The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Whole transcript sense target labeling protocol

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Whole-transcript (WT) Sense target Labeling Protocol is a laboratory procedure used for labeling RNA samples in preparation for analysis. The protocol provides a method for generating sense-oriented, amplified, and labeled RNA from total RNA or purified mRNA samples. This allows for the subsequent detection and quantification of gene expression levels using various analysis techniques.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using whole transcript sense target labeling protocol

1

Whole-transcript Gene Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each sample, 300 ng of total RNA were amplified and labeled using the Affymetrix Whole-transcript (WT) Sense target Labeling Protocol without rRNA reduction (www.affymetrix.com). Ten µg of cRNA was carried out into the second cycle for first strand cDNA synthesis reaction. Affymetrix GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST arrays were hybridized with 5.5 µg of labeled sense DNA, washed and stained according to the Affymetrix GeneChip Expression Analysis Manual. Arrays were subsequently scanned on a GCS3000 7G Scanner. Data capture and initial array quality assessment were performed with the Affymetrix GeneChip Command Console v2.0 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptional Profiling of Ameloblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Affymetrix Human Genome 1.0ST Arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) covering 28,869 transcripts in the human genome were employed for transcriptional profiling and performed by Affymetrix. Three to four pre-ameloblast and secretory ameloblast samples collected by LCM were pooled for each array. RNA samples were extracted and purified by RNeasy Mini kits (Qiagen and Rnase-Free DNase Set) as described previously [63 (link)]. A Nanodrop ND 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) was used to determine total RNA concentrations, and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to evaluate RNA quality [64 (link)] Both RNA samples were of acceptable quality (Average RIN of 9.0 and 8.0 for PABs and SABs, respectively), and there was no significant difference between their qualities. For each replicate, 100 ng of total RNA was amplified and labeled using the Affymetrix Whole-Transcript (WT) Sense Target Labeling Protocol without rRNA reduction. Array hybridization, washing, and scanning were performed according to the protocol described in WT Sense Target Labeling Assay Manual.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Palmitate-Induced Transcriptome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 24 h of treatment with 250 μM palmitate or vehicle control, cells were harvested by trypsinization and total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The quality and the concentrations of total RNA were assessed using the Agilent Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Total RNA (100 ng) deemed to be of good quality (RNA integrity number (RIN) greater than 8) was processed according to the standard Affymetrix Whole Transcript Sense Target labeling protocol (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). The fragmented biotin-labeled cDNA from three independent biological replicates was hybridized over 16 h to Affymetrix Gene 1.0 ST arrays and scanned on an Affymetrix Scanner 3000 7G using AGCC software. The resulting CEL files were analyzed for quality using Affymetrix Expression Console software and were imported into GeneSpring GX11.5 (Agilent Technologies) where the data was quantile normalized using PLIER and baseline transformed to the median of the control samples. The probe sets were further filtered to exclude the bottom 20th percentile across all samples as well as probe sets with expression levels with CV > 20 % across all replicates in a condition. The resulting entity list was subjected to a t-test with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction. The data files have been deposited in Array Express, Accession number: E-MTAB-2601.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microarray Analysis of Trauma Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RNA samples were diluted to 100 ng/μl and independently used to perform the target preparation using a whole-transcript sense target labeling protocol (Affymetrix, High Wycombe, UK). Cluster analysis was performed using the unweighted pair group method, with arithmetic means based on Euclidean distance and with hierarchical clustering applied to the normalized data. Fold changes were calculated to identify the different expression profiles of mechanical asphyxia, craniocerebral injury and hemorrhagic shock. We used TreeView software to visualize the cluster analysis results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!