The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Image analysis software

Manufactured by Techcomp Instruments

The Image Analysis Software from Techcomp Instruments is a comprehensive solution for digital image processing and analysis. It provides a suite of tools for image capture, enhancement, measurement, and quantification. The software supports a wide range of image file formats and is designed to work seamlessly with various scientific and industrial imaging devices.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using image analysis software

1

Quantitative Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular protein was extracted using Laemmli’s buffer [35 (link)] and the protein levels of KLF4, p21CIP, SP1, MYC and CCND1 was determined through western blotting using appropriate antibodies as described previously [36 (link)]. β-actin antibody was used as an internal control. Scion Image Analysis software was used for densitometry analysis and the results were expressed as intensity ratio of target protein to β-actin protein taken as arbitrary unit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fractionation and Analysis of Soluble and Insoluble Huntingtin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole mouse striatum tissue was processed for soluble/insoluble fractionation as previously described (Ochaba et al., 2016 (link)). Protein concentration was determined by BCA assay (Pierce, Rockford), and 30g of protein was reduced, loaded on 3–8% bis-acrylamide gels/4%–12% bis-tris mini gels (Life Technologies) for SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, and nonspecific proteins were blocked with SuperBlock Blocking Buffer (Thermo Scientific). Primary antibodies used were: Anti-Huntingtin (Millipore Cat# MAB5492 RRID:AB_347723), Anti-RanGAP1 (Santa Cruz Cat# sc-25630) and anti-α-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# T6074 RRID:AB_477582). Blots were developed using Pico/Dura Western Blotting Detection System (Pierce) and exposed to film for images. Protein quantification was performed using Scion Image analysis software. Band densities were normalized to α-tubulin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Airway Mucus Volume in Lung Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of histological sections were captured using an Axioskop 40 microscope, camera, and Axiovision software. Black and white images were taken with a 10 × objective lens and analyzed with Scion image analysis software. The mucus-containing area and the perimeter of basal lamina from large airways, visually judged to be third generation bronchus, were used for analysis. The volume of mucus per airway was calculated as described previously (Harkema et al., 1987 (link)).
VS values (nl/mm2 basal lamina) were calculated for each lung section and averaged for vehicle control and RSV infected groups. VS calculations were averaged for each treatment group and are reported as the mean ± SEM for each strain (n = 3/infection/strain).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of AsPHYA Mutants in Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Full-length AsPHYA mutant (K411L, T418D and D422R) genes were cloned into pBI121, and each construct was introduced into phyA-deficient Arabidopsis (phyA-201). After obtaining the homozygous lines, western blot analysis was carried out with crude extracts from 5-day-old dark-grown seedlings to assess the expression of AsphyA proteins using AsphyA-specific monoclonal antibody (oat22). For loading controls in this analysis, we used 1:10,000 polyclonal antibody against Arabidopsis translationally controlled tumour protein (AtTCTP; At3g16640) (ref. 48 (link)). For the photoresponse analyses of seedlings, seeds were sown on half strength MS medium and cold treated for 5 days in the dark. Hypocotyl lengths and cotyledon areas were then measured with 5- or 4-day-grown transgenic seedlings under continuous far-red light (cFR) with various fluence rates or at 10 μmol m−2 s−1, respectively. In addition, for the analysis of a FR-VLFR, seeds were exposed to red light (20 μmol m−2 s−1) for 1 h and transferred to dark condition at 21 °C for 1 day. Then, the seedlings were grown with hourly 5 min pulse of far-red light (0.5 μmol m−2 s−1) or in the dark for 3 days. The hypocotyls and cotyledons were photographed with a digital camera (Nikon), and then measured with Scion Image analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Determining Apparent Particle Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Apparent particle density was determined by the projective image count method as follows. The weighed amount of the agglomerates was placed on a glass plate and number of particles and their Hey-wood diameters were determined using the Scion image analysis software. Subsequently, the apparent particle density was calculated according to Eq (1 (link)).
where W=weight of particles, V=volume of particles, d=Heywood diameter, and n=number of particles (11 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Agglomerate Particle Size

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Light microscopy pictures of the agglomerates (at least 60 particles) were captured by a digital camera and subsequently analyzed by the Scion image analysis software. The average particle size of a single particle was defined as the average length of the distance measured at two degree intervals joining two outline points passing through the center of gravity of the particle.
The shape of the particles was characterized by the ratio between the height and the width of a box bounding the particle, where the height of the box was parallel to the largest diameter passing through the center. This parameter will be referred to as the aspect ratio (AR) in the rest of the paper (10 (link)).
To determine the primary crystal size of the agglomerates, they were disintegrated in an aqueous solution of tween 80 (0.05%) using ultrasonicator (Starsonic 18-35, liarre Casal Flumanese, Italy) for 30s at 100 W. Then, a small amount of obtained primary crystals (about 20 mg) was suspended in mineral oil (Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis, USA) and the suspension was spread onto a microscope slide. In order to settle this mixture consistently on the slide, a cover slip was used and then crystal size was measured as explained previously.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In vivo Chicken Embryo CAM Angiogenesis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vivo chicken embryo CAM angiogenesis model was used as previously described. Leghorn fertilized eggs were incubated for 7 days at 37°C in the incubator, at which point a window was opened on the egg's shell to expose the CAM. The window was covered with tape, and the eggs were returned to the incubator. Different amounts of DYB‐03 (5, 10, and 20 µM) in a solution containing RPMI 1640 medium were applied to an area of 1 cm2 (restricted by a plastic ring) of the CAM on day 9 of embryo development. 48 h after treatment and subsequent incubation at 37°C, CAMs were fixed in situ, excised from the eggs, placed on slides, and left to air dry. Pictures were taken through a stereoscope equipped with a digital camera, and the total length of the vessels was measured using image analysis software (software; Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD). Assays for each test sample were conducted three times, with each experiment including 6 to 10 eggs per data point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Carbonylation Evaluation in Myoblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein carbonylation was evaluated both in C2C12 myoblasts and C2C12 differentiated myotubes. After extraction, 20 μg samples of protein were denatured in 6% sodium dodecyl sulfate (Merck, Milan, Italy) and derivatized with 10 mM 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine (DNPH) (Merck, Milan, Italy) for 15 min at room temperature. Samples were separated on a 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel by electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy). Membranes were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Merck, Milan, Italy) in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (PBST) and then probed overnight with specific primary antibody versus DNPH (1:5000 in PBST/1% BSA). After being washed with PBST, the membranes were incubated for 1 h in PBST containing the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit (1:5000; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) and again washed. Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) was used to visualize the peroxidase-coated bands. Densitometric analysis was performed using the Scion Image analysis software. Regarding each experiment, the density of all bands shown in a lane was reported as the mean. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) normalization was performed [42 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Intracellular ROS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Generation of intracellular ROS was measured with the fluoroprobe DCF-DA. Briefly, MMCs were incubated for 60 min at 37 °C with 10 μM DCF-DA in absence or presence of PFSE in a dose-dependently. Fluorescence intensity was measured by fluorescence microscopy (NIKON; excitation 488 nm, emission 513 nm). Average intensity for each experimental group of cells was determined using Scion Image Analysis software, and values were expressed as the above control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!