The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using α 32p utp

1

Generation and Characterization of sinI and RcsR1 Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR products of sinI and RcsR1 were generated using primers sinivfwd/rev and RcsR1ivfwd/rev, respectively (Table S5), resulting in a 198 bp sequence of sinI containing the 5' UTR and full-length RcsR1. In case of wild type sinI and RcsR1, chromosomal DNA was used as template. For mutated versions of sinI and RcsR1, the respective PCR products were subcloned to pDrive and inverse PCR was carried out using primers sinImutGTGfwd/rev and RcsR1mutCAC fwd/rev (Table S5), resulting in a 3 base mutation in sinI 5'-UTR from position 11 to 13 and in the second stem-loop of RcsR1 from position 69 to 71. Mutated sequences were subcloned to pDrive and used as templates for PCR as described above. PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit from Qiagen. 500 ng of each PCR product was used for in vitro transcription with the MEGAshortscript T7 kit (Ambion). The reactions were performed as instructed by the manufacturer. For monophosphorylated RcsR1, 5-fold excess of GMP over GTP was used in the reaction instead.36 (link) [α-32P]-UTP (Hartmann Analytic; FP-210) was used to label sinI transcripts internally.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Radiolabeled 15S rRNA Transcription

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequence of full-length mature 15S rRNA was amplified from yeast genomic DNA using primers 15S_F and 15S_R (all primer sequences are provided in the Supplemental Table S1), and Phusion DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher), and cloned into pTZ19R (Thermo Fisher). The pTZ19::15S vector was linearized with SmaI (Thermo Fisher) and transcribed using the T7 transcription kit (Thermo Fisher), according to the manufacturer's instructions, with α-32P-UTP (Hartmann Analytic) added to the reaction to produce radiolabeled substrate, followed by digestion with RNase-free DNase I (Roche). Templates for shorter RNAs were generated by annealing appropriate complementary synthetic DNA oligonucleotides (all sequences are provided in the Supplemental Table S1), containing the T7 promoter sequence, and transcribed in vitro as described above. The RNA transcripts were then purified by electrophoresis in denaturing acrylamide gels (5%–12%, depending on the transcript length) and isolation of the appropriate bands as described previously (Malecki et al. 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vitro Transcription Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transcription from promoter DNA fragments was performed essentially as described previously (12 (link), 19 (link)). Reactions were performed in 10 μl of transcription buffer TB (20 mM Tris HCl [pH 7.9], 40 mM KCl, and 10 mM MgCl2) containing 1 pmol of coli RNAP core with 3 pmols of σ70 and 10% DMSO with or without inhibitors. Transcription was initiated by the addition of a mixture of 25 μM CpA dinucleotide as a primer, 0.2 μl α-[32P] UTP (10 mCi/ml; Hartmann Analytic), 10 μM UTP, 100 μM ATP, 100 μM CTP, and 100 μM GTP, and 10 nM promoter DNA. Reactions were stopped after 10-min incubation at 37°C by the addition of equal volume of formamide-containing loading buffer. Products were resolved in denaturing polyacrylamide gels, revealed by phosphorimaging (Cytiva), and analyzed using ImageQuant software (Cytiva).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In Vitro Transcription Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

In vitro transcription was performed with the use of T7 Transcription Kit (ThermoScientific) according to manufacturer's instructions with the addition of [α-32P] UTP (Hartmann Analytic). As a template for in vitro transcription, PCR products containing SP6 or T7 promoter sequence (one on each end) were used. Primers used in the study are listed in Supplementary Table S3. DNA template was removed by DNase I digestion and obtained radiolabeled transcripts were purified on the spin columns with the use of Sephadex G-50 gel filtration medium (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mitochondrial Transcription Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mitochondria were isolated from fresh heart and liver tissue by differential centrifugation (1 × 1,000g, 1 × 10,000g). For in organello transcription experiments, freshly purified mitochondria (500 μg) were washed three times in incubation buffer (25 mM sucrose, 75 mM sorbitol, 10 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM K2HPO4, 100 mM KCl, 0.05 mM EDTA, 1 mM ADP, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glutamate, 2.5 mM malate, and 1 mg/ml BSA, pH 7.4). Washed mitochondria were resuspended in 500 μl of incubation buffer and supplemented with 50 μCi of α-32P-UTP (Hartmann Analytic). Samples were incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Afterwards, mitochondria were pelleted, resuspended in incubation buffer containing 0.2 mM UTP and incubated for 10 min at 37°C. Mitochondria were subsequently washed twice in cold wash buffer (10% glycerol, 0.15 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 6.8). An aliquot of the mitochondria (10 μl) was taken as a loading control. Then, RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Ambion) following the manufacturer’s recommendations and precipitated overnight at −20°C. The purified RNA was loaded onto a formaldehyde–agarose gel and blotted as a northern blot. The membrane (Hybond-N+; GE Healthcare) was exposed to a phosphorimager screen. Loading controls were run on 10% NuPage gels using MOPS buffer and equal loading was assessed by immunoblotting against HSP60.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In Vitro Transcription Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transcription from promoter DNA fragments was performed essentially as described (20 (link)). Briefly, reactions were performed in 10 μl of transcription buffer TB (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.9, 40 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2). 1 pmol of E. coli RNAP core with 3 pmol of σ70 or 1 pmol of T. aquaticus RNAP core with 3 pmol of T. aquaticus σA or 1 pmol of S. aureus RNAP core with 3 pmol of S. aureus σA or 1 pmol of M. smegmatis or S. epidermidis RNAP holoenzymes were incubated in TB with 1 μl of DMSO containing or not containing Urd at 37°C (or 60°C in case of T. aquaticus RNAP) for 5 min. Transcription was initiated by the addition of 2 μl mixture of nucleotides and promoter DNA in TB, containing (final concentrations): 10 nM promoter DNA, 25 μM CpA (for T7A1 and GalP1 promoters) or 100 μM ApA (for lacUV promoter), 0.2 μl α-[32P]UTP (10mCi/ml) (Hartmann Analytic), 10 μM UTP with (run off transcription) or without (abortive transcription) 100 μM ATP, CTP and GTP. Reactions were stopped after 10 min incubation at 37°C (or 60°C in case of T. aquaticus RNAP) for run off transcription or 5 min for abortive transcription by the addition of equal volume of formamide-containing loading buffer. Products were resolved in denaturing polyacrylamide gels, revealed by PhosphorImaging (GE Healthcare), and analyzed using ImageQuant software (GE Healthcare)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!