The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using eclipse version 8

1

Palliative Radiotherapy for Metastatic Bone Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Palliative RT was applied in cases of metastatic bone lesions of spinal cord compression, pain affecting the patients’ QOL, high risk of pathologic fractures, and weight-bearing sites without symptoms.
Gross tumor volume (GTV) was contoured as the enhancing mass and osteolytic or osteoblastic changes of the bone in planning CT or diagnostic images. For hypofractionated RT, clinical target volume (CTV) included GTV plus a 2–3 cm margin longitudinally and 1 cm axially in long bones and 1–2 cm in all directions in the other bones. Planning target volume (PTV) was formed by expanding 7–10 mm from the CTV. For stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), CTV included the gross tumor and the involved spine. PTV was produced by adding 0–2 mm to the CTV [22 (link),23 (link)]. SBRT was applied to the lesions limited to the vertebral bodies with oligometastases, and hypofractionated RT was conducted for all other patients.
Hypofractionated RT and SBRT were planned with Eclipse version 8.6 (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and iPlan version 3.0 (Brainlab, Feldkirchen, Germany), respectively. They were performed using Varian iX (Varian) and Novalis (Brainlab), respectively. Total irradiation dose, fraction size, and the modality of RT were determined by the sites of metastatic bone lesions and adjacent normal structures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SVZ and PVZ Dose Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Treatment planning system was Eclipse version 8.6 (Varian Medical Systems). Dose-volume histograms were generated on the original plans and dose-volume parameters for each SVZ and PVZ volume were extracted. Volume and dose to the i/l, c/l, and b/l SVZ and PVZ were documented as a continuous variable.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Whole Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ninety-four patients had WBRT once the diagnosis of BM was confirmed. For WBRT, each patient was simulated in the supine position in a customized thermoplastic immobilization mask. Three-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (3D-CRT) was delivered using a 2100 C/D linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) for 57 patients. The remaining 37 patients were treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) either with a Hi-Art helical tomotherapy unit, version 2.2.4.1 (TomoTherapy, Inc., Madison, WI, USA), or Eclipse, version 8.6 (Varian Medical Systems Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). For the 37 patients who had a boost dose to their BM, the tumor and boost beams were combined in one integrated treatment plan. Fractionation schemes were as follows: 30 Gy in 10 fractions with or without a simultaneous boost to the brain of 45 Gy, or 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions with or without a simultaneous boost to the brain of 45 Gy. The decision whether to give a RT dose boost to the BM sites was at the discretion of each radiation oncologist. The mean radiation dose was 3781 ± 749 cGy to BM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

VMAT Radiation Therapy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Treatment plans were generated using Eclipse version 8.6 (copyright Varian, Palo Alto). Treatment delivery was done using a 21ix Varian Linear Accelerator. VMAT was delivered in two to three arcs with maximum range of 360-degree with simultaneous variation of the gantry speed, dose rate, and leaf position. An energy of 10 MV and a max dose rate of 600 monitor units per minute were used. Treatment prescriptions are summarized in Table 2. Treatment was delivered using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique (Figure 2). Orthogonal kilovoltage images taken before the treatment confirmed patient position.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

CFSRT for Brain Tumor Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were immobilized in a thermoplastic flat shell (Klarity) with infrared markers for image guidance. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images were acquired with a Light Speed RT instrument (GE Healthcare) at a slice thickness of 1.25 mm. Treatment plans were developed with BrainSCAN version 5.3.1 (BrainLAB), iPlan RT Dose version 4.5.1 (BrainLAB), or Eclipse version 8.6 (Varian Medical Systems). Contrast-enhanced CT images were fused with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images on a radiotherapy planning system.
Thirty-five patients underwent radiotherapy using the Novalis system with 6-MV linear accelerator, m3 micro-multileaf collimator, the ExacTrac X-ray system, and the Robotic Tilt Motion mounted on the Exact Couch top (BrainLAB). Five patients were treated with the Vero4DRT (Hitachi, Ltd.), and one patient was treated with the Clinac iX (Varian Medical Systems).
Gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as the volume of the tumor on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the GTV with a thickened dural tail. The planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the CTV plus a 1–2-mm margin in all directions. CFSRT was performed using multiple dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) or by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The PTV was covered by 90% of the prescribed dose in both the DCAT and IMRT plans.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Radiotherapy Planning Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Datasets were replanned with i) helical tomotherapy, ii) IMRT with HD-MLC of Novalis Tx, and iii) forward planning SCRT using HD-MLC of Novalis Tx. In all Tomo plans, a fan beam thickness (FBT) of 2.5 cm, pitch of 0.3, and a modulation factor of 3 was used during optimization and dose computation. Directional blocking option available on Tomo was used to block hippocampus and complete block for lenses. As part of optimization, the dose was calculated using collapsed cone algorithm. IMRT and SCRT planning were done on eclipse configured with Novalis Tx data. Beam arrangement for IMRT was done using 5-9 fields; whereas, for SCRT it was 6-9 non-coplanar fields. Both plans were calculated using anisotropic analytical algorithm in Eclipse version 8.6 (Varian Medical System). Planning's were done by a single experienced medical physicist.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Supine Breast Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The selected patients were in the supine position on 10°-15° angle breast-tilting board with both the arms elevated and immobilized using Vac-Lock devices. The extent of the breast parenchyma was marked using radio-opaque non-metallic wire for the target volume delineation via palpation. Simulation CT images of 2.5 mm thickness were acquired using a LightSpeed RT16 CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI). Images were sent to Eclipse version 8.9 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) for delineation of the target volume and organs at risk (OARs), and dose calculation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Radiotherapy Protocol for Brain Metastases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patients were immobilized in a head–neck–shoulder thermoplastic mask with their arms resting at their sides, while a tattoo line along the longitudinal axis of the body was drawn to facilitate setup. The GTV (Gross Tumor Volume) of the primary tumor and metastatic lesions was determined, and the CTV (Clinical Target Volume) included the whole brain, spinal cord, and terminal cisternae. The PGTV (Planning Gross Target Volume)/ PCTV (Planning Clinical Target Volume) was formed by adding a margin of 3 ~ 5 mm to the GTV/CTV. The following median were recorded: volume of PCTV 2146.2 cm3 (1965.67–2628.54 cm3), length of PCTV 76 cm (57.5–87 cm), fraction 20 (20–24), prescribed dose of PGTV 45 Gy (40–54 Gy). The detailed information was tabulated (Table 1). All planning target volumes were optimized in synchrony using a commercial TPS (Eclipse version 8.9; Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Colinear isocenters (iso1, iso2, and iso3) were placed in sequence. The iso1 was for cranial PCTV, iso2 was for the upper spinal cord PCTV, and iso3 was for the lower spinal cord PCTV. The field set iso1 consisted of five or seven fields with an average gantry angle, and the field sets iso2 and iso3 consisted of fields with three angles: 240°, 120°, and 180°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Optimization of Left Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Left breast cancer patients who visited our institution from November 2014 to April 2015 were included in this study. Among them, 20 patients were randomly selected and further investigated. Before simulation computed tomography (CT), whole breast tissue of each patient was wired using radio-opaque material. Simulation CT was performed using a LightSpeed RT16 CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) with 2.5 mm thickness. When simulation CT was conducted, all patients used a vac-lock immobilization device with a 10 degree tilted breast board. Eclipse version 8.9 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) was used as a radiation treatment planning system.
The planning target volume (PTV) of the left breast, heart, left ventricle, both lung, and spinal cord were delineated. To evaluate the dose delivered to the skin, 2 mm thickness skin (2-mm skin) and 3 mm thickness skin (3-mm skin) were also contoured. The average volume of PTV was 453.6 cm3 (range: 180.1 to 761.4 cm3). For the consistency of target volume and OARs, all of these were contoured by a single experienced radiation oncologist. The PTV was based on the RTOG atlas [12 ]. However, the PTV was edited according to the wired area, surgical clip, and seroma, and we trimmed the anterior border by 3 mm from the skin for skin-sparing treatment planning.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Planning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the simulations, patients underwent a CT scan with LightSpeed RT16 CT scanner (General Electric Company, Waukesha, WI). They were immobilized on a breast-tilting board with both arms in the up position with a vac-lock immobilization device. The boundaries of the remaining breast tissue were wired by nonmetallic thread through palpation and visual inspection. The CT images were acquired in 2.5-mm thickness. Eclipse version 8.9 (Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA) was used to process CT images, contour the regions of interest, and perform 2 kinds of dose calculations.
The clinical target volume (CTV) of the left breast (remaining breast parenchyma), levels I, II, and III of the axilla, heart, lung, and spinal cord were delineated. For the consistency and reliability of target volume and organs at risk (OARs), all of these were contoured by 1 experienced radiation oncologist and were based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) atlas.[7 ] The breast CTV was edited according to the wired area and some specific CT finding such as a surgical clip and seroma, and we trimmed the anterior border by 3 mm from the skin for skin-sparing treatment planning.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!