The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

126 protocols using nitric acid hno3

1

Comprehensive Reagent Profiling for Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemical reagents were of analytical grade without the purification, which were nutrient agar and nutrient broth (HiMedia, India), 99.9% ethanol (C2H5OH) (RCI Labscan, Thailand), 65% nitric acid (HNO3) (Merck, Germany), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) (RCI Labscan, Thailand), 99.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (C2H6OS or DMSO) (SDFCL, India), sodium alginate (Merck, Germany), calcium chloride (CaCl2) (KEMAUS, New Zealand), Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), gallic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), rutin (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), vanillin (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), catechin (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), aluminum chloride hexahydrate (AlCl3) (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), and hydrochloric acid (HCl) (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). For HPLC analysis, the methanol (CH3OH), ethanol, and standard chemicals of eugenol, quercetin, apigenin, kaempferol, ascorbic acid, hydroxychavicol, rutin, syringic acid, catechin, sinapic acid, p-coumaric acid, caffeic acid, ferrulic acid, myrecetin, and gallic acid were HPLC grade (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). 1% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) (RCI Labscan, Thailand) and 1% nitric acid (HNO3) (Merck, Germany) were used for pH adjustments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis and Characterization of Modified Magnetic Beads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were of analytical
grade (AR) without purification before use. For modified bead materials,
ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O)
(LOBA, India), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) (RCI Labscan, Thailand), and
zinc oxide (ZnO) (QRëC, New Zealand) were used. Sodium alginate
(NaC6H7O6) (Merck, Germany) and calcium
chloride (CaCl2) (Kemaus, New Zealand) were used for bead
formation. For the preparation of synthetic dye solution, RB4 dye
(C23H14Cl2N6O8S2) (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was used, and its structure
is illustrated in Table 4. Finally, 0.5% of 65% nitric acid (HNO3) (Merck, Germany)
and 0.5% of NaOH (RCI Labscan, Thailand) were used for pH adjustment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Iodine Content Analysis in Freeze-Dried Carrots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh samples of carrot were frozen and freeze-dried with lyophilizer (Christ Alpha 1–4, Gefriertrocknungsanlangen, Germany). In the freeze-dried samples the concentration of proteins, raw fat, total dietary fiber and ash was measured according to AOAC [17 ] methods. Carbohydrates were calculated as previously reported [15 ].
In order to analyze the iodine content, air-dried carrot root samples were ground in a variable speed rotor mill Pulverisette 14 FRITSCH (Idar-Oberstein, Alemania, Germany) using a 0.5 mm sieve. Digestion of 0.5 g samples of carrot in the mixture of 10 cm3 65% nitric acid (HNO)3 (superpure, Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) and 0.8 cm3 70% perchloric acid (HClO4) (superpure, Polskie Odczynniki Chemiczne, Gliwice, Poland) was conducted in the microwave system CEM MARS-5 Xpress (CEM World Headquarters, Matthews, NC, USA). The content of iodine was analyzed through the cold vapour generation technique with use of high-dispersion Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES; Prodigy spectrometer–Leeman Labs New Hampshire, MA, USA) [18 , 19 ]. A similar method was used for the determination of iodine in the experimental diets for rats.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Trace Element Analysis of Muscle and Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The laboratory material was previously washed with Milli-Q quality distilled water (Milli-Q water purification system, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and laboratory detergent (Acationox, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Only analytical quality reagents were used.
Samples weighing 10 g of muscle mass with the skin from the mid-dorsal musculature area were weighed separately. The whole liver of each specimen of variable weight depending was also weighed. The samples were placed in porcelain capsules (Staatlich, Werheim, Germany) and left at a temperature of 70 ± 10 °C for 24 h in an oven (Nabertherm, Lilienthal, Germany) for complete drying. Subsequently, they were subjected to acid digestion with 65% nitric acid (HNO3) (Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), and, once all the acid had evaporated, they were placed in a muffle furnace (Nabertherm, Lilienthal, Germany) with a temperature–time program of 420 ± 20 °C–24 h, with a progressive rise in temperature of 50 °C per hour [2 ,31 (link)]. The ashes obtained were dissolved in 1.5% HNO3 solution (Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) up to a total volume of 25 mL [2 ,31 (link)]. Finally, they were transferred to sterile and hermetic polyethylene containers for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Surface Modifications of Carbon Yarns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three different surface treatments were employed. The first one consists of the application of a highly flexible two-component epoxy resin (C-E), the mechanical properties of which are reported in Table 2. The yarns were fully impregnated with the epoxy by means of a plastic spatula, then cured at 60 °C for 24 h.
The second treatment involved the application of a nano-silica coating (C-NS). Carbon yarns were immersed in a nano-silica dispersion under stirring for 15 min and then dried at room temperature. The nano-silica dispersion was obtained using the sol-gel method by adding an acidic solution (distilled water: 65% nitric acid in the molar ratio 1:0.032) to a 98% tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) by Evonik, ethanol (analytical grade) solution as described in [38 (link)].
Finally, the third treatment (C-Ox) consisted of carbon yarn sonication in a HNO3/H2SO4 oxidative solution for 15 min, followed by washing with distilled water until a pH of 6 is reached. 65% nitric acid (HNO3) and 95% sulfuric acid (H2SO4) were both purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The oxidative solution was prepared according to [39 (link)], with a 1:3 HNO3/H2SO4 volume ratio. Yarns were dried at room temperature before testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Arsenic Determination in Rice Flour

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nitric acid (HNO3) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Dimethylarsinic acid (DMA), hydrazine sulfate, hydrobromic acid, and other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Rice flour (standard reference material [SRM] 1568a) was obtained from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). All standard solutions, reagents, and samples were prepared using deionized water (18 MΩcm). To avoid arsenic residue contamination, all glassware was soaked in 10% (v/v) HNO3 overnight and washed three times with deionized water before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Functionalization of MWCNTs using PEO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PEO powder (Merck KGaA; Darmstadt, Germany) with viscosity average molecular weight of 30,000 g/mol. and MWCNTs (diameter and length of 20–30 nm and 10–30 nm, respectively) were provided by National Centre for Physics, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan. Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) 95% and nitric acid (HNO3) 70% were purchased from Merck KGaA; Darmstadt, Germany.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Trace Metal Analysis in Fermented Beverages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nitric acid (HNO3, 69%) was purchased from Merck (Bayswater, Victoria, Australia). Fermenting juice and wine were sampled using 10 mL pipettes (Greiner CELLSTAR® serological pipettes) obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) that were pre-washed with 5% HNO3 and storing the pipettes overnight in 5% HNO3 to remove all traces of residual metal ions on the pipettes’ surface. Following the acid wash the pipettes were rinsed five times using water obtained from a Milli-Q purification system (Millipore, North Ryde, NSW, Australia). Samples were stored in 15 mL screw cap digestion tubes containing lids that are certified trace metal free (DKSH, Hallam, Victoria, Australia) at −20 °C until later analysis using ICP-MS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nanomaterial-assisted Vanillin Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was supplied by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) with the average molecular weight (MW) of 4000 g.mol−1 and with a purity of 99%. Sodium sulfate (>99%) was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Sodium sulfate was selected concerning the desired pH (pH = 6.5–7) for vanillin extraction. Vanillin (4-hydroxy-3-methoxy benzaldehyde) with a purity of 99% and dextran (MW = 15000, Purity> 99%) were procured from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Multi-wall carbon nanotube (outer diameter = 10–20 nm, inner diameter = 5–10 nm, maximum length = 30 µm, Purity>95%) was provided by Neutrino company (Tehran, Iran). Sulfuric acid (H2SO4, Purity> 99%) and nitric acid (HNO3, Purity> 99% wt) were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) for the functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (n-ZnO, Purity> 99%) (US Research Nanomaterials, Inc), single-walled Carbon Nanotubes (n-SWCNT, Purity>95%) (US Research Nanomaterials, Inc), titanium dioxide nanoparticles (n-TiO2, Purity> 99%) (Aeroxide P25, Degussa Evonik), Iron oxide nanoparticle (n-Fe2O3, Purity>95%wt) (US Research Nanomaterials, Inc) were used as received. Distilled water was produced by the laboratory equipment (RO-LAB, DW65), applying twice distillation reverse osmosis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Synthesis and Characterization of AgNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Silver nitrate (AgNO3) (99.9%) and ruthenium red (RR) was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (United States). AgNPs were provided by nanoComposix (United States) as aqueous suspensions [citrate coated, mass concentration (Ag) 0.02 mg/mL] of the size 10 nm (9.4 ± 1.7 nm, AgNP-10). Cis-Platinum (II) diamine dichloride (cisPt) was purchased from Enzo Life Sciences GmbH (Lörrach, Germany). Nitric acid (HNO3) was purchased from Merck (Germany). M12 medium and PBS compositions were shown in Supplementary Table S1. For washing purposes 18.2 MΩ⋅cm water (MilliQ, Germany) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!