The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using mopc21

1

In vivo Activation and Chemokine Neutralization of CD8+ TM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vivo activation of CD8+TM (Fig.5D) was performed as described
(44 (link)), i.e. vaccine-immune mice were
injected with 100μg OVA257 peptide i.v. followed by
250μg BFA/PBS i.p. 30min later; spleens were harvested 2h after peptide
injection, processed and analyzed by FC. For in vivo chemokine neutralization in
the context of CD8+TM recall responses, we employed
experimental designs, antibody dosages and treatment schedules as detailed in
the legend to Fig.S3E/Fusing the following antibodies for CCL5 blockade: αCCL5 clone R6G9
(mIgG1 (45 (link))) or mIgG1
isotype clone MOPC-21 (Sigma); combined CCL3/4/5 blockade: αCCL3 clone
756605 (rIgG1), αCCL4 clone 46907 (rIgG2a), αCCL5 clone 53405
(rIgG2a) (RnDSystems) or rIgG control; and XCL1 blockade: polyclonal
αXCL1 AF486 or goat IgG control AB-108-C (RnDSystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PBMCs Stimulation and Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs from healthy volunteers were stimulated with 2 μg/mL Con A (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany) for 48 h in a 37 °C incubator. After Con A stimulation, PBMCs were washed twice with PBS. Con A-activated PBMCs and PBMCs from RA patients were stimulated with anti-ENO1 mAb (1 μg/106 cells) at room temperature with rotation for 1 h. MOPC-21 (1 μg/106 cells; Sigma-Aldrich) was used as an isotype control antibody. After ENO1 stimulation, cells were transferred to a 24-well plate and incubated in a 37 °C incubator.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ICAM-1-Fc Stimulation of PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs (1 ×105) were incubated for 18–24 hrs with plate-bound ICAM-1-Fc (coated at 5 μg/ml) or with an isotype-matched negative control mAb (5 μg/ml MOPC-21, Sigma Aldrich). PBMCs were resuspended and Fc receptors were blocked by incubation in a solution of PBS containing 25% human AB serum (Atlanta Biologicals) for 20 minutes at 4°C, then cell-surface staining was performed for 30 minutes at 4 °C using the following human-specific antibodies or tetramers: anti-CD3 (OKT3, Biolegend), anti-CD4 (OKT4, Biolegend), anti-CD8α (HIT8a, Biolegend), anti-CD8β (SIDI8BEE, eBioscience), anti-CD11a (HI111, Biolegend), anti-CD56 (5.1H11, Biolegend), CD1d tetramer (PBS-57 loaded, NIH Tetramer Core Facility), MR1 tetramer (5-OP-RU loaded, NIH Tetramer Core Facility), anti-Vδ2 TCR (123R3, Miltenyi Biotec). Cells were fixed and permeabilized according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences), then stained with anti-IFN-γ (4S.B3, Biolegend), anti-PLZF (Mags.21F7, eBioscience), or the respective negative control mAbs suggested by the vendor. Cells were then washed, resuspended in PBS and analysed on an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Staining data were analyzed using FlowJo analysis software (Tree Star Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Modulation of ENO1-stimulated PBMC Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GV1001 was provided by KAEL-GemVax (Seongnam, Korea). GV1001 was dissolved in PBS for a 10 mM final concentration. After Con A-activated PBMCs and RA PBMCs (4×106/ml) were pre-treated with GV1001 (100 µM) for 1 h at room temperature with gentle rotation, cells were stimulated with anti-ENO1 mAb (1 mg/ml) for 1 h at room temperature with gentle rotation. MOPC21 (1 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) was used as an isotype control. After ENO1 stimulation, cells were seeded onto 24-well plates and incubated at 37℃ in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Monoclonal Antibody Treatment of U373 MG Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U373 MG cells stably expressing hepaCAM were treated overnight with a monoclonal antibody against the extracellular hepaCAM domain (clone 419305; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at a concentration of 10 μg/ml. Mouse IgG1 (MOPC-21; Sigma-Aldrich) was used as an isotype control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ChIP Assay for HMGA2 Transcription Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ChIP assay was performed as described previously.18, 19 Chromatin solution (2 ml) was incubated overnight with 2 μg of anti‐myc antibodies (PL14) and control mouse antibody (MOPC21; SIGMA‐Aldrich, St Louis, MO). DNA was purified and subjected to qPCR analysis as described above. We used the following PCR primers: amplicon 1 (between −2023 and −1821 from the transcription start site of the HMGA2 gene predicted from RefSeq NM_003483.6), 5′‐AGCAGCCTGAAAACAAGTGG‐3′ (sense) and 5′‐GGGGAGTCACTGAGGAGTTC‐3′ (antisense); amplicon 2 (between −660 and −484), 5′‐GCATGTCTCCGTGTATGTGC‐3′ (sense) and 5′‐GAGCCAACACTTTGCAGGAA‐3′ (antisense). Per cent input values were calculated by comparing Ct values of input and immunoprecipitated fractions and were shown as ratios relative to those of control samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Platelet-Specific Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The rabbit anti-Tspan9 polyclonal antibody was as previously described [15], anti-α-tubulin monoclonal DM1A was from Sigma, anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal 4G10 was from Millipore, anti-LAT phospho-specific antibodies were from Abcam, anti-human GPVI monoclonal HY101 for biochemical experiments was kindly provided by Dr Peter Smethurst (NHS Blood and Transplant, Cambridge, UK), anti-human GPVI monoclonal 1G5 for microscopy was kindly provided by Dr Elizabeth Gardiner (The John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra, Australia) [29] and mouse IgG1 isotype control monoclonal MOPC-21 was from Sigma. Fluorescently labelled monoclonal antibodies used for flow cytometry and single particle tracking were from Emfret, apart from anti-mouse integrin α6 (AbD Serotec), anti-mouse CLEC-2 17D9 [30] and anti-ADAM10 and anti-CD9 (R&D Systems). Atto 647N and 565 fluorescent dyes were from Sigma, and 3,3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (DiOC6) membrane dye was from Molecular Probes. Platelet agonists were cross-linked collagen-related peptide (CRP) from Prof Richard Farndale (Cambridge University, UK), Horm collagen from Takeda, ADP from Sigma, protease-activated receptor (PAR)-4 peptide (AYPGKF) from Alta Bioscience and arachidonic acid from Cambridge Bioscience.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of MUC1 Microparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Size determination of MVsMUC1 was performed by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) technology (30 (link)). MVs were thawed on ice and diluted in PBS between 1:500 and 1:20,000 to achieve the optimal number of MVs/mL. Three videos (30 s each) were recorded for each sample loading, employing the NanoSight NS300 instrument (Malvern Instruments Ltd, Malvern, UK). Measurements were performed employing the NTA 2.3 analytical software. Results were shown as the average of the three recordings.
MUC1 expression on MVsMUC1 was evaluated by flow cytometry. MVsMUC1 (5 μg/sample) were incubated with the anti-MUC1 MoAb Ma552 (Monosan) (1:100 for 30 min, 50 μL/sample, RT). After washing in PBS w/o Mg++ and Ca++(1 mL/sample, 30 min at 13,000 rpm, RT), MVsMUC1 were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (1:600; Jackson-Immunoresearch Laboratories, 50 μL/sample). MoAb MOPC21 (1:100; Sigma-Aldrich) was employed as isotype control. To exclude background noise, flow cytometry analysis was performed setting the lowest Forward Scatter Threshold [300] and the highest FSC/SSC voltage. A total of 30,000 events were acquired with low flow rate, using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer running FACSDiva data acquisition and analysis software (Becton Dickinson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phenotypic Characterization of Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DC phenotype staining was performed using the following antibodies directly conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or phycoerythrin (PE): IgG1-FITC and IgG1-PE as isotype controls (both from Biolegend); anti-HLAII-DR-FITC, anti-CD86-FITC, anti-CD83-PE (all from BD Biosciences), anti-CD40-PE, anti-CD14-PE, and anti-CCR7-FITC (all from Biolegend). DCs (2 × 105 cells/50μL sample) were incubated with conjugated MoAb (according to the manufacturer's recommendation) for 30 min at room temperature (RT). After washing (in 2 mL of PBS w/o Mg++ and Ca++, centrifuged at 250 × g for 5 min), cell pellet was resuspended in PBS (100 μL); at least 1 × 104 events were evaluated using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer running FACSDiva data acquisition and analysis software (Becton Dickinson).
To evaluate MUC1 expressed by MUC1-DG75 cells, 1 × 105 cells were incubated with MoAb Ma552 (1:40; Monosan, Netherlands, 50 μL/sample) for 30 min at RT and binding revealed with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (1:600; Jackson-Immunoresearch Laboratories, PA, USA). MoAb MOPC21 (1:100; Sigma-Aldrich, 50 μL/sample) was employed as isotype control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Modulating TGF-β Signaling in Hyperoxia-Induced BPD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The inhibition of TGF-β signalling in mouse pups in the hyperoxia-based animal model of BPD has shown by our own [6 (link), 15 (link)] and other [16 (link), 17 (link)] groups to normalise TGF-β signalling, and to partially restore normal alveolar development. Neutralization of TGF-β signalling in mouse pup lungs (n = 6, per group) was undertaken exactly as described previously using pan-TGF-β neutralising IgG (1D11; R&D Systems), and an isotype-matched non-immune IgG (MOPC21; Sigma) [6 (link), 15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!