The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

34 protocols using anti ifnγ xmg1.2

1

Multiparametric flow cytometry analysis of immune cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Draining lymph nodes (dLNs) and spleen were triturated and dispersed through a 40 μm strainer and then washed with PBS. After washing, single cell suspension was prepared for flow cytometry analysis [6 (link),33 (link)]. For surface staining, cells were stained by using anti-mouse CD3 (145-2C11, BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA), CD4 (GK1.5, BD Bioscience), CD8 (53-6.7, BD Bioscience), CD11b (M1/70, BD Bioscience), CD11c (N418, BD Bioscience), and Gr-1 (RB6-BC5, BD Bioscience). For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were incubated for 4 hours with PMA (200 ng/mL, Merck, NJ, USA) and ionomycin (500 mg/mL, Merck) in the presence of Golgistop (BD Bioscience). After stimulation, cells were surface stained as described above. Then, cells were re-suspended with 250 μL fixation solution (BD Bioscience) and washed by permeabilization buffer (BD Bioscience). Twenty minutes later, cells were stained with intracellular antibodies, i.e., anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-IL-17A (TC11-18H10, BD Bioscience), anti-GM-CSF (MPI-22E9, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and anti-IL-10 (JES5-16E3, Biolegend) antibodies. For Ki-67 (SoIA15, eBioscience) staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized by transcription factor staining buffer set (eBioscience) for nuclear protein staining. Results were analyzed by FlowJo (Tree star Inc., Oakland, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following combination of fluorescently labeled primary antibodies against cell surface markers and intracellular cytokines were used: anti-CD3 (17A2), anti-CD4 (clones GK1.5 and RM4-5), anti-CD8a (53–6.7), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-CD45R/B220 (RA3-6B2), anti-CD11c (N418), anti-CD103 (M290), anti-Ly6C (HK1.4), anti-I-A/I-E (M5/114.15.2), anti-IL17 (TC11-18H10.1), and anti-IL4 (11B11) from Biolegend, and anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2) and anti-IL-13 (eBio13A) from eBioscience. Cells were analyzed using a LSRII flow cytometer running FACSDiva Software (BD Bioscience) and analyzed using FlowJo Software (Tree Star). Fixable Viability Dye eFluor780 (eBioscience), DAPI or 7-AAD Viability Staining Solution (Biolegend) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions to exclude dead cells from analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells from lymph nodes and spinal cord were isolated as described before [26 ]. For detection of cell surface markers, cells were stained in FACS buffer (PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.1% NaN3) with the following fluorochrome labeled monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD45 (30-F11), anti-CD4 (RM4-5), anti-CD25 (PC61) and anti-CD44 (IM7). For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were incubated for 16 hours with anti-CD3 (0.5 μg/ml). Next, cells were fixed and permeabilized by incubation with Foxp3 Fixation/Permeabilization Buffer (eBioscience) and stained in Permeabilization Buffer (eBioscience) with the following fluorochrome labeled monoclonal antibodies: anti-Foxp3 (FJK-16s), anti-IL-17 (eBio17B7) and anti-IFNγ (XMG1.2). All antibodies were purchased from BD Pharmigen or eBioscience. For cell number quantification, 104 FACSuite FC Beads (BD) were added per sample prior to acquisition. Samples were acquired on FACS Verse (BD). FACS data were analyzed using FlowJo 7.6.5 software (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspension prepared from different organs were stained and acquired on FACSCanto (BD) or BD Fortessa and analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star). Surface phenotype staining was done with the following fluorochrome-conjugated or biotinylated mAbs: anti-CD3 (145-2c11), anti-CD4 (RM5), anti-ICOS (7E.17G9), anti-Thy1.1 (HIS51), anti-CD11c (HL3), anti-F4/80 (BM8), anti-CXCR3 (cxcr3-173), and anti-IFN-γR (2E2). The expression of Foxp3 (FJK-16s), T-bet (ebio4B10), CXCL9 (MIG-2F5.5) (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), CXCL10 (CL9177B) (Cedarlane, Burlington, ON), CXCL11 (rmCXCL11) (R&D systems, Burlington, ON), Ki-67 (B56) (BD Bioscience, Mississauga, Ontario) was determined by intracellular staining performed according to manufacturers’ protocols. The STAT1 phosphorylation assay was done following BD recommendations. To evaluate cytokine production, T cells were re-stimulated for 4hrs at 37°C with PMA (20ng/ml), ionomycin (1nM) (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, Canada) and BD GolgiStopTM (1:1000 dilution), and then stained intracellularly with anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2) (eBioscience, San Diego, CA). T-bet fluorescence minus one (FMO) control and antibody titration is displayed in S1E Fig.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against murine CD8a (53–6.7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD44 (IM7), PD-1 (29F.1A12), CTLA-4 (UC10-4B9), Tim-3 (RMT3-23), Lag-3 (C9B7W), CD25 (PC61), CD11c (N418), CD11b (M1/70), XCR1(ZET), CD80 (16-10A1), IL12 (C15.6), CD137L (TKS-1), CD215 (6B4C88), CCR7 (4B12), CXCR3 (CXCR3-173), as well as fluorophore-conjugated Streptavidin, TruStain FcX mouse anti-CD16/32 antibody (93) and reagents for life/dead discrimination 7-AAD and ZombieRed were all purchased from BioLegend. Anti-TNFα (TN3-19.12) and anti-IFNγ (XMG1.2) were purchased from eBiosciences. Anti-IL2 (JES6-5H4) and anti-CD212 (114) were purchased from BD Biosciences. Anti-iNOS2 (sc-7271) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. PE-conjugated, peptide-loaded MHC class I tetramers were produced in-house as already described [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface markers were stained in 1×PBS containing 2% FBS with indicated antibodies. Anti-CD4 (RM4-5), anti-CD8 (53-6.7), anti-CD25 (PC61), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-CD62L (MEL-14), anti-CD45.1 (A20), and anti-CD45.2 (104) were purchased from eBioscience. Intracellular staining was performed using the Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Kit (eBioscience) with indicated antibodies. For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were stimulated for 4 h with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (50 ng/mL; Sigma-Aldrich) and ionomycin (1 μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich), and then treated for another 1 h with Golgi-Plug (BD Biosciences). Anti–IFN-γ (XMG1.2), anti-IL17A (eBio17B7), and anti–IL-4 (eBio 11B11) were purchased from eBioscience, and anti–cleaved caspase-3(Asp175) (D3E9), anti–phospho-H2A.x(Ser139) (20E3), and anti-LC3b (D11) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. All data collection was performed with a FACSAria II cell sorter (BD Biosciences), and data analysis was done with FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

FACS Analysis of Immune Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-mouse antibodies (BioLegend unless otherwise noted) used for FACS analysis were as follows: FITC-conjugated anti-CD3 (17A2) and anti-CD4 (GK1.5; BD Pharmingen); PE-conjugated anti-CD4 (GK1.5), anti-CD19 (6D5), anti-CD69 (H1.2F3; BD Pharmingen), anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2; eBioscience), anti-TNF-α (MP6-XT22; eBioscience), and anti-IL-2 (JES6-5H4; eBioscience); PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-NK-1.1 (PK136) and anti-CD44 (IM7; BD Pharmingen); APC-conjugated anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2), anti-TNF-α (MP6-XT22) and anti-IL-7Rα (A7R34), and BV421-conjugated anti-CD62L (MEL-14).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Naive CD4+ T Cell Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Naive CD4+ T (CD44lowCD62LhighCD25) cells were purified using a CD4+ naive T cell negative isolation kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (STEMCELL Technologies). The in vitro differentiation experiments were performed as previously described. Naive CD4+ T cells were stimulated with immobilized anti-CD3 (5 μg/ml; 145-2C11; eBioscience) and anti-CD28 (5 μg/ml; 37.51; eBioscience) for 2 days. Then, the cells were washed and transferred to a new plate and further expanded in medium with hIL-2 (50 U/ml, R&D Systems) for 2 days. For Tfh-like cell differentiation, naive CD4+ T cells were activated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 as above and treated with 20 ng/ml IL-6 (R&D Systems), 20 ng/ml IL-21 (R&D Systems), 10 μg/ml anti-IL-4 (11B11, eBioscience), 10 μg/ml anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2, eBioscience), and 20 μg/ml anti-TGF-β (1D11, R&D Systems) for 4 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating T helper cell responses in CIA mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Draining lymph nodes (DLN) were isolated from vehicle-only and SR2211 treated CIA mice. Isolated DLN cells (5 × 105 per ml) were cultured for 24h in D-MEM supplemented with PSG (penicillin 100 μg/mL, streptomycin sulfate 100μg/mL and glutamine 2mM) and 10% FBS. IFNγ and IL17 production were measured in order to assess TH1 and TH17 cell activity, respectively. The production of IFNγ and IL17 in the DLN was monitored following stimulation with anti-CD3 (1.5μg/mL) and anti-CD28 (2μg/mL) monoclonal antibodies [49 (link)]. After 24h of ex vivo culture, cells were harvested and stained with anti-CD4, and intracellular staining was conducted using anti-IFNγ (XMG1.2,eBioscience) and anti-IL17 (eBio17B7, eBioscience). Flow cytometric analysis was performed on a BD LSRII (BD Biosciences) instrument and analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multiparametric T Cell Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse T cells were labeled for 20min at 4°C with anti-CD3 (17A2), anti-CD4 (GK1.5), anti-CD8 (53–6.7), anti-CD45.1 (A20), anti-CD45.2 (104), anti-Vβ5.1–5.2 (MR9–4), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-CD62L (MEL-14), anti-CD127 (A7R34), KLRG1 (MAFA), anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2) and anti-TNF-α (MP6-XT22) (all eBioscience). Human T cells were labeled with anti-CD3 (UCHT1, Beckman Coulter), anti-CD4 (SK3, BD Biosciences), anti-CD8 (SK1, BD Biosciences). Dead cells were excluded with 1ng/ml TO-PRO-3 iodide (Sigma-Aldrich), or Near-IR (L10119, Life Technology). Intracellular cytokine staining was performed with the cytofix/cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences). Flow cytometry analysis was performed on LSR-II and LSR Fortessa (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star, version 7.6.5 and version 10). Representative flow cytometry gating strategies are found in Fig S9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!