The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cd3cn

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany, United States

CD3CN is a chemical compound used as a solvent in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. It is a deuterated form of acetonitrile, with the hydrogen atoms replaced by deuterium atoms. CD3CN is commonly used as a solvent for analyzing samples in NMR experiments due to its chemical stability and compatibility with a wide range of organic compounds.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using cd3cn

1

NMR Characterization of Compound Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The NMR experiments were carried out in a Bruker Avance III spectrometer using a 14.1 Tesla, (600.12 MHz in hydrogen frequency) magnetic field and 3 mm inverse triple cryoprobe 1H, 13C, and 15N nuclei. Each fraction was solubilized using 180 µL of CD3CN (Sigma-Aldrich Co., Darmstadt, Germany). Chemical shifts to all experiments were calibrated from the solvent signal (CD3CN) at 1.94 ppm. 1H experiments were performed using the zg30 pulse sequence. Instrumental parameters were set up as follow: 1.0 s relaxation delay, spectral width from 0 to 12 ppm, 32 k points, and 2.72 s of acquisition time. The post-processing was performed using a 0.1 Hz (Line Broadening—LB) exponential multiplication factor, and phase and baseline were manually corrected. 1H-13C HMBC experiments (hmbcetgpl3nd) were carried out using a spectral width of 0 to 10 ppm for the F2 dimension (1H) and 0 to 200 ppm for the F1 dimension (13C). An acquisition time of 0.0852 s, relaxation delay 2 s, and 32 scans for 128 increments was employed. Mono dimensional 1H TOCSY (seldigpzs) experiments were performed at 7.18, 6.909, and 6.86 ppm. Regarding these experiments, the following conditions were used: spectral width of 0 to 10 ppm, 2.72 s acquisition time, 1.0 s relaxation delay, 32 k points, and 128 scans.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ruthenium Complex Synthesis and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All materials were used as received without further purification, including 1,10-phenanthroline, 2,2′-biquinoline, CD3CN, CD3OD, (CD3)2CO, lithium chloride, pyridine, silver tetrafluoroborate, tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate, and triphenylphosphine which were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Ethanol (200 proof) was obtained from Decon Laboratories, acetone, acetonitrile, dichloromethane, diethyl ether, N,N-dimethylformamide, 85% H3PO4, and toluene were acquired from Fischer Scientific, and ammonium hexafluorophosphate was purchased from Oakwood Chemical. Complexes 1b and 2b,41 (link) [Ru(phen)2Cl2],42 (link) [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2,43 (link) and triphenylphosphine oxide44 (link) were prepared according to literature procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

NMR Spectroscopy and GC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All 1H NMR spectra were reported in units of parts per million (ppm) and measured relative to the signals for residual chloroform (7.26 ppm) in CDCl3/and for residual CH3CN in CD3CN at 1.96 ppm, unless otherwise stated. All 13C NMR spectra were reported in ppm relative to CDCl3 (77.23 ppm), unless otherwise stated and were obtained with 1H decoupling. Acetonitrile, CD3CN, FeIICl2, FeIIBr2, and trimethylsilyltriflate (TMSOTf) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Diethyl ether was procured from Spectrochem chemicals. Ethylbenzene was bought from TCI. H218O was purchased from Sigma Aldrich and ICON-isotope. 2-(Chloromethyl)quinoline hydrochloride was purchased from TCI and di(2-pyridyl)ketone was purchased from Alfa Aesar. All the products were analyzed by GC-MS analysis. GC-MS was performed on a Thermo Scientific ISQ QD Mass Spectrometer attached with a Thermo Scientific TRACE 1300 gas chromatograph using an HP-5ms capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, J&W Scientific) with helium as the carrier gas. The product yields were calculated from GC traces by comparing with the area percentage of standard products.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

NMR Spectroscopy Analysis of Compounds 1 and 2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NMR spectra of compounds 1 and 2 were obtained from solutions (500 µL) in acetonitrile-d3 (CD3CN, 99.96 atom % D; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) using 5 mm o.d. Wilmad tubes (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The spectra were acquired on an Avance AVII 600 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) equipped with a 5 mm CP-TCI triple resonance inverse cryoprobe with a Z-gradient coil. NMR assignments were obtained from the examination of 1H, DEPT135, 1-D SELTOCSY, COSY, TOCSY, g-HSQC, g-HMBC, HSQC-TOCSY, and NOESY NMR spectra. The data were processed using Bruker TOPSPIN (version 2.1 pl4 or version 3) software. Chemical shifts, determined at 25 °C, were reported relative to internal CHD2CN (1.96 ppm) and CD3CN (118.26 ppm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Purification of Common Solvents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CDCl3, CD3CN, and DMSO-d6 were purchased
from Aldrich. All other reagents were obtained from commercial sources
and were used without further purification unless indicated otherwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Physicochemical Characterization of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Physical measurements 1 H and 13 C NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Advance 400 MHz spectrometer at room temperature {CDCl 3 (99.8%, CIL), CD 3 CN (>99.8%, Aldrich), or CD 3 OD (>99.8%, Aldrich)}. Luminescence was measured on a Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer with λ ex = 488 nm: emission spectra were collected from λ em = 500-800 nm. Absorbance (200-600 nm) was measured on a VARIAN CARY 50 Probe UV-visible spectrophotometer. Mass-spectroscopic analysis was performed by the RSC Mass-Spectrometry Facility (Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra), and the Campbell Microanalytical Laboratory (Chemistry Department, University of Otago) performed the microanalyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!