The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using primestar max premix 2

1

Cultivation and Genetic Profiling of Lingzhi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The strains and the fruit bodies (part of) cultivated by the strain from the main producing areas of G. lingzhi in China were investigated. Fifteen fruit bodies and 22 strains of Lingzhi were collected (Additional file 1: Table S1). Strains were inoculated into the sterilized liquid fermentation medium (PD, autoclaved at 121 °C and 98 kPa for 20 min) in the shaker at 27 °C, 150 rpm for 9 days. Samples were then centrifuged at 8000 rpm to discard the medium, and mycelia were washed with pure water three times and prepared for use.
The TaKaRa MiniBEST Plant Genomic DNA Extraction Kit and PCR mix [Prime STAR Max Premix (2 ×) bought from Takara Biomedical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.] were used for extracting total genomic DNA and PCR of 22 strains, respectively. The ITS primers and PCR protocol were applied as previously described (White et al. 1990 ). The primers synthesized and PCR products sequencing were obtained from Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Splicing Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Complementary DNA was synthesized from total RNA (1 µg) using a Prime-Script RT PCR Kit (Takara Bio Inc.), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The confirmation of the quantification of the splicing variant was performed as previously described [16 (link)]. In detail, total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA, and PCR amplification was performed using PrimeSTAR Max Premix (2) (Takara Bio Inc.), with the primers shown in Supplementary Material, Table S2. Each splicing variant of the PCR product was shown using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer performed with a DNA 1000 LabChip Kit and High sensitivity LabChip Kit (Agilent Technologies Inc.). For semi-quantification, the proportions of splicing variant were calculated using the following formula: proportion = amount of the one product/ (amount of the one product + amount of the other product).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Identification of Streptococcus mutans in Dental Plaque

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seventeen children (aged 3–9 years) participated in this study (ethics committee approval no. EC20-28; Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, Japan). The decayed, missing, and filled tooth indices of these patients ranged from 4 to 16. Plaque was collected from the tooth surface using a sterile excavator, suspended in 1 mL of 0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution, applied to mitis–salivarius agar, and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Rough colonies, characteristic of S. mutans, were isolated. Species in the genus were identified based on the presence or absence of a portion of the htrA gene encoding a surface protease and an intergenic region following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, as reported by Chen et al. [10 (link)]. Genomic DNA was extracted from the culture medium using ISOPLANT (Nippon Gene Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The PCR mixture was prepared by mixing 6 µL PrimeSTAR Max Premix (2×) (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), 10 ng genomic DNA, forward (5′-TCGCGAAAAAGATAAACAAACA-3′) and reverse (5′-GCCCCTTCACAGTTGGTTAG-3′) primers (final concentration of 0.2 µM each), and PCR-grade water. The PCR conditions were as follows: 30 cycles at 98 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 6 s. The PCR products were subjected to MultiNA capillary electrophoresis (MCE-202; Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) to confirm amplification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Molecular Profiling of Antimicrobial Resistance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total DNA of each strain was extracted as a template for PCR amplification [31 (link)]. To analyze the distributions of drug resistance genes and mutants in 120 isolates, the suspected macrolide resistance gene Erm(A)-like, the reported macrolide resistance gene Erm(T), the tetracycline resistance gene tet(M), and lsa(E) (representing the lsa(E)-carrying multiresistance gene cluster) were amplified by PCR, and the QRDRs of gyrA and parC were amplified and sequenced. The primers are shown in Table S3. The 50 µL PCR reaction solution contained 1 µL of DNA, 1 µL of each primer, 25 µL of PrimeSTAR Max Premix (2×) (Takara Biomedical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and 22 µL of deionized distilled water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiplex CRISPR/Cpf1 Targeting in Silkworm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The forward and reverse primers (Table S1) were synthesized by Tsingke (Beijing, China) and were dissolved in deionized water to amplify the upstream and downstream regions of the 4 crRNA targeting sites (Supplementary Notes S1–S4). PCR was performed using 160 ng B. mori pupal gDNA as DNA templates in a 40 µL reaction mixture containing 20 µL PrimeSTAR Max Premix (2×) (TAKARA, Otsu, Japan, Cat. R045A) and 1.2 µL 10 uM forward and reverse primers. The thermal cycle program was as follows: 98 °C for 4 min, 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 15 s, 72 °C for 30 s, and 5 min of final extension at 72 °C, using a S1000 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Each PCR product was mixed with 8 µL 5× DNA Loading Buffer with GelRed (Biomed, Beijing, China, EL107-01), separated by 1% agarose gel via electrophoresis, and purified using a gel extraction kit (OMEGA, Biel, Switzerland, Cat. D2500-02) according to the manufacturer’s manual. The purified DNA was immediately cleaved by Cpf1/crRNA or stored at −20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Overexpression and Knockdown of CHI3L1 in TPC-1 Thyroid Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The human PTC cell line TPC-1 was gifted from the Center for Reproductive Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. The CHI3L1 overexpression plasmid was constructed as previously reported [27 (link)]. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from TPC-1 cells using the RNAeasy kit (Qiagen) and cDNAs were synthesized using PrimeSTAR Max Premix (2×) (Takara R045A). The coding sequence of CHI3L1 was amplified by PCR using CHI3L1-specific primers. The primer sequences are shown in Table S2. The product was subcloned into the eukaryotic expression vector pCDNA3.1-3xflag-C (FITGENE, China). The pCDNA3.1-3xflag vector was used as an empty vector (pCDNAflag) control.
The CHI3L1 short hairpin RNA (shRNA) plasmid was constructed as previously reported [28 (link)]. The primer sequences to generate the CHI3L1 shRNA vector are shown in Table S3. The product was subcloned into the eukaryotic expression vector pmRZip (FITGENE, China). The silencing efficiency of CHI3L1 shRNA was determined by RT-PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiplex PCR for Sand Fly and Leishmania Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For simultaneous detection and identification of sand fly and Leishmania DNA, two primer sets were used for multiplex PCR, ITS1NGSF/ITS1NGSR and SFNGSF/SFNGSR, which amplified a fragment of 343 bp of Leishmania spp. ITS1 and a fragment of 230 bp of sand fly 18S rRNA, respectively. For standardization of our multiplex PCR, different concentrations of SFNGSF and SFNGSR primers (1.0, 0.1, 0.01 and 0.001 µM) were used in the reaction mixture to verify the lowest concentration of primers needed for amplifying the sand fly 18S rDNA fragment. The lowest detection limit of Leishmania DNA was determined using tenfold serial dilutions of pure L. tropica DNA (1–0.00032 ng), which were added to 10 ng of Ph. sergenti DNA and subjected to multiplex PCR. Following optimization, the PCR reaction mixture composed of 12.5 μl of PrimeSTAR Max Premix (2×) (Takara Bio Inc., JP), 1 μM of ITS1NGSF and ITS1NGSR primers, and 0.1 μM of SFNGSF and SFNGSR primers and 2.5 μl of DNA template for a final volume of 25 μl. To validate our assay, 17 DNA reference samples (eight sand fly DNA samples and nine Leishmania DNA samples) were tested (Additional file 1: Table S1), and then all field-collected female sand flies were subjected to multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection and identification of sand flies and Leishmania parasites.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Confirming JFSP Cell Line Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The partial sequence of the JFSP cell line’s 18s rRNA gene was analyzed to confirm its species. The genomic DNA of JFSP cells at the 70th passage was extracted using the TIANamp Genomic DNA Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The partial fragment sequence of the 18s rRNA gene was amplified using specific primers forward (5′-CCTGAGAAACGGCTACCACAT-3′) and reverse (5′-ATCCCGAGGTCCAACTACGAG-3′) (Accession Number: EF126037) designed according to the sequence available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. The 20 μL PCR reaction mixture contained 10 μL of the PrimeSTAR Max Premix (2×) (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan), 1 μL of each primer, 1 μL of the extracted genomic DNA, and 7 μL of the nuclease-free water. The optimum conditions for PCR include initial denaturation at 98 °C for 3 min, 35 cycles at 98 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 5 s, and final elongation at 72 °C for 3 s. PCR products were analyzed on 1% agarose gel and sequenced using Sanger’s sequencing method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Conventional PCR for Genomic DNA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A conventional PCR was conducted in 50-µl reactions using the following components: 25 µl of Prime STAR Max Premix 2×(Takara Bio, DaLian, China), 21 µl of dd H2O, 100 ng of purified gDNA, and 1 µl each of forward and reverse primers (10 µM). The thermal cycling program comprised 94°C for 3 min, followed by 33 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s, and a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. The amplification was performed using an Applied Biosystems Veriti Dx 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Each set of reactions included a positive template control (PTC) and a no-template control (NTC). After amplification, the PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel at 130 V for approximately 30 min and then visualized under a UV transilluminator. The PCR assay was repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isolation and Detection of DTMUV Strain XZ-2012

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DTMUV strain XZ-2012 was isolated and cultured in BHK-21 cells [20 ]. The virus, freeze-thawed three times, was injected in the allantoic cavity of 10-day specific pathogen free (SPF) duck embryos (200 μl of each). The allantoic fluid was collected after 3–4 days post injection (dpi) and detected by RT-PCR. RNA was extracted with the Trizol method (TransGen Biotech, China) and the quality was assessed using an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo, USA). RNA samples with an OD260/280 ratio between 1.8 and 2.0 were reverse transcribed into cDNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ABM, China). Based on the E gene of XZ-2012 strain in Genbank (Accession No.: KM188953), the primers were designed, forward primer sequence 5′-GAAGCGAGCACCTACCACA-3′, and reverse primer sequence 5′-CGCTGATGACCCTGTCCAT-3′. The expected amplified fragment size was 249 bp. 20 μl reaction volume of PCR: Prime STAR Max Premix (2×) (Takara BioTech, China) 10 μl, forward and reverse primer 0.25 μM, cDNA 1 μg, ddH2O 8 μl. The amplification condition: 95 °C 3 min; 95 °C 30 s, 60 °C 30 s, 72 °C 30 s, 35 cycles; 72 °C 10 min. The amplification products were detected by 1% agarose electrophoresis and the positive samples were preserved at − 80 °C for further experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!