The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using mouse anti fibronectin

1

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After treatments, cellular proteins were extracted with ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris-HCL, pH 7.5, 150 mM sodium chloride, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 25 mM NaF, 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM NaP4O7, 1 nM phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride) containing protease inhibitors (Complete Protease Inhibitor; Roche, Manheim, Germany) on ice. Total protein concentrations were quantified by a bicinchoninic acid assay (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A total of 10 μg of proteins from each sample were separated by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 4% to 12% gel in MOPS running buffer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane and probed with the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-MMP14, mouse anti-fibronectin, rabbit anti-collagen IV, and mouse anti-GAPDH (Abcam, Boston, MA, USA). HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were used. Bound antibody complexes were detected using FluorChem E (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA, USA). Protein expression was analyzed by densitometry using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health [NIH], Bethesda, MD, USA), and normalized to the housekeeping protein, GAPDH. All experiments were performed in triplicate for each of four donor cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Tissue Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Masson trichrome stain and immunohistochemistry were performed according to common protocols [20 (link)]. For immunohistochemistry, the primary antibodies were employed as follows: rabbit anti-collagen I, rabbit anti-α-SMA, mouse anti-fibronectin, and rabbit anti-CTGF (Abcam). The secondary antibodies incubated were horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit/mouse immunoglobulin G (Boster). All immunohistochemical photographs were analyzed using Image ProPlus (version 6.0, Media Cybernetics) as described previously [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Expression Analysis by SDS-PAGE and Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein expression analysis, a conventional SDS–PAGE followed by protein blotting strategy was performed as described previously [29 (link)]. The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-GAPDH (1:5000, clone GA1R, Thermo Fisher Scientific), rabbit anti-αSMA (1:800, clone 1A4, Biolegend), mouse anti-fibronectin (1:700, polyclonal, Abcam), rabbit anti -TAK (polyclonal 1:1000), rabbit anti-phospho-TAK (polyclonal, 1:1000), anti-Smad2 (clone D43B4, 1:1000) and anti-phosho-Smad2 (clone 138D4, 1:1000, all Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Protein abundance was normalized to GAPDH levels. Results were analyzed with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) according to methods for Western Blot densitometry band quantification through image analysis software with background subtraction [38 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellular proteins were extracted with ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris-HCL, pH 7.5, 150 mM sodium chloride, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 25 mM NaF, 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM NaP4O7, 1 nM phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride) containing protease inhibitors (Complete Protease Inhibitor, Roche, Manheim, Germany) on ice. Proteins were quantified by bicinchoninic acid assay (Thermo Fischer Scientific). 20 μg of proteins from each sample were separated by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 4–12% gel in MOPS running buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific), transferred onto a PVDF membrane and probed with the following primary antibodies rabbit anti-myocilin (Sigma Aldrich), mouse anti-αB-crystallin, mouse anti-fibronectin, rabbit anti-collagen IV and mouse anti-β-actin (Abcam). HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Invitrogen) were used. Bound antibody was detected using FluorChem E (Protein Simple). Protein expression was analyzed by densitometry using ImageJ, and normalized to the housekeeping gene β-actin. All experiments were performed in duplicate for each of three donor cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!