The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

2 639 protocols using whatman no 1 filter paper

1

Koji Extraction and Purification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The koji prepared in this study was milled and diluted with distilled water at a ratio of 1:10 (w/v). The diluted samples were mixed for 1 h using a shaker, centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min, and then filtered using Whatman® No.1 filter paper for primary filtration and a 0.45 μm syringe filter for secondary filtration.
The paste made from koji was freeze-dried, milled, diluted with 95% EtOH at a ratio of 1:5 (w/v), and extracted over 24 h. After centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was filtered using Whatman® No.1 filter paper for primary filtration and a 0.45 μm syringe filter for secondary filtration. Afterward, the supernatant was concentrated using a speed vacuum (EYELA, Japan) for 48 h and dissolved in 20% DMSO. The sauce was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and filtered using Whatman® No.1 filter paper for primary filtration and a 0.45 μm syringe filter for secondary filtration. Each koji, paste, and sauce extract was applied to all the experiments in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extraction and Characterization of Plant Bioactives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 30g of powdered A. vera was macerated with ethanol at room temperature for 72 h, filtered through Whatman No. 1 paper filter, and then separated part was evaporated at 65°C in rotary until complete dryness.
Fifty grams of the powdered leaves of henna was soaked in 500 mL of 70% ethanol, macerated for 24 h and filtered (Whatman No. 185); the filtrate was then evaporated at 65°C in rotary evaporator until complete dryness.
Fifty grams of the powdered shoots of A. capillus-veneris was soaked in 300 mL of methanol at room temperature for 72 h and then filtered through with Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The filtrates were collected in separate flasks and were evaporated at 65°C in rotary evaporator until complete dryness.
Fifty grams of the dried powder of C. molmol oleo-gum-resin was soaked in 200 mL of methanol with continuous shaking for 24h at 40°C. The crude extracts were filtered by means of Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The filtrates were collected in separate flasks and were evaporated at 65°C in rotary evaporator until complete dryness. Dried extracts were powdered and kept at 4°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phosphate Analysis in Soil, Bone, and Water Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 2.5 g of each soil sample (Mahshahr and Ahvaz soil, Iran) was placed into a beaker, 50 mL of water was added and shaken for 30 min. It was then filtered using a Whatman filter paper No. 1 and diluted to 50 mL with water. An appropriate volume of this solution was used for phosphate analysis.
The bone sample (chicken and sheep bones) was washed and dried in an electric oven at 100°C. After cooling, it was then cut into small pieces and powdered. One gram of each bone sample was placed into a porcelain crucible and ashed in a furnace. The obtained ash was thoroughly mixed with water and then filtered using Whatman filter paper No. 1 and diluted to 25 mL with water. 1 An appropriate volume of this solution was analyzed using the procedure for phosphate determination.
Water samples were collected in glass bottle from different places (Karoon River, Ahvaz tap water and Mahshahr Petrochemical Refinery wastewater, Iran) boiled for a few minutes and filtered using Whatman filter paper No. 1. An aliquot of the filtrate was used to determine phosphate by the above procedure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Antioxidant Evaluation of A. tripedale

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A. tripedale was collected in May 2018 from Sanandaj, Kurdistan province, western Iran. The herb identified by a botanist and a specimen (No. 404) was deposited in the Hamadan Research and Education Center for Agricultural and Natural Resources. Fifteen g of the shade-dried plant was crushed, extracted with ethanol 50%, and filtered through a Whatman No.1 filter paper. The solution was concentrated by rotary evaporator under vacuum. The hydroalcoholic extract was suspended in methanol and filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper for separation of methanol soluble compounds. The extract was fractionated on a silica gel column eluted sequentially with hexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol. The antioxidant capacity of all fractions (hexane, ethyl acetate, methanolic, and hydroalcoholic fractions) was determined by ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) method to choose the best fraction for further studies. High quantity of selected fraction was prepared and kept at 4 °C until in vivo studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Extraction of Aspergillus tamarii Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The well grown A. tamarii cultivated on potato dextrose broth (PDB) and it was inoculated into 500 mL Erlenmeyer conical flask containing broth and incubated at 28 °C ± 2 °C for 14 days. Then, the mycelium was filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper, mycelia was added to ethyl acetate solvent for macerating purpose. After 7 days, the mixture was filtered via. Whatman No.1 filter paper and the process were repeated as twice. The obtained mycelia extracts were concentrated in a rotary evaporator at reduced pressure. After reaching the boiling point of each solvent, the extracts yield was weighed [48 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of Turbinaria triquetra Seaweed Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seaweed extraction for HPLC analysis: A nanopowder of Turbinaria triquetra seaweed (1 g) was rinsed in 10 mL methanol 70% in glass bottles. Bottles were shaken for 24 h at room temperature in an orbital shaker (Heidolph—Unimax 2010-Germany). The extract was filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper; the residue was washed two times with an aliquot of methanol 70% and filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The net filtrate was adjusted to 10 mL with methanol 70%. HPLC analysis of the 70% methanol extract was carried out using HPLC (Agilent technologies, 1260 Infinity- Mundelein, IL, USA). A 4.6 mm × 250 mm i.d., 5 m, Eclipse C18 column was used for separation. Water (A) and 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (B) were the components of the mobile phase, which had a flow rate of 0.9 mL/min. The mobile phase was programmed consecutively in a linear gradient as follows: 0 min (82% A); 0–5 min (80% A); 5–8 min (60% A); 8–12 min (60% A); 12–15 min (82% A); 15–16 min (82% A); or 16–20 (82% A). The multi-wavelength detector was detected at 280 nm. Injection volume was 5 μL of the sample solutions and the column was kept at a constant temperature of 40 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Aqueous and Methanolic Bark Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the aqueous extract, the dried bark of Z. armatum was converted into a fine powder, of which 50 g was added to 300 mL of deionized water and kept at RT for 15 days. The resulting extract after filtering by Whatman No.1 filter paper was used for preparing the AgNPs. For the methanolic bark extract, 50 g of its powder was added to 300 mL of methanol and kept for 15 days at RT. The obtained extract, after filtering (Whatman No.1 filter paper) and drying by rotary evaporator under reduced pressure, was used for the experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Nitrosyl Hemochrome and Total Pigment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nitrosyl hemochrome and total pigment was determined using a method described by
Hornsey (1956) (link). For nitrosyl
hemochrome determination, 10 g of each cooked sample was blended with 40 mL
acetone and 3 mL distilled, deionized water using a homogenizer (DI 25 basic,
Kinematica AG, Luzern, Switzerland). The samples were kept in the dark for 15
min and filtered through a Whatman No. 1 filter paper, and then, absorbance of
the filtrate at 540 nm (A540) was determined using a
spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The nitrosyl hemochrome
concentration (ppm) was calculated as A540×290. For the total
pigment measurement, 10 g of each cooked sample was blended with 40 mL acetone,
1 mL HCl, and 2 mL distilled, deionized water, which was allowed to stand in the
dark at 2°C–3°C for 1 h and filtered through a Whatman No.
1 filter paper. Absorbance was measured at 640 nm (A640). The total
pigment concentration (ppm) was calculated as A640×680.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Extraction of Centella asiatica Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh C. asiatica aerial parts was obtained locally and processed as previously reported.26 (link) The plant sample was washed with tap water and rinsed with reverse osmosis water. The aerial parts were air-dried to reduce moisture content for 12 hour and further oven dried at 60 °C for another 12 hours. The dried sample was ground into fine powder and stored in an opaque bottle at −20 °C for further extraction.
Dried C. asiatica powder (50 g) was extracted using 500 mL of ethanol/water mixture (80 : 20 v/v) for 2 hours while gently stirring with an overhead stirrer. The mixture was filtered using a Buchner funnel overlaid with Whatman No 1 filter paper. The collected marc was re-extracted. The combined filtrate was concentrated using rotary evaporator at 40 °C to one-third of its original volume. Thereafter, the filtrate was kept at 4 °C overnight. A clear supernatant was obtained and subjected to reduced pressure in a speed-vac in order to remove any residual organic solvent. The mixture was filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper under gravity and then lyophilized to give a light brown powder (Fig. 1) hereafter referred to as C. asiatica phenolic extract (CAPE). CAPE was stored at −20 °C protected from light.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from O. sanctum Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast extract sucrose (YES) broth was prepared by adding yeast extract, 20 g/L; sucrose, 40 g/L; magnesium sulfate, 0.5 g/L into a 2L beaker containing 1000 mL of host plant water extract. Before that, host plant water extract was prepared by boiling 2.0 g fine powdered O. sanctum leaves material (host plant) in 1000 mL distilled water and filtered with Muslin cloth, followed by Whatman No. 1 filter paper. Two actively growing pure mycelial agar plugs were then inoculated into a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 mL of YES broth and incubated at 30°C for 16 days under dark and static conditions. After the cultivation period, the cultures were filtrated using Whatman No. 1 filter paper and the separated fungal biomass and fermentative broth were extracted thrice with an equal volume of ethyl acetate extract and methanol (1:1; v/v). Both extracts were concentrated under reduced pressure to dryness by a rotary evaporator and dried in a fume hood to obtain a dried crude paste (13 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!