The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using q150t es coater

1

Microscopic Analysis of Bacterial Carriers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dried carriers with encapsulated predators (obtained from 20 μL drops) were glued with double‐sided carbon sticky tape to an aluminium stub and coated with 3 nm Au–Pd in a Q150TES coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd). To study the characteristic carrier structure, a Jeol IT‐100 SEM (Tokyo, Japan) was used at 20 kV. To visualize the bacteria that reside within the carriers, a Jeol JSM‐7800F high‐resolution SEM (Tokyo, Japan) was used at 2 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CLEM was performed according to protocols established in prior studies as follows7 (link),69 (link). Transfected cells seeded on Grid-500 polymer dishes (Ibidi) and exposed to phagocytic targets were fixed in 4% PFA for 30 min prior to high-resolution confocal and brightfield imaging. After light image acquisition dish was re-fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde/2% PFA/2 mM CaCl2/0.15 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 3 h, dehydrated and embedded in Epon and stained with osmium, ferrous cyanide, lead acetate and uranyl acetate according to standard Autoslice and View protocol provided by FEI7 (link). After sectioning, the polymer grided coverslip was dissolved in xylol for 1 h, and samples were mounted and sputter-coated with gold for 30 s using a Q150T ES coater (Quorum Technologies). Focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) imaging was performed on a Helios NanoLabG3 microscope (FEI). Images were acquired at the highest resolution setting, resulting in 5×5×10 nm pixels using the Autoslice and View software (FEI). Drift correction and alignment were performed using Amira software. Confocal stacks were deconvolved using Imaris (Oxford Instruments). Orthogonal slices and overlay were generated from the aligned stack using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microscopic Analysis of Transfected Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Focused-ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) was performed on a Helios NanoLabG3 microscope (FEI, The Netherlands) as described previously (Nunes-Hasler et al., 2017 (link)). Briefly, transfected cells were seeded on 35-mm Ibidi polymer dishes with gridded bottom (catalog number 81166). Following incubation with the target and fixation with 4% PFA for 20 min at room temperature, brightfield and high-resolution confocal images were captured. Next, samples were fixed for EM with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% PFA in Ca-Caco buffer (2 mM CaCl2, 0.15 M sodium cacodylate, pH 7.4) for 3 h on ice and washed five times in ice-cold Ca-Caco buffer. Following dehydration, samples were embedded on Epon and prepared for FIB-SEM imaging as previously described. Samples were sputter-coated with gold for 30 s by a Q150T ES coater (Quorum Technologies, UK). Cellular footprints obtained from FIB-SEM and fluorescence and brightfield images were compared to locate the cell of interest. Images were acquired at the highest resolution setting (5×5×10 nm) using the Autoslice and View software (FEI). Drift correction and alignment of FIB-SEM images were done using Amira Software and overlay with the fluorescence image using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualizing Melanin in Lichen Thalli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To image melanin of L. pulmonaria by scanning and transmission electron microscopy, thalli were embedded in 3% agarose blocks and cut using a vibratome (Leica VT 1000S, Wetzlar, Germany), resulting in 50 µm cross sections from the upper cortex. The cross sections of pale and melanized lichen thalli were subsequently fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M Na phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and 1% osmium tetroxide, and further dehydrated as described by Daminova et al. (2022) [10 (link)]. Sections were then sputter-coated with gold using the Q150T ES Coater (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK), and anticlinal and periclinal cell walls were viewed using a high-resolution scanning electron microscope (Merlin, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at a voltage of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Elemental Composition Analysis via EDX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses were performed to confirm the elemental composition of the samples and to check for contamination after blasting. The specimens were mounted on aluminum stubs (12.5 mm ø, AGG301, Agar Scientific, UK) and fixed using carbon adhesive discs (12 mm ø, AGG3347N, Agar Scientific, UK). A narrow line of silver paint (G3691, Agar Scientific, UK) was used to enhance the conductivity of the specimens. The specimens were gold‐coated (approximately 5.0 nm) using the Q150T ES coater (Quorum Technologies, UK). The EDX spectra were generated using a LEO Ultra 55 scanning electron microscope at 10 kV (Carl Zeiss, Germany) equipped with an EDX detector (Inca, Oxford, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nanoparticle characterization in membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size and shape of nanoparticles were studied using the Jeol JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope (Tokyo, Japan) combined with the energy-dispersive spectrometer Oxford Instruments INCA Energy TEM 350 (High Wycombe, UK). The size and morphology of nanoparticles into membranes were studied using a scanning electron microscope Tescan MIRA 3 LMU (Brno, Czech Republic). Membranes were coated with gold using Quorum Technologies Q150T ES coater (Laughton, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanoparticle Adsorption on Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the membranes before and after adsorption of the nanoparticles was studied in a Zeiss Ultra PLUS FEG scanning electron microscope (SEM). Samples were dried before being sputter-coated with carbon in a Quorum Q150T ES coater for imaging. SEM energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) was also conducted to understand the distribution and elemental composition of the nanoparticles on the membranes.
The Bruker ALPHA II Compact FT-IR Spectrometer using the OPUS 7.0 software was employed to determine all functional groups likely to be found in the ESM/AgNO3 composite. All samples were dried and grounded prior to the analysis. The chemical state of Ag absorbed on ESM was analyzed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo ESCAlab 250Xi, Monochromatic Al kα, 300W, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nonwoven Fiber Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the nonwovens was investigated by high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM micrographs were recorded using a MIRA3 scanning electron microscope (TESCAN, Brno, Czechia). The nonwoven samples were placed on the stub and, to avoid charging problems, fibers were coated with Pd/Au for 30 s in an argon environment using a Q150T ES coater with turbomolecular pump (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Microparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface micrographs of microparticles of XAA and XSD were carried out in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) model EVO/LS15 (Zeiss, USA) at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV under vacuum conditions. Samples were prepared on stubs with carbon double-sided tape (8 mm × 20 mm) and subjected to a gold coating in a Q150T ES coater (Quorum Technologies, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Correlated Light and Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CLEM was performed as described 7, 78 . Briefly, transfected cells seeded on Grid-500 polymer dishes (Ibidi) and exposed to phagocytic targets were fixed in 4% PFA for 30 min prior to high resolution confocal and brightfield imaging. After light image acquisition dish was re-fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde/2% PFA/2 mMCaCl2/0.15 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 3 h, dehydrated and embedded in Epon, and stained with osmium, ferrous cyanide, lead acetate and uranyl acetate as described 7 . After sectioning the polymer grided coverslip was dissolved in xylol for 1 h, and samples mounted and sputter-coated with gold for 30 sec using a Q150T ES coater (Quorum Technologies). Focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) imaging was performed on a Helios NanoLabG3 microscope (FEI). Images were acquired at the highest resolution setting, resulting in 5x5x10 nm pixels using the Autoslice and View software (FEI). Drift correction and alignment were performed using Amira software.
Confocal stacks were deconvolved using Imaris (Oxford Instruments). Orthogonal slices and overlay were generated from the aligned stack using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!