The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Poroshell ec c18 column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Poroshell EC-C18 column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of organic compounds. It features a core-shell particle technology that combines the efficiency of a porous particle with the speed of a solid-core particle. The column is suitable for a variety of HPLC applications, providing reliable and reproducible results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using poroshell ec c18 column

1

HPLC-HRMS Quantification of Atmospheric Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC-HRMS was used to quantify p-NP, pinonic acid, THB, and DHDN in bulk aqueous photochemical experiments, representative chromatograms shown in SI Appendix, Figs. S12 and S13. Analyses were performed on an Agilent 1100 HPLC coupled to a linear-trap-quadrupole (LTQ-XL) Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Corp., Waltham MA) operating at a mass resolving power of 60,000 m/Δm at m/z 400. Separation of DHDN and polyols was performed isocratically on a Shodex Asahipak NH2P-40 2D column (2 × 150 mm, 4 μm, 100 Å) at flow rate of 0.3 mL/min, column temperature of 40°C, and eluent mixture 90:10 MeCN and water with 0.05% ammonium formate. Analysis of p-NP and organosulfate products was performed with an Agilent Poroshell EC-C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 2.7 μm, 120 Å) at flow rate of 0.27 mL/min, column temperature of 30°C, and eluent mixture 40:60 MeCN and water with 0.1% ammonium formate. For solutions containing ammonium sulfate, a 100 μL aliquot of reaction sample was mixed with 900 μL MeOH. This precipitated out the ammonium sulfate, which was filtered off, and the filtrate was analyzed without further purification. For solutions in pure water, a 100 μL aliquot of reaction sample was diluted with 900 μL MeOH and used without further purification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of Cannabinoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Agilent 1200 HPLC apparatus coupled with an Agilent 6460 Jet Stream triple quadrupole (QQQ) mass spectrometer was used in this study. Using a chromatographic Agilent Poroshell EC-C18 column with 2.7 μm particles and dimensions of 100 × 2.1 mm ID after an Agilent Poroshell EC-C18 precolumn with 4.6 μm particles, separation of cannabinoids was achieved with a mobile phase of water containing 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid (B). The initial conditions were 34% of B held for 8 min; then, B was increased to 95% over 4 min and maintained for 1 min; then, B was reduced to 34% over 1 min and maintained for 6 min with an additional 3 min post-run. The flow rate was 0.2 mL/min, and the column temperature was maintained at 35 °C. Detection was performed in negative ion mode, and analytes were ionised by electrospray and monitored in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Optimised mass spectrometer parameters were: gas temperature 300 °C, gas flow 5 L/min, nebuliser voltage 35 V, sheath gas temperature 250 °C at flow 11 L/min, and capillary and nozzle voltage 4000 V and 500 V, respectively. The MRM transition ions are shown in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Analysis of Lignin-Derived Aromatics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentrations of lignin-derived aromatics and gallate were analyzed by an HPLC system (Shimadzu, LC-20A). Before analysis, all samples were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant was separated with a reversed-phase Poroshell EC-C18 column (4 μm, 4.6 mm by 150 mm; Agilent Technologies). A two-phase mobile phase system was used: Solvent A was water with 0.1% formic acid, and solvent B was acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. The gradient of the mobile phase was set as follows: 8 to 26% solvent B for 5 min, 26 to 8% solvent B for 3 min, and 8% solvent B for an additional 2 min. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 1.5 ml/min, and the column temperature was maintained at 60°C. Target compounds were quantified on the basis of the peak areas at an ultraviolet (UV) absorbance of 280 nm. The HPLC system equipped with a Bio-Rad Aminex HPX-87H column and a diode array detector was used for glucose analysis. The mobile phase of the HPLC system was 0.005 M sulfuric acid with a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Lipid Profiling by HPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total
bacterial lipids were extracted into chloroform and methanol
for analysis by HPLC-MS. The lipid samples were prepared at 1 mg mL–1 in the starting mobile phase (50% A and 50% B), and
10 μL was injected into a reversed-phase HPLC system (Agilent
1260 series) using an Agilent Poroshell EC-C18 column (1.9 μm,
3 × 50 mm) coupled with an Agilent guard column (2.7 μm,
3 × 5 mm) and analyzed by an Agilent 6546 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF
mass spectrometer. The mobile phases were A [2 mM ammonium formate
in 90/10 methanol/water (v/v) and B (3 mM ammonium formate in 85/15/0.1
1-propanol/cyclohexane/water (v/v/v)]. The gradients were: 0–2
min, 50% A; 2–10 min, from 50% A to 100% B; 10–15 min,
100% B; 15–17 min, from 100% B to 50% A; and 17–20 min,
50% A. CID-MS was carried-out with a collision energy of 35 V, and
the isolation width was set to 1.3 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis and Characterization of Resolvin E4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following
a literature procedure,36 (link) a solution of
RvE4 methyl ester (2, 5.0 μg, 14 nmol) in MeOH
was concentrated under a gentle stream of nitrogen gas, dissolved
in THF (500 μL), and cooled to −78 °C. To the resulting
solution was added 1 M LiOH (50 μL, 50 μmol) and distilled
water (one drop, ∼20 μL) and the reaction mixture was
stirred in a 4 °C cold room for 24 h. The reaction mixture was
then concentrated under a gentle stream of nitrogen gas and reconstituted
with MeOH (500 μL). The identity of the compound was verified
by UV–Vis and LC–MS/MS. The chemical yield of the RvE4
free acid 1 was 69% (3.3 μg, 9.9 nmol) post saponification
(based on UV–Vis) and was determined to be >95% pure by
targeted
MRM LC–MS/MS. The physical properties of synthetic RvE4 (1) and biogenic RvE4 (1) were analyzed on a QTRAP
5500 mass spectrometer (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) equipped with
a LC20AD UFLC (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) with a Poroshell EC-C18 column
(100 mm × 4.6 mm × 2.7 μm; Agilent Technologies, Santa
Clara, CA, USA) kept at 50 °C. RvE4 (1) was monitored
by targeted multiple reaction monitoring (m/z 333 > 115) and enhanced product ion mode in negative
polarity.
RvE4 (1) was eluted at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min with
a gradient of LC–MS grade methanol/water/acetic acid from 50/50/0.01
v/v/v to 98/2/0.01 v/v/v. Data were acquired and analyzed with Analyst
version 1.6.2 (Sciex).8 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Kudzu Flower and Mandarin Peel Supplement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mandarin peel and kudzu flower are listed as Old Dietary Ingredients marketed in the US before 15 October 1994 [19 ]. Therefore, they might be used legally in a dietary supplement without submitting the Food and Drug Administration notification. The test and placebo products were provided by the LG Household & Health Care (Seoul, Korea). In brief, the 70% ethanolic extract of kudzu flower and aqueous extract of mandarin peel were spray-dried separately and mixed at the ratio of 6.5:5. The KM, lactose, crystalline cellulose, sodium carboxymethyl starch, silicon dioxide, magnesium stearate, and cacao color were packed in a capsule to provide a dose of 383.4 mg KM. For the placebo capsule, KM was replaced with an equal weight of lactose. The test product was standardized to contain 70.3 mg/g of three tectorigenin derivatives from the kudzu flower and 51.7 mg/g hesperidin from mandarin peel using a high-performance liquid chromatograph equipped with a variable wavelength detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Poroshell EC-C18 column (2.1 mm × 1000 mm, 2.7 μm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

LC-ESI/TOF-MS Analysis of EtOAc Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EtOAcPart was also analysed by LC–ESI/TOF-MS with a 1200 Series LC-chromatograph (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) coupled with a MicrOTOF II time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA). 5 µL injection was performed with an autosampler on a Poroshell EC-C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm; 2.7 µm, Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The source temperature was set at 200 °C, the drying gas (nitrogen) flow rate was 10.0 L/min and the nebulizer gas (nitrogen) pressure was 4 bar. Data were acquired in negative mode in the range of m/z 100–1500. The capillary voltage was 3.8 kV, the capillary exit voltage was −150 V, the skimmer 1 and 2 voltages were 50 V and 23 V, respectively, the hexapole 1 voltage was set to −23 V, the hexapole RF voltage was 120 Vpp, lens 1 transfer was 68 μs and lens 1 pre plus stage was 7 μs. Mass calibration was achieved by infusing ammonium formate in an isopropanol–water mixture (1:1, v/v) as an external standard. All data were analysed using Bruker Daltonics ESI Compass Data Analysis Version 4.0 SP 1 (Bruker Daltonics Inc., Billerica, MA, USA). The mobile phase consisted of spectroscopic grade methanol (B) and ultrapure water (A) containing 0.05% (v/v) formic acid. The linear gradient elution was set from 10% to 100% of B in 90 min at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cannabinoid Quantification by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cannabinoid content was determined by LC-MS/MS, as previously described [65 (link)]. Analyses were performed on Agilent 1200 HPLC in tandem with mass spectrometry Agilent 6460 JetStream triple quad detector. Agilent Poroshell EC-C18 column with a particle size of 2.7 µm and dimensions of 100 × 2.1 mm ID was used. The mobile phase consisted of ultra-pure water with the addition of 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (B) using the gradient method with a flow of 0.3 mL/min. The gradient method was composed of multiple linear gradients as follows: 0 min, 34% B; 8 min, 34% B; 12 min, 95% B; 13 min, 95% B; 14 min, 95% B; 20 min, 34% B; and 3 min post time. Detailed parameters for LC-MS/MS method are shown in Table 6.
The column temperature was stable at 35 °C. Negative ionisation was used on the mass spectrometer, the temperature of the carrier gas was 300 °C, and that of the supporting gas was 250 °C. The total gas flow was 16 L/min.
The calibration curve for each cannabinoid was plotted in the concentration range of 2.5–200.0 ng/mL with good linearity in the measurement range between calibration points, R2 > 0.999. All points were measured in triplicates with an RSD < 3%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Analysis of HQR-Containing Serum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male SD rats were intragastrically treated with normal saline (control) or HQR (9.0 g/kg/d) once daily for 7 days. Two hours after the last administration, blood was collected from the aorta ventralis, stored at 4°C for 1 h and centrifuged at 2000 rpm/min for 30 min. Serum samples from the same group were pooled, inactivated in a 56°C water bath for 30 min and sterilized by filtration. The HQR‐containing serum was stored at −80°C for subsequent vitro experiments.
The Agilent 1290UHPLC Liquid Chromatography System and Agilent MassHunter Workstation Data Acquisition Software (version B.06.00) were used for component analysis of HQR ‐containing serum. The chromatography conditions were as follows: Agilent Poroshell EC‐C18 column (internal diameter, 100 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm), sample size of 5 μl, temperature of 20°C, velocity flow of 0.3 ml/min, mobile phase A containing 0.1% formic acid in methanol, mobile phase B containing 0.1% formic acid in an aqueous buffer, 0–1 min mobile phase A 5%, 1–10 min mobile phase A 5–80%, 10–13 min mobile phase A 80% and stop time of 13 min. The mass spectrometry conditions were as follows: multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) and negative ion scanning mode. The internal standard was mangostin and epinastine, with an accurate weight of 1 mg standard and 5 ml of methanol diluted 500 times. Plasma samples were prepared by the methanol precipitation method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Hair Analysis by HPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis was performed on an Agilent-1200 series HPLC system coupled to an Agilent G6130A single quadrupole MS instrument (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The separation of the extracted compounds was carried out on an Agilent Poroshell EC-C18 column (2.1 mm × 100.0 mm, 1.9 µm) at 40 °C. The mobile phase was methanol (solvent A) and 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution (solvent B), respectively. Gradient elution was performed at 0.3 mL/min with a total run time of 15.0 min: 20% B held for 1 min, 1–4 min, 20%B→5%B and held for 4 min; 8–8.1 min, 5%B→20%B; and finally held for 6.9 min.
The electrospray ionization (ESI) was set at positive ion mode. Source conditions were set as follows: drying gas (N2) flow 10 L/min; drying gas temperature 350 °C; capillary voltage 3.0 kV. The instrument was operated in the scan mode in the range from 50–750 (m/z) for qualitative analysis and selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode for quantitative analysis with the parameters described in Table 1.
High-efficiency hair grinder (JXFSTPRP-CL; Jingxin, Shanghai, China) was used for hair samples preparation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!