The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using relative expression software tool 2009

1

Relative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Relative gene expression levels of the genes of interest were calculated by the Relative Expression Software Tool (REST) 2009 Software (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Statistical analysis of other data was performed with STATISTICA 10 software (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, USA). Differences between means were evaluated by one-way ANOVA, with data of normal distribution, and homogeneity of variances was confirmed. To compare treated groups to controls we used Dunnett post-hoc test. For the comparison of different treatments we used Fisher LSD test. Level of significance was set at P < 0.05. All values were expressed as means ± standard deviations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Relative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Relative gene expression levels of the genes of interest were calculated by the Relative Expression Software Tool (REST) 2009 Software (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Statistical analysis of other data was performed with STATISTICA 12 software (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, USA). Differences between means were evaluated by two-way ANOVA, with data of normal distribution, and homogeneity of variances was confirmed. To compare treated groups to controls Dunnett post-hoc test was used. For the comparison of different treatments we used Fisher LSD test. Level of significance was set at P<0.05. All values were expressed as means ± standard deviations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative PCR Analysis of cPLA2α Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using the UltraClean Tissue & Cells RNA Isolation Kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, CA). The first strand cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA with random hexamers and SuperscriptIII (Cat. #: 48190 and P/N 56575, Invitrogen). The primers used for cPLA2α were forward 5'-ATCCTGATGAATTTGAGCGA and reverse 5'CAAGTAGAAGTTCCTTGAACG. The TATA box binding protein (TBP) was used as the housekeeper gene, forward 5'-GAACCACGGCACTGATTTTC, reverse 5'-CCCCACCATGTTCTGAATCT. Quantitative PCR measurements were performed using a SensiMix SYBR Mastermix Kit (Cat. #: QT605, Bioline, Sydney, NSW, Australia) and a RotorGene 6000 PCR machine (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, CA). Conditions for PCR were one cycle of 10 min at 95 °C; 40 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C and 30 s at 60 °C. The Relative Expression Software Tool 2009 (Qiagen) was used to calculate relative changes in cPLA2α normalized to the housekeeping gene. Amplification efficiency was determined using a 5-point dilution curve and was within 100% ± 3% for cPLA2α and TBP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Diagnostic Potential of miR-21 in CRC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tables 1 and 2 show the patients and healthy control subjects adjusted for potential confounding factors such as demographic variables and tumor characteristics. Based on relative expression of miR-21 as a target gene versus miR-16 as a reference gene, the up-regulated expression of miR-21 was measured using the ΔΔCT method[29 (link)] and Relative Expression Software Tool 2009 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The Analyses of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney statistic tests were used to evaluate the differences of miRNA expression levels in serum or stool samples. As a diagnostic test, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was applied to determine the sensitivity and the specificity of miR-21 expression in serum and stool of CRC patients. In addition, internal validation was performed using the BCa bootstrap method to accurately estimate the ROC curves and optimal cut-off values. The method was used to discriminate CRC patients from healthy control subjects, as well as patients with TNM stages III-IV from stages I-II. Data analysis was performed by using MedCalc®version 13.1.2.0 (Acacialaan 22, 8400 Ostend, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a specific post hoc test. Statistical analysis was performed using Relative Expression Software Tool 2009 (Relative Expression Software Tool, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), which is based on the Pair Wise Fixed Reallocation Randomization Test© (Pfaffl et al., 2002). Differences were considered statistically significant for *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative miRNA Expression Analysis in CRC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The efficiency of real-time PCR for both miR-135b and miR-16 was about 2; so, the rate of upregulation was measured using ΔΔCT methods, by REST (Relative Expression Software Tool) 2009 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) based on the relative expression of a miR-135b versus miR-16 as a reference gene [30] . The computing of -ΔΔCT was accomplished via transform menu of IBM SPSS statistics® version 20 (Chicago, IL, USA). For the analyses of variance, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney statistics test were used to evaluate differences in serum or stool miRNA expression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of miR-135b expression in serum and stool of CRC patients as a diagnostic test. Data analysis was done with MedCalc®version 13.1.2.0-64bit (Acacialaan 22, 8400 Ostend, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

TNF-RII Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The levels of the TNF-RII gene transcript were analyzed using the Relative Expression Software Tool 2009 (REST 2009) (Qiagen, USA), and the significance of differences between the groups was verified by the Pair-Wise Fixed Reallocation Randomization Test (Pfaffl et al. 2002) . In addition, a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA for ranks, a median test for the analysis of the percentage of TNF-RII+ cells (for non-normal data distribution) and multiple comparisons in a nonparametric test at p<0.05 and p<0.01 were used to verify the significance of differences between animal groups. Data were processed using the STATISTICA 9.0 software package (StatSoft Inc., USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of VISA Mechanism Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression of the most common loci and genes known to be involved in the VISA mechanism, including graTSR, vraTSR, walKR, agr RNAIII, sceD, pbpB, and, fmtA were quantified in wild-type VAN-S and mutant CHGVan-I strains using the Reverse Transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) method. The gyrA gene was used as an internal control gene.
For this purpose, RNA was extracted (GeneAll Hybrid-R™ RNA isolation kit, Korea) from mid-logarithmic phase cultures, then treated with DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and reversed to cDNA (Yekta Tajhiz Azma cDNA synthesis kit, Iran). The RT-qPCR was carried out in a Rotor-Gene Q (Qiagen, Germany) with the cDNA template in the final concentration of 5 ng, SYBR Green (Ampliqon, Denmark), and previously designed primers (Pishgam Biotech, Iran) [3 (link), 11 (link)–14 (link)].
The RT-qPCR experiment was independently performed three times. Relative expression data were analyzed using the Relative Expression Software Tool (REST) 2009 (v2.0.13; Qiagen, USA) by the ∆∆Ct method. The pairwise fixed randomization test with 2000 iterations (as randomization number) in a rest standard mode was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Validating Microarray Results with RT-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate the microarray results, the expression levels of 10 selected genes in the cultured cells treated with GO (compared with cultured cells treated with buffer) were quantified by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). cDNA was synthesized from 400 ng of total RNA using the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Amplification primers were designed using the Clone Manager Suite (Sci-Ed Software, Morrisville, USA). RT-qPCR assays were carried out using the LightCycler®480 and LightCycler®480 FastStart SYBR Green I Master (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany). All assays were run in triplicate. Quantification cycles (Cq) were calculated using the second derivative method (LightCycler®480 Software, Roche). The fold change in gene expression levels, corrected by efficiency, was analyzed using Relative Expression Software Tool (REST 2009) (Qiagen; [57 (link)]). The expression data were normalized to the polymerase (RNA) II (DNA directed) polypeptide A (POLR2A) and ribosomal protein L29 (RPL29) genes, which in a RefFinder algorithm-based selection were the most stable among the 4 candidate reference genes tested. All experiments were performed according to the MIQE guidelines [58 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Differential Expression Analysis of mRNA and miRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data represent mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3 or more independent experiments. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests, One way ANOVA, or Two way repeated measures ANOVA were performed using Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA) with significance set to p < .05. Linear regression was performed using GraphPad QuickCalcs. Relative mRNA or miRNA expression was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method using Relative Expression Software Tool (REST-2009, Qiagen) (Pfaffl et al., 2002 (link)). Whisker box plots generated with REST-2009, show relative mRNA or miRNA expression as median (dashed midline inside the box), interquartile ranges 1 and 3 (upper and lower edges of the box), and maximum and minimum expression values (top and bottom whiskers) (Pfaffl et al., 2002 (link)). We are aware of growing concerns about the indiscriminate use of p values as the sole measure of statistical significance (Wasserstein et al., 2019 ). Thus, we discuss why the differences found appear to be meaningful.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!