 13.9%; adiponectin intra-assay 8.0%, inter-assay 10.4%; and insulin intra-assay 4.99%, inter-assay 11.3%. All assays had CVs within the acceptable range. Glucose was analyzed via a YSI 2900 glucometer, and NEFA were measured spectrophotometrically using Wako Life Sciences reagents (Richmond, VA). Triglycerides, total cholesterol, dHDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were measured using a Roche Cobas c311 Automated Clinical Chemistry Analyzer (Indianapolis, IN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ghrelin Receptor Antagonist Modulates Dexamethasone Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dexamethasone (Sigma, Shanghai, China), U0126 (Selleckchem, Houston, TX, USA), and SB203580 (Cayman, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and added to complete medium containing a final concentration of 0.1% (v/v) DMSO. Acylated ghrelin (Anaspec, Fremont, CA, USA) was dissolved in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) and cells were pretreated for 1 h before exposure to Dexamethasone. The antagonist of ghrelin receptor, [D-Lys3]-GH-releasing peptide- (GHRP-) 6 (100 μM, Sigma, Shanghai, China), was dissolved in PBS and treated for 1 h before ghrelin disposal. For control, PBS without ghrelin or [D-Lys3]-GHRP-6 was used. For some experiments, cells were pretreated with the ERK inhibitor U0126 (10 μM) or the p38MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (10 μM) for 15 min before Dexamethasone treatment. Control cells were treated with media containing 0.1% (v/v) DMSO without U0126 or SB203580.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplex Hormone Analysis in Rat Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MILLIPLEX Rat Metabolic Hormone Magnetic Bead Panel—Metabolism Multiplex Assay (Millipore Sigma # RMHMAG-84K, EMD Millipore Corporation, Massachusetts, USA) was used to simultaneously analyze Amylin (Active), C-Peptide 2, Ghrelin (Active), GIP (Total), GLP-1 (Active), Glucagon, IL-6, Insulin, Leptin, MCP-1, PP, PYY, TNF-α. Blood samples were collected in tubes containing EDTA (5ul; 0.5M), dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP-4) inhibitor (15 ul; 10mM), and Fisher Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (5ul). Following blood collection, samples were centrifuged at 1000× g for 20 min. Plasma was transferred into a fresh tube on ice and stored at −20 ℃ until the day of further analysis. On the day of analysis, plasma samples were thawed on ice and assayed in triplicates according to the kit manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Appetite-regulating Hormones Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 16 weeks of postnatal age, blood samples were obtained from the mother (3 ml) and the infant (0.5 ml) during fasting (12 hr for mothers and 4 hr for infants). To stabilize appetite‐regulating hormones, blood samples were placed in Vacutainer® EDTA anticoagulant tubes treated with aprotinin protease inhibitor (500 KIU/ml, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (10 μl/ml, EMD Millipore). After collection, plasma was separated by centrifugation at 3000 g for 15 min at 4°C, aliquoted in 0.6‐ml tubes, and then stored at −80°C. The leptin hormones (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), ghrelin, peptide YY, and GLP‐1 (all three from EMD Millipore) were analyzed with commercial enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kits. For the determination of leptin, the samples were diluted 1:20. The sensitivity of the assay for leptin, ghrelin, peptide YY, and GLP‐1 was 7.8 pg/ml, 30 pg/ml, 6.5 pg/ml, and 1.5 pM, respectively. The concentrations of the hormones were determined from curves generated from the standards of each kit, using a logistic regression model of four parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ghrelin Modulation of Feeding Behavior in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice at 12 weeks old were housed in individual cages two days before the beginning of the experiment. Mice were deprived of food for 2 h after the dark period and i.p. injected with ghrelin (0.4 μg/g of body weight; Merck Millipore, Cat# 494127-100G) in physiological saline solution (B. Braun; Cat# 12260029_1019) at 0 min and again at 30 min. We monitored the eating time and food intake for 1 h after the first injection [44 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Feeding Pattern Effects on Metabolic Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood was sampled via venepuncture prior to the control period, and then at 08:00 on each morning of bed rest. Since the CONTINUOUS group were constantly in a fed state, all blood samples during bed rest were taken in a “postprandial” state in this group, vs a fasted state in the INTERMITTENT group. In order to ascertain an effect of feeding pattern independent from feeding status, a final blood sample was collected at 08:00 (in the fasted state for both groups) on the day after bed rest (day 8) prior to the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Samples were collected in EDTA-coated tubes and immediately centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min at 4 °C. Plasma was divided into aliquots, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C until subsequent determination of glucose (GLUC3, reference 05168791 190, Roche; detection limits; 0.11–41.6 mmol L−1), glycated haemoglobin (determined in 4 mL venous blood by high-performance liquid chromatography; Bio-Rad Diamat, Munich, Germany) insulin (Immunologic, reference 12017547 122, Roche; detection limits; 1.39–6945 pmol L−1), GLP-1Total (Epitope Diagnostics Inc. CA, USA; detection limits; 0.6–54 pmol L−1) ghrelin (EMD Millipore, Germany; detection limits; 50–5000 pg mL−1) glucagon (Mercodia AB, Sweden; detection limits; 0.024–100,000 pmol L−1) leptin (Mercodia AB, Sweden). Intra- and inter-assay co-efficients of variation were all < 8%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cord Blood Biomarker Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cord venous blood samples were collected at delivery and centrifuged at 3500 x g for 30 min at 4 °C to separate the serum. The serum samples were stored at − 80 °C. IGF-I (R&D Systems, Inc. Minneapolis, MN, USA), IGFBP-3 (R&D Systems, Inc. Minneapolis, MN, USA), insulin ((R&D Systems, Inc. Minneapolis, MN, USA) and ghrelin (EMD Millipore Corporation, St. Charles, MO, USA) levels were measured using ELISA following the manufacturers’ instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Caloric Restriction Mimetics in Cortical Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To mimic a caloric restriction condition, primary rat cortical neuron cultures were exposed to a Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Sigma- Aldrich) low glucose medium (1 g.L-1 glucose, 100 U.mL-1 penicillin and, 100 μg.mL-1 streptomycin, without B27 supplementation) or, NPY (100 nM; Phoenix Europe GmbH) or acylated ghrelin (10 nM; Bachem) as previous described [18 (link)]. Protein kinase inhibitors were used as follow: PI3K/AKT inhibitor (LY294002; 10 μM) and ERK1/2-MAPK inhibitor (U0126; 10 μM), both from Merck Millipore. Inhibitors were added to cell culture medium 30 min before the addition of caloric restriction mimetics NPY or ghrelin for 6 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Serum Hormones: ELISA and EIA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative sandwich ELISA techniques were used to measure concentration of leptin (Quantikine, RnD Systems, Minneapolis) and NPY (Merck, St Louis) in human serum. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm and the concentration of peptides in serum was obtained in pg/mL (NPY) and ng/mL (Leptin). Competitive Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) techniques were used to measure concentration of ghrelin in human serum (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO) and PYY in human plasma (Aviva Systems Biology, San Diego, CA). The absorbance was measured at 450 nm and the concentration of peptides was obtained in ng/mL for ghrelin and pg/mL for PYY.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!