The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using h550s microscope

1

Chromosomal Characterization of Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromosomal preparations were obtained from bone marrow [11 ], and C-banding [12 (link)], G-banding [13 (link)], and FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization) using telomeric (ONCOR) and rDNA 45S probes [14 (link)] were performed. All techniques were adapted from the original protocols. Classic cytogenetic images were obtained using an Olympus BX41 microscope (bright field/phase) with a digital camera CCD 1300QDS, and analyzed using SpectraView software (Applied Spectral Imaging). FISH images were obtained using a Nikon H550S microscope, and analyzed using Nis-Elements software. Chromosomes morphology was classified according to Levan et al. [15 ] with modifications.
The map was made using QUANTUM-GIS (QGIS) program version 3.6 Database were obtained from DIVA [16 ] and IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) [17 –19 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Obtaining and Analyzing Karyotypes Using Microscopy Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digital images of C- and G-banded karyotypes were obtained using an Olympus BX41 microscope with a CCD 1300QDS digital camera and analyzed using GenASIs software version 7.2.7.34276 from ASI (Applied Spectral Imaging). FISH images were obtained using a Nikon H550S microscope, a DS-Qi1Mc digital camera, and the Nis-Elements software. The karyotypes were organized according to established chromosomal morphology [70 (link)]. The final images were edited using Adobe Photoshop CS6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Particle Size Analysis of Emulsions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oil particle size and distribution were analysed using the Mastersizer 3000 with a Hydro EV unit (Malvern Analytical Ltd., Malvern, UK). The emulsion was added drop-wise to water until laser obscuration reached 9.5–10.5%, maintaining a constant pump speed of 2400 rpm. Refractive indices of 1.330 and 1.478 were used. Average particle size distribution was calculated from five runs, with formulations characterised by percentile values (D10, D50, and D90).
For microscopic examination, samples were observed using a Nikon H550S microscope (Nikon, Chiyoda-ku, Japan) at 10× objective magnification. Images were captured with the NIS-Elements D3.2 program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Particle Observation under Microscope

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The observation
of solid particles was performed in a NIKON H550S microscope under
environmental conditions. The particles were simply collected over
a glass plate and directly observed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Karyotyping with Digital Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used an Olympus BX41 microscope with a CCD 1300QDS digital camera to obtain digital images from G-banded and C-banded karyotypes, which were analyzed using the GenASIs software v. 7.2.7.34276. A Nikon H550S microscope with a DS-Qi1Mc digital camera captured the FISH images, which were analyzed using Nis-Elements software. The karyotypes were organized according to literature57 (link). The final images were edited using Adobe Photoshop software v. 22.1.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Human Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues for IHC were harvested from MoM and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hour at 4°C, embedded in paraffin, cut into 5-μm sections and mounted onto poly-L-lysine coated glass slides. Following paraffin removal, antigen retrieval (DIVA Decloaker, Biocare Medical, Cat. DV2004.) and blocking of non-specific Ig-binding sites (Background Sniper, Biocare Medical), tissue sections were stained with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C and developed with a biotin-free horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-polymer system (MACH3 Mouse HRP-Polymer Detection, Biocare Medical). All tissue sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin. Primary antibodies directed against CD45 LCA (2B11&PD7/26, Dako), CD3 (SP7, Thermo Scientific), CD20 (L26, Biocare Medical) and CD68 (KP1, Dako) were used to identify human cells in the spleen, liver and lung. For comparison, tissue sections were stained with mouse IgG1k or IgG2a isotype controls. Light microscopy images were taken with a Nikon H550S microscope at 40×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histological Analysis of Cell-Seeded Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell-seeded scaffolds from the three chosen time points (7, 14, and 21 days after proliferation period) were fixed in 10% v/v neutral buffered formalin overnight at RT. After fixation, scaffolds were dehydrated in graded ethanol series, immersed in a toluole bath for 5 min, and then embedded in paraffin at 55 °C for 60 min. After blocking, paraffin cubes were cut transversely into 6 μm thick sections using a Leica RM 2235 rotary microtome. Selected sections, from equal distances throughout the whole scaffold, were heated at 60 °C for 30 min, deparaffinized, hydrated, and then stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). Sections were dehydrated and covered. Similar protocol was also used for Alcian Blue staining (solution: 1% w/v pH = 2.5, adjusted with 3% glacial acetic acid of quality level 300, Sigma-Aldrich). After 21 days in culture, semiquantitative evaluation of collagen development was performed by staining the regenerated ECM in scaffolds with Indian ink. Ink has the appropriate chemical and physical properties to stain collagen within tissues [51 (link),56 ]. PBS was mixed with black Indian ink (2:1) for 2 min and then gently applied to the scaffolds with a 22-gauge needle. Stained scaffolds remained in RT for 5 min to equilibrate and were then immersed in PBS 3 times. Scaffolds were then placed on slides and examined with a Nikon H550s microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Human Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues for IHC were harvested from MoM and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hour at 4°C, embedded in paraffin, cut into 5-μm sections and mounted onto poly-L-lysine coated glass slides. Following paraffin removal, antigen retrieval (DIVA Decloaker, Biocare Medical, Cat. DV2004.) and blocking of non-specific Ig-binding sites (Background Sniper, Biocare Medical), tissue sections were stained with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C and developed with a biotin-free horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-polymer system (MACH3 Mouse HRP-Polymer Detection, Biocare Medical). All tissue sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin. Primary antibodies directed against CD45 LCA (2B11&PD7/26, Dako), CD3 (SP7, Thermo Scientific), CD20 (L26, Biocare Medical) and CD68 (KP1, Dako) were used to identify human cells in the spleen, liver and lung. For comparison, tissue sections were stained with mouse IgG1k or IgG2a isotype controls. Light microscopy images were taken with a Nikon H550S microscope at 40×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cytogenetic Analysis Using Microscopy and Image Software

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used an Olympus BX41 microscope and a CCD 1300QDS digital camera to obtain digital images from G-banded and C-banded karyotypes, which were analyzed using the GenASIs software v. 7.2.7.34276. The Nikon H550S microscope with a DS-Qi1Mc digital camera captured the FISH images, which were analyzed using the Nis-Elements software. The karyotypes were organized according to the literature83 (link). The final images were edited using Adobe Photoshop CS6 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cytogenetic Analysis of Female Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromosomal preparations were obtained from the bone marrow in the field (Ford & Harmerton, 1956). As our sample is a female, the definition of the X chromosome was made by comparing it with the literature. The following techniques were applied, with adaptations: G‐banding (Sumner et al., 1971), C‐banding (Sumner, 1972), Ag‐NOR staining (Howell & Black, 1980), and FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization) with telomeric probes (All Human Telomere Probe: Oncor, P5091) (Nagamachi et al., 2013) and 18S rDNA probes (Hatanaka & Galetti, 2004). Images of classic cytogenetics were obtained using an Olympus BX41 microscope (bright field/phase) with a digital CCD 1300QDS camera and analyzed using the SpectraView software (Applied Spectral Imaging). Images of FISH were obtained using a Nikon H550S microscope and analyzed using Nis‐Elements software. The images were edited using the Adobe Photoshop CS4 program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!