The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Axioskop 2 plus

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany, United States, Japan, United Kingdom

The Axioskop 2 Plus is a compound microscope designed for a wide range of applications in life science and materials research. It features an advanced optic system, providing high-resolution imaging and contrast enhancement capabilities. The microscope is equipped with a variety of illumination options, including transmitted and reflected light, to accommodate different specimen types. The Axioskop 2 Plus is a versatile and reliable tool for researchers and scientists in various fields of study.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

394 protocols using axioskop 2 plus

1

Pollen Viability Assay and Anther Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To test the pollen viability, mature florets before flowering were fixed in 70% (v/v) ethanol and then anthers from the florets were dissected and stained with 1% (w/v) I2‐KI on a glass slide. The number of the viable pollen grains (deeply stained and round shaped) and inviable pollen grains (lightly stained, small and shrivelled) was counted under a bright field microscope (Axioskop 2 Plus; Zeiss). Three shots were selected for each slide for the statistics of I2‐KI staining rate of pollen grains.
For histological analysis, anthers of different developmental stages were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.025 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) overnight at 4 °C. The samples were washed in PBS and dehydrated by washing them through conventional ethanol series of 30 min each and embedded in HISTORESIN (LEICA, cat#702218500) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 4‐μm sections were cut with a Leica microtome and stained with 0.1% toluidine blue, then observed and photographed with Zeiss Axioskop 2 Plus fluorescence microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterizing Protein Fibril Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein fibril formation was checked by fluorescence microscope (Axioskop 2 plus, Ziess, Germany. First, the proteins were dissolved in buffer A at a concentration of 2 mg/mL and incubated at 60 °C in the presence of 1 M GdnHCl for 4 days. After the incubation period, protein samples were prepared at a concentration of 0.15 mg/mL and incubated with 20 μM ThT for 5 min. Then, the green filter (GPF) was used with an excitation wavelength of 469 nm and an emission wavelength of 525 nm to observe the protein fibrils under the fluorescence microscope17 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescent Live/Dead Assay for Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent staining ethidium bromide (EB)/acridine orange (AO) (Sigma-Aldrich) was performed to assess rates of cellular viability (Live/Dead). Initially cells were seeded in 6 well (monolayer) and 24 well (spheroids) cell culture plates and treated with IC50 concentration of ZEO for 24 h. then cells and spheroids washed with PBS, after which, a solution containing EB/AO was added, the stained cells were immediately visualized and imaged under an fluorescence microscope (Axioskop 2 plus, Ziess, Germany). The differentiation between viable, apoptotic, and necrotic cells is based on the difference between dye permeability into intact cell membrane. Green cells represent viable cells and are stained only with AO, green and orange cells with condensed chromatin represent early and late apoptotic cells and are stained with both AO and EB (with moderate alteration in membrane permeability), finally necrotic cells are orang and stained with EB. Ten photos were taken of randomly selected areas of the stained slides to ensure that the data obtained were representative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Cancer Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the rates of cellular viability, fluorescent staining (with EtBr/AO (Sigma-Aldrich)) was performed. The permeability of EtBr and AO in the cells is based on the difference between membrane permeability into alive, apoptotic and necrotic cells. Monolayer MDA-MB231 were seeded in a 6-well cell culture plates containing 3 ml of complete medium. After 24 h, the cells were treated with IC50 of OEO and thymol. Following washing with PBS, a mixture of EtBr/AO (100 mg/ml) was added to the cells. The stained cells were visualized by a fluorescence microscope (Axioskop 2 plus, Ziess, Germany)74 (link),75 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Subcellular Localization of MaWRKY26 and MaVQ5

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vectors for subcellular localization assay were constructed by sub-cloning the coding regions of MaWRKY26 and MaVQ5 into the pEAQ-HT-GFP vector (kindly supplied by Dr. George P. Lomonossoff), resulting in MaWRKY26-GFP and MaVQ5-GFP, respectively. Primers used are shown in Supplementary Table S1. The fusion constructs and control vector were electroporated into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 using Gene PulserXcellTM Electroporation Systems (Bio-Rad, CA). Tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) leaf infiltration assay for sub-cellular localization was performed as described previously66 (link). After infiltration, plants were incubated at 22 °C with 16 h photoperiod for at least 2 days before analysis. GFP fluorescence signals were observed with a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axioskop 2 Plus). All transient expression assays were repeated at least three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Subcellular Localization of Transcription Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The full-length coding sequences of MibZIP66 and MibHLH45 without the stop codon were amplified using PCR and cloned into the GFP vector, under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter. The vector constructs of 35S-MibZIP66-GFP and 35S-MibHLH45-GFP were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 through electroporation and then injected into tobacco leaves. MiPSY1 or the control vector (pYBA1132) plasmid was co-transformed with a plasmid coding for a mitochondrial marker red fluorescent protein (RFP) into Arabidopsis protoplasts by polyethylene glycol (PEG) transformation method according to Lister et al. (2007 (link)). Localizations of MiPSY1, MibZIP66, and MibHLH45 were examined using a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axioskop 2 Plus; Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Muscle Fiber Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10-μm TA sections were blocked in 5% BSA (Fisher Scientific), stained with Alexa Fluor 488 wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen Detection Technologies), and mounted in Vectashield Hard Set with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Images were captured using a Zeiss Axioskop 2 Plus fluorescence microscope, a Zeiss AxioCam HRc digital camera, and Axiovision 4.8 software or an Olympus FluoviewFV1000 laser-scanning biological confocal microscope using the Olympus Micro FV10-ASW 3.1 software. CLN percentage and Feret’s minimal diameter were measured after stitching together images to recreate a montage of the entire TA muscle section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Myogenic Differentiation and Fusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody against MHC (MF-20 Hybridoma Bank); nuclei were visualized using Hoechst staining. Samples were viewed under an inverted microscope (Axioskop 2 plus; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging Inc.). To quantify the differentiation and fusion of control and TSA treated we calculated the differentiation index as the percentage of MHC-positive cells above total nuclei and the fusion index as the average number of nuclei in MHC-positive cells with at least three nuclei above total number of nuclei, respectively. The images were analyzed using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Histopathological Analysis of Liver and Pancreas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The liver and pancreas of the rats were fixed in 4% neutral buffered formalin and dehydrated with graded ethanol. Each tissue was embedded in paraffin, and 5 μm cross-sections were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The histopathological profiles were observed using an optical microscope (Axioskop 2 plus, Carl Zeiss, Hamburg, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Histopathological Analysis of Liver Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After each collection of biological samples, we measured the body weight and liver weight. The spleen weight was measured only after 26 and 30 weeks p.i. The liver was carefully dissected and placed in 10% buffered formalin (Biovitrum, Russia). After fixation overnight at 4 °C, the specimens were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions and then absolute ethanol, cleared in xylene, and soaked in melted paraffin. Then we embedded the specimens in paraffin using Microm (Microm, UK). Four-μm-thick slices were prepared by means of a microtome.
For histopathological analysis, the tissue slices were stained with hematoxylin and eosin by the standard method. Pathological changes were graded semiquantitatively according to previously described methods [20 (link),27 (link),28 (link)]. The finished slides were examined under a light microscope (Axioskop 2 Plus; Zeiss, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!