The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Labram raman spectrometer

Manufactured by Horiba
Sourced in France, United States

The LabRAM Raman spectrometer is a high-performance laboratory instrument used for molecular analysis. It provides precise, non-destructive measurements of the vibrational states of molecules through the Raman effect. The LabRAM spectrometer is capable of collecting and analyzing Raman spectra, which can be used to identify and characterize a wide range of materials and substances.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using labram raman spectrometer

1

Characterization of FNDSP Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to characterize the iron and nitrogen species of the synthesized FNDSP catalysts by using an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Thermo ESCALAB 250Xi) with Al Kα as the radiation source. The degree of carbon defects was investigated by Raman spectra and measured on a Horiba Jobin Yvon (HJY) Lab RAM Raman spectrometer. For structure characterization, X-ray diffraction (XRD) tests were carried out on an X-ray diffractometer (Brucker D8 Advance) with Cu Kα radiation. The composition and morphology of the FNDSP cathode materials were analyzed by using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Hitachi S-4800). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and elemental mapping investigations were performed with a FEI Tecnai G2 F20 microscope operated at 200 kV. To acquire the cathode after the cycling process, the cell was dissembled in a glove box (MBraun MB 200B) filled with argon, and the cathode was soaked in pure DME for 3–5 minutes to remove residual salts of the electrolyte. After being washed 3 times, the cathode was dried in a vacuum oven and then transferred to an airtight container filled with argon for further characterization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Raman Spectroscopy for Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The measurements were carried out using a Horiba LabRam Raman spectrometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon S.A.S., Longjumeau, France). The setup included a laser source (a 632.8 nm wavelength, 0.01 mW of power), a spectrometer (600 lines/mm grating, a 500 nm blaze wavelength), a Mitutoyo Apo Plan 50x VIS lens, and a CCD camera (a 2000 × 800-pixel matrix in the receiving area, a 15 × 15 μm size of the pixel). The design of the spectrometer is shown in Figure 3.
The excitation radiation of the laser source was put through an aperture diaphragm serving as a spatial filter. The edge filter reflecting the excitation light and transmitting the Raman signal directs the excitation beam to the sample fixed at the object stage. The Raman scattering signal was then collected by the lens, passed through the edge filter, and directed to the spectrometer. The spectrally resolved signal was projected onto a CCD camera to obtain a Raman spectrum.
It was experimentally found that the selected laser’s power and wavelength make possible the fluorescence signal reduction and allow for minimizing the probability of destroying the biological structures due to the nanoparticle heating.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Molecular Detection using SERS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A micro-Raman spectrophotometer (Horiba LabRam Raman Spectrometer) was employed to study essential aspects of molecular detection under Nd:YAG laser excitation. The SERS activity has been tested with various kinds of probe molecules like (i) dyes (crystal violet - CV) (ii) explosive molecule (ammonium nitrate - AN) (iii) pesticide molecule (thiram) and (iv) biomolecules, especially DNA bases (adenine, cytosine), which could be a DNA and RNA builder and tracing of these solutions is essential in biomarker investigations along with antibiotics (penicillin-G, kanamycin, and ampicillin) that are effective in preventing and treating infections in humans and animals. For achieving a better consistency in the Raman signal, the measurements were performed using a 50X objective, 10 s acquisition time and using 532 nm excitation. The spot size estimated at the focus was ∼1.5 μm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Graphene-based Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystal structures of the MGF and PACF were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) on a D8 Advance powder X-ray diffractometer using Cu Ka radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm). The surface morphologies of the MGF and PACF were observed by a field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) (FEI Sirion 200). Surface element composition was investigated by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) obtained on SEM. The microstructures of the MGF and PACF were characterized by transmission electron microscope (TEM) (FEI Tecnai G2-20) and selected area electron diffraction (SAED). The Raman spectra were obtained by HORIBA Jobin Yvon LabRAM Raman spectrometer. The thicknesses of the carbon films were measured by SEM. The electrical conductivity of the MGF, PACF, and HCFs were measured by RTS-8 four-probe (Guangzhou Science and Technology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Raman Spectroscopy Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical structure and phase analysis of both samples were conducted by LabRAM Raman spectrometer (Horiba Instruments Inc., United States) HR evolution equipped with 785 nm (100mW) laser diode and backscattering configuration. The gratings were 600 g/mm with CCD detector (cooled at − 60 °C). The spectral resolution was 10 cm−1, 25% laser power, and total acquisition of 5. The Raman spectra in the range of 1100–1800 cm−1 were curve-fitted using Raman software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Material Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of the samples were studied by SEM (JEOL, JSM‐7500F) along with energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy and TEM (JEOL, JSM‐2100) using a TDY‐V5.2 image analysis system. Powder XRD was conducted in the 2θ range of 5°–70° with Cu Kα radiation (PANalytical B.V., X'Pert Pro diffractometer). XPS was performed on a Thermo electron spectrometer (ThermoFisher, Thermo) to investigate the bonding characteristics. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller specific surface areas and pore size distributions were determined using nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms (Micromeritics Instrument, ASAP 2460). FTIR spectroscopy was conducted with a diamond attenuated total reflectance (ATR) attachment (Thermo Fisher, Nicolet Magna 560). Raman spectra were obtained in the back‐scattering mode using an Arion laser (532 nm) on a LabRAM Raman spectrometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon). Solid‐state 31P NMR measurements were collected on an Agilent 600 m with a magnetic field intensity of 14.1 T. The MAS rotating frequency was 10 kHz, and the chemical shift refers to H3PO4. The product yield analysis of the oxidation of alcohols was performed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS; Agilent 7890B, HP‐5 column) and quantitative analyses using gas chromatography (GC; Agilent 8860, HP‐5 column).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Synthesis and Characterization of Porous Amorphous Carbon Nanospheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental setup used in this work to synthesize amorphous carbon nanospheres (Fig. 1) is shown in Figure S1. Argon was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 L/min. The carrier gas was flowed through the reactor for at least 30 min to purge the system prior to the addition of the precursor solution which was prepared by stoichiometrically mixing propiolic acid (95% from sigma-aldrich) with coressponding alkali hydroxides (99.99% from sigma-aldrich). The obtained black powders were washed and centrifuged with deionized water for at least 5 times to remove any salt formed during synthesis. The N2 adsorption-desorption was carried out using Micromeritics ASAP 2020 physisorption analyzer to determine the density of porous carbon nanospehres studied in this work. TEM images were taken with a JEOL 2100 transmission electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. SEM images were taken using a Hitachi S4800 field-emission scanning electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns (PXRD) of the product were obtained with a Japan Rigaku DMax-γA rotation anode X-ray diffractometer equipped with graphite monochromatized Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). Raman spectra were obtained directly from a thin film of carbon samples deposited on Si wafers on a Horiba Jobin-Yvon LabRAM Raman Spectrometer (excited with a 532 nm laser).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!