The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas system software

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

The SAS system software is a comprehensive suite of applications designed for advanced data analysis and business intelligence. It provides a powerful platform for managing, analyzing, and visualizing data from a variety of sources. The core function of the SAS system software is to enable users to extract meaningful insights and make informed decisions based on their data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

48 protocols using sas system software

1

Kinetics of [18F]SPA-RQ Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used with the factors treatment (nonmedicated, premedicated) and time (15, 60, 180 and 360 min after injection of [18F]SPA-RQ) and their interaction. Square-root- and log-transformations were used to meet assumptions of ANOVA. If the interaction was not significant it was removed from analysis and only main effects were included in the final model. For simplicity, mean ± SD are used in figures. The analyses were performed with SAS System software, version 9.3 for Windows (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Differences in [18F]SPA-RQ uptake between GPs and rats were tested with an unpaired t-test and calculations carried out with use of GraphPad Prism software v. 6.07 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences were considered significant if p < 0.05 (two-tailed).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chlorhexidine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analyzed by SAS System software (SAS Institute Inc., release 9.3, 2012, Cary, NC, USA). The assumption of equality of variances and normal distribution of errors was checked and the Tukey–Kramer (bacterial viability and acidogenicity of S. mutans and CHX quantification in P. gingivalis culture medium) and Tukey test (bacterial viability of P. gingivalis, CHX quantification in S. mutans culture medium) were used to compare the means of significant effects with the significance level fixed at 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Categorical and Continuous Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables are presented as number and percentages and compared by the chi-square test. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation (SD), except for the statin dosages, which are reported as median and inter-quartile range (IQR) and were compared by the analysis of variance (ANOVA), if normally distributed, or by the Kruskall–Wallis test, if not. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All tests were 2-sided. Analyses were performed with SAS system software, version 9.4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SAS system software (version 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). All the data in each experiment was subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means were compared by Duncan's multiple range test. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Hypoglycemia Risk Factors Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used Fisher exact test to determine the difference between patients with or without hypoglycemia, according to patient characteristics. After calculating differences in hypoglycemia incidence and its 95% confidence intervals (CI) among subgroups, we calculated number needed to harm (NNH) by the inverse of incidence difference between subgroups. Among subgroups having statistically significant differences, we calculated multivariate adjusted relative risk estimates and 95% CI by using negative binomial regression model. All statistical tests were two-sided at α = 0.05. All statistical calculations were performed using SAS system software, version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and R 2.15.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Subclinical Ketosis Diagnosis in Ewes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biochemical parameters, BCS, DIM, parity and milk fatty acids data were analyzed using the SAS system software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA). A one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the differences of the total lipid fraction within the two groups (BHB0 vs. BHB1). This test was used to select the parameters with a predictive power in order to diagnose subclinical ketosis or hyperketonemia. The hypotheses of linear model on the residuals were graphically assessed.
The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) (MedCalc Sofware Ltd., Ostend, Belgium) curves were performed to establish threshold value of each predictive biochemical parameter or forecast milk fatty acids. The ROC curves were derived from the analysis of data of all experimental animals (BHB0-BHB1) with the discriminant of ewes with BHB > 0.86 mmol/L (BHB1) [9 ,11 ]. The area under the curve (AUC) shows the diagnostic power of the test. Therefore, the optimal cut-off of each parameter based on Youden criterion, was calculated to discriminate the subclinical ketosis or hyperketonemia groups in ewes in early phase of lactation. Statistical significance was set at p-value ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two arms at a ratio of 1:1. The randomization list will be computer-generated by the study statistician using SAS system software (version 9.2, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The randomization process will be centralized through a secured website managed by the Bordeaux University Hospital Clinical Trial Unit (CTU) («Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologique (USMR)»). After confirmation of the patient’s eligibility criteria, the investigator will access the website of the CTU, which will provide the patient’s unique allocation number and randomization group. Access to the final dataset will be limited to the investigators.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis for Vascular Complications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize baseline data for categorical variables and means with standard deviations (SD) for normally distributed continuous variables. Medians and interquartile ranges were used to describe non-parametric data. Two-sided Student t-tests were used to compare continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher exact tests for discrete variables. A backward “stepwise” multivariable regression technique was used to determine the independent clinical, procedural and angiographic predictors of major VCs. Variables showing a significant multivariable association with VCs (p < 0.05) were kept in the final model. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS System software, version 9.2 or later (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC USA). Receiver operator curves were generated to identify the best cut-off for SEIAR and SFAR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Predictors of Adverse Cardiac Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables were reported as numbers and percentages and compared by χ2 test. Continuous variables were reported as mean and SD, and compared by t-test, if normally distributed, or as median and IQR, and compared by Mann-Withney U test, if not.
Multivariable analysis (Cox regression) was performed in order to identify the independent predictors of NACE at 6 months, considering the following variables of clinical interest: CHA2DS2-VASc score (as continuous), type of ACS at discharge (STEMI vs NSTE-ACS), UDOAC versus IDOAC strategy and eGFR ≥50 versus <50 mL/min. Kaplan-Meier curves for MACE and NACE at 6 months from hospital admission were produced and compared by log-rank test.
All tests were two sided. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All the analyses were performed with SAS system software, V.9.4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Fungal Strains for Kudzu Bug Control

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Computations for all experiments were performed using SAS system software [25 ]. A randomized complete block design with factorial arrangements was used for each group of insects as follow: 2 × 5 × 3 (young adults) and 3 × 5 × 3 (old adults) for mortality (strains: NI8 and GHA; concentrations: n × 107, n × 106, n × 105, n × 104 spores/mL; and evaluation times: 3, 5, and 10 days after sprayed) and 2 × 5 (young adults) and 3 × 5 (old adults) for sporulation (strains: NI8, GHA, and KUDSC; and concentrations: same as above). Each treatment combination was repeated four times. Nonparametric estimates of the survival function of kudzu bugs were compared between treatments using PROC LIFETEST [25 ]. Statistical differences in the survival of M. cribraria were declared based on the log-rank statistic. Mortality and infection were analyzed by using PROC GLM to detect differences between treatments for each group of insects. Mortality and sporulation data for each group of insects and each strain were analyzed by PROBIT [25 ] using common logarithm (log to the base 10) of the concentration value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!