The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dma 2980 dynamic mechanical analyzer

Manufactured by TA Instruments
Sourced in Japan, United States

The DMA 2980 Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer is a laboratory instrument designed to measure the mechanical properties of materials. It is capable of applying a controlled force or displacement to a sample and recording the resulting deformation or stress. The DMA 2980 can be used to characterize a wide range of materials, including polymers, composites, and rubbers, across a variety of environmental conditions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using dma 2980 dynamic mechanical analyzer

1

NMR, XRD, GPC, and DMA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 1H NMR spectra were recorded using a ECX400 (JEOL, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan), ECA600 (JEOL), and a BioSpin AV-300 spectrometer (Bruker, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan). The powder XRD measurements were performed using a X’Pert Pro MPD diffractometer (PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands) with Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm). GPC measurements were conducted using a system consisting of a LC-20AD pump (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), a CTO-10A column oven, an RID-10A refractive index detector, and two TSK gel Super HZM-N (4.6 × 150 mm; TOSOH, Tokyo, Japan) columns. Chloroform was used as the eluent at a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min at 40 °C. Polystyrene samples were used as standards. The DMA were performed using a DMA 2980 Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (TA Instruments, Tokyo, Japan) at heating rate of 5 °C/min at 1 Hz using a supramolecular polymeric film (5 mm × 20 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Determining Hydrogel Mechanical Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A DMA 2980 Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (TA Instruments, New Castle,
DE) was used to determine Young’s modulus of the hydrogels.
Hydrogel samples in vitro were prepared as described
in Section 2.3, at
20 wt % (corresponding to 1:2, 1:5 molar ratios of maleimide:furan
moieties in the polymers), whereas the same concentration and ratios
of the ex vivo hydrogels were formed in vitreous,
as described in Section 2.7. After extracting the hydrogels from the porcine eye vitreous
body, the gels were cut to allow mechanical tests. All hydrogels (ex vivo and in vitro) were prepared with
approximately 3 mm × 4 mm in height and diameter. The gels were
placed between parallel plates, and a force ramp was applied at a
rate of 0.5 N/min up to a total force of 8 N at room temperature.
The raw data were analyzed using TA Universal Analysis software, and
Young’s modulus (E) was calculated from the
slope of the linear section (from 0 to 22% strain) of the stress–strain
curve. Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD)
(n = 3 for in vitro gel and n = 6 in two porcine eyes for the ex vivo formed gels).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mechanical Stability of PCL/Gelatin Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to analyze the mechanical stability of different ratios of PCL/gelatin composite electrospun scaffolds with and without crater-like structures, uniaxial tensile testing was carried out on scaffolds of each PCL/gelatin ratio. The scaffolds were cut into rectangular sections with dimensions of 2.4 × 0.35 cm2 (scaffold thickness: 210 ± 25 µm) and tested for mechanical loading at a ramp force of 0.1 N/min using a DMA 2980 Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (TA Instruments). At least five samples were tested for each type of scaffold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mechanical Characterization of Dry Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unconfined compression tests were performed on dry scaffolds using a DMA 2980 Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (TA instrument Inc., New Castle, DE). For each group of scaffolds, four cubic specimens, 4 mm in diameter and 4 mm thick, were cut at different locations in the scaffold. All compression tests were performed both perpendicular and parallel to the plane of pore orientation at a uniform stress rate of 0.5 N/min up to a maximum stress of 18 N. The compression modulus was calculated for each compression test from the slope of the linear elastic regime at which the stiffness was reduced by 3% from the maximum stiffness. The uniaxial tensile test was also performed on DMA 2980 (n=4). The samples were cut into strips (15 mm × 5 mm) with a thickness of 0.5 mm. The tensile modulus was calculated from the slope of the stress-strain curve over a strain range of 5-10 %.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Thermal Characterization of Polycaprolactone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
With the aid of dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA), we analyzed thick specimens (15.20 mm × 7.4 mm × 1.10 mm), we used a DMA 2980 dynamic mechanical analyzer (TA Instruments, Inc., New Castle, DE, USA) in the constraint layer-attenuating mode, with a typical average of 2 °C·min−1, for several frequencies mode (1, 5 and 10 Hz) and a displacement of 0.05 mm.
We determined the Tg from the maximum point of the curve between tan (δ) and temperature: tan δ (tan δ = E″/E′) where E″ and E′ are the imaginary and real part of complex tension, respectively, obtained from DMTA data.
We also obtained the experimental data of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at a typical thermal average of 2 °C·min−1. One can observe also from the DMTA trace a small inflexion in the region of 50 °C. This region is believed to correspond to the melting of some crystalline zones of the PCL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!