The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using multi reax

1

Determination of Partition Coefficients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before the initiation of the intended experiments, all solvents were mutually saturated at 21°C. 10 nM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) was used for logD determination. For saturation, large stock bottles containing n-octanol and 12% of water/buffer or water/buffer and 12% of n-octanol were shaken for 30 mins on a mechanical shaker and subsequently left to stand on the bench overnight until the phases separated. Approximately 0.50 mg of tested substance was added to the test vessels alongside with 1:1 volume ratio of saturated solvents (250 μL). The test vessels were shaken on the mechanical shaker (Multi Reax, Heidolph Instruments, Schwabach, Germany) for 30 min at the highest speed and then centrifuged for phase separation (16.873 × g for 5 min; Eppendorf 5418 Microcentrifuge, Prague, Czech Republic). Both organic and aqueous phases were sampled for LC-MS analysis. UHPLC-DAD-MS (UHPLC Infinity II 1290, detection by DAD and QqQ 6470; Agilent Technologies, CA, USA; separation on Arion C18 polar column 100 × 2.1 mm, 2.1 μm; Chromservis, Czech Republic) was used for determination of the exact concentration of tested substances. The total quantity of substance (in both phases) was used for logP/logD values calculation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ceramide Quantification by Lipid Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ceramide measurement was performed according to Gu et al. [30 (link)]. In brief, 50μl of each samples was mixed with 500μl CH3OH/H2O/12M HCl (95/5/0.5; v/v/v) and sonificated for 1’ at 4°C. Mixture was shaken for 10’ at RT at maximum speed (Multireax, Heidolph Instruments, Schwabach, Germany). After adding 300μl H2O and 500μl CHCl3 samples were shaken for another 10’ at RT. Samples were centrifuges at 5000rpm for 10’ and the lower phase was transferred to a new tube. 700μl CHCl3 was added to the remaining two phases and mixture was shaken for 10’ at RT at maximum speed. After another centrifugation step as described above, the two lipid containing phases were combined and dried in a vacuum concentrator. Finally, lipids were dissolved in 300μl CHCl3/CH3OH (95/5; v/v) and transferred into a 96-deep well plate (Nunc, Langenselbold, Germany). Prior to injection the samples were diluted with 600μl 5mM ammonium acetate dissolved in CH3OH and shaken at 300rpm (IKA, Staufen, Germany) for 10’. The running solvent for ceramide analyses was composed of CH3OH/ H2O (97/3; v/v).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Anthocyanin, Polyphenol, and Antioxidant Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The same extraction procedure was carried out to analyse the content of anthocyanin, polyphenol, and antioxidant properties according to Nowacka et al. [69 (link)] with slight modifications. The dried material was ground in an analytical mill (IKA A11 basic; IKA-Werke GmbH, Staufen, Germany). For a falcon with a capacity of 15 mL, about 0.3 g of the material and 10 mL of the extraction reagent (80% ethyl alcohol + 0.1 M hydrochloric acid in the ratio 85:15) was added. Anthocyanin is more stable under acid conditions [70 (link)]. Extraction was performed on a shaker (Multi Reax, Heidolph Instruments, Schwabach, Germany) for 12 h at room temperature and with limited access to light. The solution was centrifuged for 2 min at 3000 rpm in a laboratory centrifuge (MegaStar 600, VWR, Leuven, Belgium). The supernatant was placed in 0.2 mL PCR tubes. Two extractions were made for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Propolis Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction step was carried out as described by Oruç et al. (2017 ) with slight modifications. Briefly, 1 g of propolis sample was extracted with 20 mL of 70% EtOH at ambient temperature for 1 h using a multi‐vortex (Multi Reax, Heidolph, Germany), and then the sample was ultrasonicated for 15 min (Wise Clean, DAIHAN Scientific, Korea). The propolis extract was filtered using Whatman filter paper (No: 1), and the filtrates were concentrated using a rotary evaporator at 40°C at 200 rpm. The dried extract was dissolved in 2 mL of absolute methanol and kept at 4°C until used. Appropriate dilutions were made, and the diluted extracts were used for the determination of phenolic compounds by LC–MS/MS and also for the determination of total phenolics (TP) content (Oruç et al., 2017 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lipid Extraction Optimization for Biomass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The control lipid extraction method used in this experiment was based on the method developed by Folch et al.14 (link). Lyophilized biomass was divided into five replicates of 150 mg in 15 ml centrifuge tubes and added 20 volumes (3 ml) of either dichloromethane/methanol (2:1 v/v, DCM/MeOH), hexane/isopropanol (2:1 v/v, hexane/IPA) or hexane. Following the addition of solvent, the samples were subjected to the following treatments: No treatment (control), stirring using a shaker (Heidolph Multireax) at 1000 RPM for 60 min at room temperature (mixing), and sonication at 20 kHz for 10 min (sonication) on ice. The samples were then added 3 ml MiliQ water added 5% NaCl and centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 G, before the organic phase was transferred to a 4 ml vial and evaporated under nitrogen. The extraction procedure was repeated once without physical treatment for each sample, and the yield was determined gravimetrically for each extraction respectively as percent of AFDW. Finally, the samples were dissolved (10 mg/ml) in DCM/MeOH (2:1 v/v) and stored at -80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extraction and Analysis of Snack Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The baked and cooled snacks were ground in an analytical mill A 11 basic (IKA Poland Sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland). Approx. 0.3 g of ground material was weighed on an analytical balance to the nearest 0.0001 g into a 15 mL plastic falcon and mixed with 10 mL of extraction reagent (80% ethyl alcohol). Extraction was carried out on a shaker Multi Reax (Heidolph Instruments GmbH & Co., Schwabach, Germany) for 24 h at 6000 rpm at room temperature. Samples were centrifuged for 2 min at 5000 rpm using a laboratory centrifuge MegaStar 600 (VWR International Sp. z o.o., Gdańsk, Poland). The supernatant was transferred to resealable 0.2 mL tubes. Three extracts were made for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Vibrio alginolyticus in Mussel Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mussel samples were transported to the laboratory in refrigerated conditions and processed within 6 h from the collection. Samples were externally cleaned with potable water. In aseptic working conditions, about 10 individuals were opened and the flesh meat and intervalvular fluids were pooled together, and 25 g of bivalve sample were homogenized in a blender and tenfold diluted with alkaline saline peptone water (ASPW) (10−1 dilution). Sediment samples (10 g) were tenfold diluted with ASPW and vortex-mixed for 15 min at 2000× g with the Multi Reax (Heidolph, Germany) (10−1 dilution). Water and phytoplankton-net samples were vortex-mixed for 15 min at 2000× g with the Multi Reax. From seawater and net-phytoplankton raw samples and the 10−1 dilution of mussel and sediment samples further serial dilutions (10−1 to 10−4) were prepared in ASPW (1 + 9 mL); then, 1 mL of each dilution was surface-spread plated on TCBS agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) and incubated at 37 ± 1 °C for 18 ± 3 h. After incubation, yellow colonies growing on TCBS agar plates were counted (only plates with 3 to 150 colonies were considered) for V. alginolyticus enumeration [51 (link),52 (link)]. The results were reported as UFC per gram of mussels/sediment or UFC per milliliter of water/phytoplankton-net sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isotope Dilution and Matrix-Matched Calibration for Accurate Mycotoxin Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To improve the accuracy of the measurements, for the analytes for which U-[13C]-labelled homologues were available, standard isotope dilution assay (SIDA) was performed. In the case of the sulfates derivates, matrix-matched calibration was carried out. For that, several blank oat samples were extracted by weighting 5 g of oat flour and mixing it with 10 mL acetonitrile and 10 mL water, shaking for 30 min (Multi Reax, Heidolph Instruments GmbH and Co.KG, Schwabach), centrifuging at 3800 g for 30 min (Megafuge 16, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Braunschweig, Germany), collecting 1 mL of the supernatant and mixing it with 250 mg of anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Then, the samples were centrifuged at 17,000 g for 5 min (Microfuge R, Beckmann, Krefeld, Germany) and all the resulting extract collected in a vial for further use.
Finally, three eight-point series of calibration solutions were prepared: one containing ZEN (8.008–500.5 ng/mL), α-ZEL (1.1047–69.074 ng/mL), β-ZEL (2.776–173.5 ng/L) and their respective U-[13C]-labelled homologues, dissolved in acetonitrile:water (25:75, v/v); one containing a series of calibration solutions of ZEN-14-S (0.858–546.25 ng/mL) and another one containing α-ZEL-14-S (0.853–947.1 ng/mL) and β-ZEL-14-S (0.6092–676.35 ng/mL), both dissolved in blank matrix extract (25%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Meat Extract Preparation for NMR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bones, rind, subcutaneous fat, and innards were removed from the meat samples. Following mixing, the samples were freeze-dried and ground in a cryomill (SamplePrep6870 Freezer Mill, C3 Process and Analysis Technology GmbH, Haar, Germany). The ground, dry samples were stored in a freezer (−20°C) until use. The meat powder (500 mg) was extracted with 6 mL of water. After the samples were mixed on a test tube shaker (Multi Reax, Heidolph, Schwabach, Germany) for 10 min, samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm [relative centrifugal force (RCF), 1,690 x g] for 15 min. The aqueous supernatant was passed through a syringe filter (Chromafil Xtra PET −45/25, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) into a centrifuge tube. The 3 kDa ultrafiltration filters (Vivaspin®, Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany) were rinsed three times with 2 mL of water each to remove glycerol [10 min at 3,000 rpm, relative centrifugal force (RCF), 1,690 × g]. After the cleaning step, 800 μL of the meat extract was transferred to the 3 kDa ultrafiltration unit, and samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm [relative centrifugal force (RCF), 1690 × g] for 1.5 h. An aliquot of the obtained filtrate (500 μL) was mixed with 250 μL of 3 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 6) and 75 μL of TSP (dissolved in D2O). A 600 μL-aliquot of this mixture was transferred to a 5-mm Boro 300-5-8 (Deutero, Bad Kreuznach, Germany) NMR tube.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Shellfish Toxin Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The official EU-RL (European Union Reference Laboratory) LC-MS/MS method [81 ,82 ] was adopted. Shellfish homogenate (2.00 ± 0.05 g) was extracted twice with 9 mL of methanol. After the first methanol addition, the sample was vortex-mixed for 3 min at 2000 rpm with a Multi Reax (Heidolph, Germany), the extract centrifuged for 10 min at 2000 × g and the supernatant transferred to a 20 mL volumetric flask. During the second methanol addition, the mixture was homogenized with an Ultra Turrax T25 mixer (IKA Works, Wilmington, NC, USA) for 1 min at 10,000 rpm, the extract centrifuged (10 min at 2000 × g), the supernatant was combined with the first extract and the whole extraction volume brought to final volume of 20 mL with methanol. An aliquot of the methanolic extract was filtered through a 0.2-µm syringe filter (Minisart, Sartorius, Germany) and submitted to AZAs determination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!