The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss for windows 10

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS for Windows 10.0 is a software package designed for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. The software is compatible with the Windows 10 operating system.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

47 protocols using spss for windows 10

1

Statistical Analysis of Categorical and Continuous Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data entry was done with MS Excel, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows 10 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables were evaluated using the Chi-squared test and Pearson’s Chi-squared test to assess statistically significant differences in-between groups. Non-parametric test methods were assessed to investigate location shifts between groups (Mann–Whitney U-test). The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired samples was used to recognize significant changes within both groups. Continuous variables were expressed as absolute mean concentrations ± SD (standard deviation) and the level of significance (α) was set at 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Frequency Comparison of Spontaneous and Induced

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The obtained data were indicated as arithmetic mean (x) ± standard error (SE). Comparison of the difference between the average spontaneous and induced frequencies was performed using Student's t-test. SPSS for windows 10.0 package program was used for the statistical analysis. All p values were two-tailed and accepted significance level was < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multivariate Analysis of Left Atrial Size

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 10. Numerical variables with a normal distribution were presented as the mean ± SE, numerical variables with a skewed distribution as the median, and categorical variables as percentages. For numerical variables, an independent sample t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for intergroup comparisons. The χ2 test and Fisher’s exact tests were used for comparisons of categorical variables. The association between variables was evaluated with the Pearson rank correlation. Subsequently, analysis was undertaken through multivariate logistic regression to assess a set of independent variable predictors of left atrial size. A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Musclin Levels Predict Atrial Fibrillation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 10. Numerical variables with a normal distribution were expressed as the mean ± SD, and numerical variables with a skewed distribution were expressed as the median and interquartile ranges (IQRs). Categorical variables were expressed as percentages. For numerical variables, an independent sample t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for intergroup comparisons. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare categorical variables. The correlations between musclin and other clinical parameters were analyzed with Spearman’s rank correlation test. To obtain the optimal cut-off points of musclin concentrations for predicting AF onset, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Those independent predictors derived from logistic regression were selected and incorporated in logistic regression models. A two-tailed P<0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. For multiple comparisons, Bonferroni adjustment was used to correct P values to <0.025.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Survey Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative data from the questionnaires were analysed using the statistical package, SPSS for Windows 10. Non-parametric tests were used as appropriate. Qualitative data from the surveys were collated and analysed using thematic analysis [12 (link)]. Two researchers independently coded the responses and the initial review indicated that the researchers were in agreement on approximately 90% of initial codes. Divergence of initial codes for the remaining responses was resolved by further review and discussion with a third researcher. The three researchers then discussed and agreed meaningful themes, which were checked against the initial codes and the overall dataset, and amended where necessary. The final themes were subsequently organised into overarching domains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were done by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 10. Data has been expressed as mean ± standard deviation (M±SD). Statistical comparison between groups was performed using one way ANOVA and paired sample t test. The significant level was considered at p = 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Non-Union Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed utilizing SPSS for Windows 10 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Chi-square test was used to evaluate categorical and statistically significant differences between groups, location shifts between groups via non-parametric test methods (Mann–Whitney U-Test). Significant changes within both groups were analyzed via Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples. Correlation analyses were conducted between all variables and the predictive performance of any logistic regression model was evaluated based on the area under the curve (AUC) of the respective ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve. In particular, factors that were included into the regression analysis were the type of non-union, age, utilized type of BMP, method of osteosynthesis and diabetes. Continuous variables are expressed as absolute mean concentrations ± SD (standard deviation) and the level of significance (α) was set at 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Continuous Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows 10.0. All continuous variable values were expressed as Mean±SD. Comparison of means between two groups was performed with student t tests. Comparisons of means among multiple groups were performed with one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc pairwise comparisons using Tukey’s tests. A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SPSS One-way ANOVA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One-way analysis of variance was implemented in SPSS for Windows 10.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows 10.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data values were expressed as means±SD. Comparisons of means among multiple groups were performed with one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc pairwise comparisons using Tukey’s tests. A two-tailed p<0.05 was considered statistically significant in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!