The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nexus copy number software

Manufactured by BioDiscovery
Sourced in United States

Nexus Copy Number software is a bioinformatics tool for analyzing copy number variations from next-generation sequencing data. It provides core functions for processing, visualizing, and interpreting copy number data without extrapolation on intended use.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using nexus copy number software

1

Identifying Recessive Skin Disorder Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood or saliva samples with standard methods. Homozygosity mapping was performed in samples of index patients using HumanCytoSNP‐12 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. Generated data were analyzed with Nexus Copy Number™ software (BioDiscovery, Hawthorne CA, USA). The longest regions of homozygosity were extracted for each index case and compared to the locations of known ARCI genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

High-Resolution DNA Copy Number Variation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High resolution DNA copy number variation (CNV) analysis was performed on all patients at the time of diagnosis using the Affymetrix platform, ie the GeneChip® Human Mapping Affymetrix 250K (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA) from 2007 to 2010, the Genome wide Human SNP 6.0 during 2010 and the CytoscanHD® array from 2011. These three platforms contain 500 000, 906 600 and 750 000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), respectively. The raw CEL files were analyzed for DNA CNV using Nexus Copy Number software (BioDiscovery, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SNP-CGH Array Analysis of Copy Number

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the SNP-CGH array experiment, Illumina HumanCytoSNP-12v2.1 BeadChip was used. Data generated were then analyzed by using the ASCAT method described by Van Loo et al. [42 (link)]. We compared and schematically represented the copy number status and clustering of the patients in our cohort using Nexus copynumber software (BioDiscovery, Inc, El Segundo, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optimal Microdeletion Detection Threshold

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw CMA data were processed using Nexus Copy Number Software (Biodiscovery Inc., El Segundo, CA, USA) to identify any deletion that was covered by at least three consecutive probes. The sequences were aligned to the GRCh37/hg19 reference genome. To determine the minimum number of probes necessary to detect a microdeletion reliably, we compared the CMAs from two pairs of monozygotic twins and two singletons whose tests were inadvertently performed twice. There were, in essence, four replicate pairs of CMAs. Each twin pair was tested concurrently using either the SNP6.0 or Cytoscan HD platform. Each singleton had two blood samples obtained 3–4 weeks apart, and the replicate test was performed using the same SNP6.0 or Cytoscan HD platform. The fraction of reproducibly detected microdeletions was calculated as a function of probe number. A microdeletion was included for subsequent analysis based on a 20-probe size threshold, as explained in the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Locus-Specific Loss of Heterozygosity Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Locus-specific loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses were performed using DNA extracted from tumour material and adjacent normal tissue. The respective DNA fractions were used to perform PCRs generating small amplicons covering the patient-specific mutations, which were sequenced by Sanger sequencing (primers and conditions available upon request). Genome-wide SNP array analysis of tumour DNA was performed using the OncoScan FFPE Express service (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The SNP array data were analysed using the Nexus Copy Number software package (Biodiscovery, Hawthorne, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genotyping UM Cell Line DNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UM cell line DNAs were genotyped with the illumina Human Omni1-Quad V1.0 beadchip (Illumina, San Diego) according to the manufacture’s instructions. The beadchips were processed and imaged on an illumine Bead Array Reader. Bead intensity data obtained for each sample were loaded into Nexus Copy Number software from BioDiscovery (EI Segundo, CA) for gene copy number analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Gal-4 Expression by aCGH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to evaluate whether different expression levels of Gal-4 were determined by copy number variation of this gene, genomic DNAs were extracted from PDAC-1 and PDAC-2 cells using Ambion®-RecoverAll kit (Life Technologies). The quantity and purity of extracted DNAs were determined as described above. DNAs were subjected to aCGH, using Agilent 4×180K platform (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA), as described previously [21 (link)]. The slides were scanned on Agilent Microarray Scanner, followed by data extraction and normalization by Feature Extraction v10.5 software (Agilent). Nexus Copy Number™ software was used to analyze the DNA copy number variations (BioDiscovery, Hawthorne, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Chromosome 3p Copy Number Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of the chromosome 3p locus was based on the published and de-identified MSKCC prostate cancer data with 181 primary and 37 metastatic tumors [13 (link)] and visualized using the Nexus Copy Number software (v. 7 from BioDiscovery). All analyses for this publication were performed on de-identified patient data and material and thus qualified for exemption from human subjects statements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SNP Genotyping and Copy Number Profiling of PDX Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Infinium Global Screening Array-24 v1.0 BeadChip from Illumina containing ~ 700.000 SNPs to determine copy number variation was used for genome-wide SNP genotyping of the different generations PDX tumours of TC1, TC4 and TC5. DNA processing, tagging and hybridization to the CHIP were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Illumina). Primary assessment and SNP call rate quality control of SNP intensity output files were performed using GenomeStudio software (Illumina). Samples passed the inclusion quality control criteria, including call rates > 95%. Further analysis was performed with Nexus Copy number software (BioDiscovery, El Segundo, CA, USA) to generate copy number alteration (CNA) profiles. Quantitative CNA correlative analysis of the different PDX passages were performed as described previously12 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microarray-based Genomic Profiling Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microarray-based genomic profiling was carried out in a blinded fashion using two different platforms; the CytoSan HD array platform (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the HumanOmniExpress12v1.0 array platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Hybridizations were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The data obtained by the CytoScan HD array platform were analyzed using the Chromosome Analysis Suite software package (Affymetrix), and for the HumanOmniExpress12v1.0 platform data were analyzed using Nexus copy number software (Biodiscovery Inc., Hawthorne, CA, USA) using annotations of genome version GRCh37 (hg19).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!