The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Excel 2020

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

Excel 2020 is a spreadsheet software application that provides users with a range of tools for organizing, analyzing, and visualizing data. It offers a grid-based interface for inputting and manipulating numeric and textual information, with capabilities for performing various calculations, creating charts and graphs, and automating repetitive tasks.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using excel 2020

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were collected and organized using Microsoft Excel 2020, and statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0 software.
For measurement data, the mean ± standard deviation was used depending on the normality test results. Independent sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA or nonparametric tests were employed for comparison between groups, and linear regression was used for multifactor analysis.
Count data were presented as the number of cases (percentage), and the chi-square test was used for group comparison. Multifactor analysis was performed using logistic regression. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cerebrovascular Disease Nursing Questionnaire

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Questionnaires were distributed by highly trained postgraduate students studying the field of cerebrovascular disease nursing. All data entry was performed by a designated person and checked by two persons. The Excel 2020 and SPSS 20.0 software were used for data entry and statistics. The questionnaire data were entered and removed on the same day; following data entry, all information was confirmed by checking the rationality and logic and rechecking the original scales.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ANOVA-based Multiannual Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were processed using Microsoft Excel 2020 and SPSS20.0. One-way ANOVA was performed, and means were compared using the least significant difference at the 0.05 probability level. The results of 2021 and 2022 were similar. Therefore, the data were presented as the average across the two study years, and the data of both years were deposited as Supplementary Data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Analysis of Data Trends

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microsoft Excel 2020 and SPSS v18.0 software were used for data analysis. Differences between groups were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison test at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Antibody Titers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Excel 2020, SPSS Statistics 21 and Graphpad Prism v8.0 were utilized to perform statistical processing and analyses of the data. Geometric mean titer (GMT) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated, converted to the logarithmic scale and analyzed by using one-way ANOVA, considering p < 0.05 as a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Data Analysis Using Excel, SPSS, and Origin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental data were processed, and graphs were drawn using Excel 2020, SPSS 19.0, Origin 2021, and other software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental data were initially collated using Excel 2020, then analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software (Ver. 20.0 for Windows, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). In the continuous blood glucose monitoring test, a randomized block ANOVA analysis for repeated measures, with a 4 × 9 factorial structure, was performed to investigate the effects of the 4 dietary treatment factors (starch sources) at 9 time points, and any interactions. Tukey's test was applied to indicate significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05). The results of the data analysis are presented as mean and standard error.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Linear Data Fitting and Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental data were conducted using Excel 2020 and SPSS 26 software, and the experimental data were linearly fitted and plotted with origin 2018 software. Each group of experiments was repeated three times, and the mean and standard deviation of the results were calculated. One-way ANOVA was performed using Duncan’s multiple comparison test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical data analyses were performed using Excel 2020 and SPSS 26.0 software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for significant differences between groups of data, while Duncan’s method was used for multiple comparisons. p-value <0.05 indicated significant differences between groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Data Analysis Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were entered and analyzed in Microsoft Excel 2020 and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 20.0, respectively. Qualitative variables were expressed in terms of percentages. McNemars Chi-square test was used for association; the significance level was set at 0.001 and all the results were tailed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!