The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genegnome

Manufactured by Syngene
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, India

The GeneGnome is a laboratory instrument designed for high-performance DNA and RNA analysis. It provides accurate and reliable quantification and quality assessment of nucleic acid samples. The core function of the GeneGnome is to enable researchers to conduct advanced molecular biology experiments and studies.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

36 protocols using genegnome

1

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis for DNA Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 2

Agarose gel electrophoresis was performed according to Sambrook (Sambrook, Russell et al. 2000 Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual (third edition), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press) using gels of 50 ml, in 1×Tris Acetate EDTA buffer. DNA was visualized by the inclusion of ethidium bromide in the gel and observation under UV light. Gel images were recorded by a CCD camera and an image analysis system (GeneGnome; Syngene, via Westburg B.V., Leusden, The Netherlands).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phosphorylation Profiling of Adult Worm Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A lithium dodecyl sulfate (LDS) sample buffer (5x) (Invitrogen) was mixed with the adult worm homogenate and samples were heated to 95°C for 5 min, sonicated for 30 s, and equal amounts of protein (15 μg) electrophoresed on 10% Precise sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide electrophoresis gels (Invitrogen). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, blocked in 5% non-fat dried milk, washed in Tween-Tris-buffered saline (TTBS) and incubated in overnight at 4°C in phospho-PKA substrate (#9624, CST), phospho-PKC substrate (#2261, CST), or phospho-Akt substrate (#9614, CST) motif antibodies. Blots were then washed in TTBS, incubated in horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (CST; 1:3000; 2 h), and visualized using West Pico (Thermo Scientific) substrate on a GeneGnome (Syngene) chemiluminescence imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chemiluminescent Western Blot Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For chemiluminescence detection, WB membranes were incubated in the dark with ECL Reagent (Cell Signaling), which is a luminol-based enhanced chemiluminescence substrate for peroxidase. The luminescent signal was recorded and quantified with the GeneGnome (Syngene, Frederick, MD, USA). The luminescent signals were detected and transmitted to the GeneTools software (Syngene, Frederick, MD, USA) for analysis and documentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Immune Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein samples were lysed in RIPA buffer (Beyotime) supplemented with 1% proteinase inhibitors (Beyotime). The protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit (Beyotime). Equal amounts of proteins (10 µg) were separated on an 8% SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) gel and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF; Millipore) membranes. The membranes were then blocked in rapid blocking solution and incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The following antibodies were used: CD4 (1:1,000), CD8 (1:1,000), CD3(1:1,000), CX3CL1(1:1000, GAPDH (1:1,000). Finally, the membranes were incubated with HRP−conjugated secondary antibody (1:1,000) for 2 h at room temperature. The immunoblots were visualized using the Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate, and the bands were quantified, relative to GAPDH, by densitometric analysis (GeneGnome, Syngene UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Extracellular Matrix Proteases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates from cells cultured on polyacrylamide gels were prepared with radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (89900, Thermo-Fisher) and a protease inhibitor cocktail (78440, Thermo-Fisher) for 10 minutes on ice. Lysates were sonicated and clarified by centrifugation at 9600 × G, at 4 °C for 10 minutes. Protein concentration was determined by DC protein assay (500-0116, Bio-Rad). Samples were separated by 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% Bovine Serum albumin (BSA, A8022, Sigma) and 0.1% Tween-20(P1379, Sigma) in PBS for 30 minutes. Primary antibodies were prepared in blocking solution and incubated overnight at 4 °C (MMP-2 – sc-10736, Santa Cruz, MMP-9 – sc-10737, Santa Cruz, Timp-1 – sc-5538, Santa Cruz, HSC70 – sc-7298, Santa Cruz). The membrane was washed three times in 0.1% Tween-20/PBS and incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 hour. Following three washes in 0.1% Tween-20/PBS, membranes were developed using Luminata crescendo HRP substrate (WBLUR0100, Millipore) and Syngene GeneGnome. Band intensities were analysed via the band densitometry plugin in ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Stress Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein concentration in the samples was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific). Samples were then prepared with loading buffer and denatured by incubating samples at 100°C for 5 min. For western blot analyses, 30 μg total protein was loaded on bis-acrylamide gels and separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Samples were then transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore) and blocked with 5% (w/v) non-fat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline (pH 8.0) for 1 h. The appropriate primary antibodies were added: Grp78/BiP (BD Biosciences) (PERK, phospho-PERK (Thr980), IRE1α, eIF2α, phospho-eIF2α (Ser51), PDI, and CHOP; 1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology) and membranes were incubated at 4°C overnight, washed and then and subsequently probed with HRP-linked anti-rabbit IgG or anti-mouse IgG antibodies (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology) 1 h at room temperature. Secondary antibodies were detected using HRP-linked chemiluminescence with SuperSignal West Dura Chemiluminescence Substrate (Thermo Scientific) and imaged using the chemiluminescence imaging system (GeneGnome, Syngene). The signal for the target protein of each sample was quantified using densitometry (Image J Software) and expressed in arbitrary unit (AU). GAPDH (1:2000, Thermo Scientific) or β-actin (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology) was used to confirm equal protein loading across samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analysis of Pfs48/45 Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis of plant produced Pfs48/45 and Pfs48/45-10C were performed as described previously24 (link). The FLAG tagged Pfs48/45-10C and Pfs48/45 variants were detected using anti-FLAG mAbs (Cat. No. 637301, BioLegend) or the anti-Pfs48/45 mAb (MRA-316) antibody. Native PAGE of FLAG tagged Pfs48/45 or Pfs48/45-10C variants is performed using native samples and running buffers without denaturants or SDS as described previously24 (link). The images of the protein bands were taken using the GeneSnap software on a GeneGnome and were quantified using the Gene Tools software (Syngene Bioimaging, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Extraction and Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein extraction, cells were grown in synthetic media until late logarithmic phase (cell density about 107 cells/ml) and collected with centrifugation (about 107 cells for alkaline lysis [64 (link)] or about 2×108 cells for mechanical cell disruption [65 (link)]). As alkaline lysis allows to achieve higher protein concentration [64 (link)] and reduced degradation (compare S2A and S2B Fig), but due to the procedure requires sample boiling, it was used to check protein production, while mechanical cell disruption was used to assess protein aggregation.
SDS-PAGE [57 ] or SDD-AGE [27 (link)] was used for separation of the proteins, and PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare) were used for semi-dry [57 ] or capillary transfer [66 ], respectively. Blots were probed with either anti-732-743-Sch9 and anti-phospho-Thr737-Sch9 [67 (link)] or anti-Tag(CGY)FP (Evrogen AB121) antibodies and photographed with GeneGnome (SynGene).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 2

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis

Agarose gel electrophoresis was performed according to Sambrook (Sambrook J. and Russel, D. V. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor, 2000) using gels of 50 ml, in 1× Tris Acetate EDTA buffer. DNA was visualized by the inclusion of ethidium bromide in the gel and observation under UV light. Gel images were recorded by a CCD camera and an image analysis system (GeneGnome; Syngene, via Westburg B. V., Leusden, The Netherlands).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Expression Analysis by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm the array data findings, and to examine other proteins of interest, samples were examined for total and phosphorylated protein expression using protein immuno-blotting (Western Blotting, WB) using a standard protocol. Details of the methodology are shown in Supplementary material 2. All antibodies used for WB are shown in Supplementary Table 2. We used the total expression of each individual phospho experiment as the loading control, as per previous work. In the experiments where we had no totals, β-actin was used as a loading control. In terms of exposure times, we used an automated system (GeneGnome, Syngene, Cambridge, UK) that set the optimal exposure timepoints; it was not something that could be edited by us.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!