The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Magna pure 96 dna

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in Germany, Switzerland, France, United States

The MagNA Pure 96 DNA is a fully automated nucleic acid extraction system designed for high-throughput processing of DNA samples. The system utilizes magnetic bead-based technology to efficiently extract and purify DNA from a wide range of sample types, making it a versatile tool for various research and diagnostic applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

42 protocols using magna pure 96 dna

1

Bacterial DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After bacterial culture, colonies were resuspended in 500 μL of water and bacterial pellets were digested using MagNA Pure 96 DNA Bacterial Lysis Buffer and proteinase K. DNA extraction was performed on a MagNA Pure 96 System (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany) using the MagNA Pure 96 DNA and Viral NA SV Kit. Quantification and purity checks (260/280 and 260/230 ratios) were performed using NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) before external sequencing by Helixio (Saint-Beauzire, France3). Qubit quantification was carried out prior to sequencing. Library preparations were made using 1 ng of DNA and the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, United States) and validation of the libraries was performed on a bioanalyzer with the High Sensitivity DNA Assay kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, United States) in order to obtain sizes ranging from 250 to 1,500 base pairs (bp). Paired-end sequencing was then performed on a NextSeq500 (Illumina). Quality was controlled using FastQC v0.11.3 (Wingett and Andrews, 2018 (link)). De novo assemblies were produced using SPAdes v3.10.1 (Bankevich et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Data Collection for Respiratory Infection Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data collection of this TTT-study was described previously [13 (link)]. In short, all available clinical data (including biomarkers tested for routine care, a study specific nasal swab and information from a 28-day follow-up assessment) was recorded in an electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) [13 (link)]. A multiplex PCR-based assay of the 14 most common respiratory pathogens (nine viruses, five bacteria) was performed on all nasal swabs (MagnaPure LC total nucleic acid kit and MagnaPure 96 DNA, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) [15 (link)]. The PCR results were not available for the attending physician, since this assay was performed after completion of the recruitment process.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genotyping of Korean Biobank Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA samples were extracted from 200 μL of dispensed whole blood using a Roche MagNA Pure 96 System with Roche MagNa Pure 96 DNA and Viral NA Small Volume Kit. Two hundred microliters of DNA samples were genotyped following the manufacturer’s instructions on a ThermoFisher GeneTitan™ Multi-Channel Instrument with the Axiom® Korea Biobank Array v1.1 chip. Genotype result CEL files were transformed into a PLINK input format file (ped format) using the Axiom® Analysis Suite program. Samples not reaching the cut-off criteria, Dish QC (DQC) ≥0.82 and call rate ≥0.97, were re-genotyped using another KoreanChip. Genotyped files were analyzed using PLINK (Ver. 1.90) [23 (link)]. SNPs classified as Mendelian inconsistencies (--mendel-multigen) were regarded as missing and SNPs with low genotyping rates (<0.05), low minor allele frequency (<0.01), and outlying heterozygosity (<0.31 or >0.33) were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

EBV Genome Sequencing from PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from PBMCs using the MagNA Pure 96 DNA and the Viral NA Small Volume Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Cellular EBV load was then determined using quantitative real-time PCR. Samples that yielded > 100 viral copies/ul were selected for EBV genome sequencing.
We used the previously described enrichment procedure to increase the relative abundance of EBV compared to host DNA41 (link). Shortly, baits covering the EBV type 1 and 2 reference genomes were used to selectively capture viral DNA according to the SureSelect Illumina paired-end sequencing library protocol. Samples were then multiplexed and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq sequencer41 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SARS-CoV-2 Detection via RT-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RT-qPCR was performed amplifying the E gene [11] (link) and mCMV-ie as internal control as described previously [12] (link). Amplification was performed using TaqPath 1-Step RTqPCR Master Mix (Thermofisher) on Quantstudio 5 systems (Thermofisher). RNA extraction was performed using the MagNA Pure 96 DNA and Viral NA Small Volume Kit (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer's instructions and was eluted in 100 µl. Any valid amplification signal of SARS-CoV-2 RNA above the validated threshold was considered a positive result.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nucleic Acid Extraction from Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleic acid extraction was performed using Magna Pure 96DNA and viral nucleic acid small volume kit on a Magna Pure 96 instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The Pathogen Universal-200 purification protocol was used. A total of 200 μl volume of sample material was used for extraction, and the nucleic acids were eluted into 50 μl of elution buffer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative ZIKV RNA Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from patient samples and culture supernatants using MagNA Pure 96 DNA and Viral RNA Small Volume kits® on a MagNA Pure 96TM instrument (Roche, France). ZIKV RNA was detected by amplification of an NS5 fragment (Real Star Zika virus RT-PCR kit 1.0, Altona Diagnostic GmbH, Germany) using a Light Cycler 480 instrument (Roche Molecular Systems). The limit of detection was 150 copies/mL. Both assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Internal standards were used to correct for potential variation in the amount of input material. Quantitative RT-PCR values were further normalized and are given as viral RNA copy numbers/mL. Viral stocks were titrated using plaque-forming assay. Kinetic of viral production was determined as RNA copy number per mL, calculated based on a standard curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Viral Shedding in Avian Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantify viral shedding, oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs were collected from the birds at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 days post-inoculation (dpi) and suspended in 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing antibiotics (400 mg/mL of gentamicin). Viral RNA was extracted from 200 µL of the suspension using MagNA Pure 96 DNA and Viral NA Small Volume Kit on the MagNA Pure 96 instrument (Roche Applied Sciences, Penzberg, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative analysis of viral RNA was conducted using the cycle threshold (Ct) value using rRT-PCR targeting the M gene [43 (link)]. It has been demonstrated that Ct values correlate strongly with infectious viral titer [46 (link)]. To convert the Ct value into the EID50 equivalent unit, we generated a standard curve between them as previously described [36 (link)]. Briefly, the HPAI H5N6 challenge virus with a known EID50 titer was serially diluted 10-fold and quantified using rRT-PCR as described above. Ct values of viral 10-fold dilutions were plotted against viral EID50 titers. The resulting standard curve showed a high correlation (r2 > 0.99). The detection limit was 102 EID50 equivalent/mL. Virus titers in samples were calculated by extrapolation of the standard curve equation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Automated Viral Nucleic Acid Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viral RNA or DNA was extracted from 140 μl of sample medium using the MagNA Pure 96 Instrument (Roche Life Science, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Magna Pure 96 DNA and RAN NA small volume kit).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

DNA Extraction from Leishmania Smears

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA for the Leishmania infantum PCR and PARR analyses was extracted from the smears prepared for the lymph node cytology. Cell material was rubbed from the smears with a swab saturated by a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution. Subsequently, the DNA was extracted from this swab using a commercial kit MagNA Pure 96 DNA and Viral NA Small Volume Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturers’ instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!