The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using office excel 2016

1

Statistical Analysis of ADL Nonlinearity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Office Excel 2016 and SPSS 19.0 software. The ADL was calculated from a multiple regression analysis. The nonlinearity of polynomials was considered clinically acceptable when the ADL was less than a corresponding threshold. The degree of consistency between two products was evaluated by the Interrater Reliability (Kappa) test and the consistency was statistically significant when P < .05. The degree of correlation was evaluated by Pearson's R Correlation test and the correlation between two sets of data was considered statistically significant when P < .05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis and PCA in Excel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data obtained were used for statistical analysis and PCA using all‐cause models in Microsoft Office Excel 2016 and SPSS 26.0. The significance level was set at p < .05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Real-Time qPCR Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Office Excel 2016, and significance analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0. Student’s t-test was used for significance analysis between two treatments, and Duncan’s test was used for the analysis of more than three treatments. The error is shown as the standard deviation between the biological replicates. For the collection and mapping of real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR data, GraphPad Prism 7.00 software was utilized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Stillbirth Risk Factors Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were entered into Microsoft Office Excel 2016 and exported into the statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 26 for analysis. Continuous variables, including age, gestational age, parity, gravidity, interpregnancy period, number of antenatal care visits, gestational age at booking visit, number of ultrasounds, number of IPTs, gestational age of rupture of membranes, and birth weight, were categorized and used as such for analysis. Missing data were not included in the final analysis. The stillbirth rate was calculated as the number of stillbirths per 1000 live births. The distribution of exposure variables amongst the cases and controls was described using frequency tables. Associations between exposure variables and stillbirth were assessed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test in cases where at least one expected frequency was less than 5. Variables with p values less than 0.1 were subsequently included in a multivariable logistic regression to determine adjusted odds ratios while controlling for confounding factors. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

CSHI Evaluation of Vocal Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were entered into Microsoft Office Excel 2016 spreadsheets and analyzed using the SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Nonparametric tests were used because the normality of the data was not confirmed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (P > 0.060). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median, minimum and maximum and 95% confidence interval. The comparison between the CSHI domains were made using the Friedmann test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the indices obtained in the CSHI with the categorical variable vocal classification. The post-hoc analysis of multiple comparisons was performed when a significant value was identified. In addition, the Spearman Correlation test was used to correlate the scores obtained in the CSHI with the other continuous variables (age, time of singing, and weekly singing hours). All results with error probability P < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Seroprevalence and Risk Factors of Bovine Neosporosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were analyzed using Microsoft Office Excel 2016 and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (SPSS. v.20, Chicago, IL, USA). Farm seroprevalence was determined by the ratio of positive farms to the total number of farms visited. A positive farm contained at least one seropositive cow. Cow seroprevalence was measured by the number of seropositive cows to the total number of cows examined. Confidence interval (CI) was constructed at the 95% level of confidence.
CI was calculated using the following formula:
CI=P±Pa.
P is seroprevalence obtained. Pa is absolute precision. Pa has been calculated using the following formula:
The relationship between seroprevalence and neosporosis risk factors was determined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models [17 ]. The first phase was a univariable analysis of variables by a Chi-square test and crude odds ratios (OR). In the multivariable analysis, significant variables at p≤0.2 were chosen. The overall fit of the logistic regression models was tested with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. When the OR was greater than 1 and p≤0.05, variables were considered risk factors. Multifactorial correspondence analysis (MCA) was also performed and is a graphical presentation applicable to categorical data tables in addition to logistic regression [18 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparing Plum Yield Impact Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data processing was conducted using Microsoft Office Excel 2016, and all statistical analyses was conducted using the SPSS 21.0 software package. One-way analysis of variance and the least significant difference test (LSD) were used to check the differences of plum yield and environmental impacts per unit among the different groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Office Excel 2016 and SPSS Statistics V25. Comparisons between groups were performed using unpaired two-tailed t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher exact test. A P value <.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Data Analysis Methodology for Researchers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used Microsoft Office Excel 2016 and SPSS 24.0 for data analysis. Descriptive data were presented as the number, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, wherever appropriate. We compare the study groups via student t-test and Mann-Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed continuous variables, respectively; and chi-square test for categorical variables. An overall 5% of Type-I error level was used to infer statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Descriptive Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microsoft Office Excel (2016) was used for data recording, and SPSS for Windows (version 26) was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were performed. Categorical variables are summarized by percentages, and continuous data are summarized by the median and interquartile range (IQR) after checking for normality.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!