The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 μm transwell filters

Manufactured by Corning
Sourced in United States

The 8-μM transwell filters are a type of cell culture insert used for various in vitro applications. These filters feature a porous membrane with a pore size of 8 micrometers, which allows for the exchange of media, nutrients, and other components between the upper and lower chambers of the transwell system.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using 8 μm transwell filters

1

Adenovirus-Induced HUVEC Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HUVECs were infected with the indicated adenovirus for 24 hours then plated at 30,000 cells/well in serum-free media on to 8μm Transwell filters (Corning) coated with gelatin (0.1%). Full-serum growth media was added to the lower chamber and cells were allowed to migrate for 6 hours. Unmigrated cells were then removed from the top of the membrane using a cotton swab. Migrated cells were fixed in methanol for 15 minutes and incubated with a DAPI solution (300nM in PBS) for 5 minutes. Random fields were chosen and counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transwell migration and invasion assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transwell migration assay using 786-O, RCC4 and A498 cells, twenty-five thousand cells were plated on 8-μM transwell filters (Corning, NY, USA). For transwell invasion assay, fifty thousand cells were seeded and meanwhile, inserts were coated on the inside with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Cells in insert chambers, which were cultured with no FBS, migrated towards lower compartment that containing medium with FBS. Non-migration and invasion cells were removed with a cotton swab. The remaining cells were stained with crystal violet and photographed. Cells in fifteen random fields were counted under microscope and calculated by GraphPad Prism 6.0 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell migration analysis, 2×105 cells were directly seeded onto 8 μM transwell filters (Corning, Corning, NY) and induced to migrate toward medium containing 10% FBS for 24 h. For cell invasion assays, the filter inserts were first coated with Matrigel prior to seeding the cells, and the rest of experimental protocol was similar to migration assays. Generally, 2×105 serum-starved cells were plated into the upper chamber. Non-invading cells were removed with a swab. The remaining cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with crystal violet, and quantified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration was monitored using a Transwell chamber assay. The SKOV3 and CAOV3 cells (2×105 cells) were plated on 8-μm Transwell filters (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA). The cells were induced with medium to migrate towards medium without FBS for 20 h (5 (link),6 (link)) as follows: i) Serum-free medium; ii) serum-free medium + 20 μM LPA; iii) serum-free medium + 100 ng/ml CXCL12; iv) serum-free medium + 20 μM LPA + 100 ng/ml CXCL12; and v) serum-free medium + 20 μM LPA + 100 ng/ml CXCL12 + 100 ng/ml PTX. Non-migrating cells were removed with a cotton swab. The remaining cells were fixed, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and analyzed using a bright-field microscope (ECLIPSE Ti-S, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transwell Migration and Scratch Wound Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the transwell migration assay, 5 × 104 PANC-1 cells were plated on 8-μm Transwell filters (Corning). For the invasion assay, 1 × 105 cells were added to the upper chamber of each insert, coated with 150 μg Matrigel (BD Biosciences). The cells were induced to migrate toward medium containing 20% FBS for 24 h (for migration assay) and 48 h (for invasion assay) in the CO2 incubator. Non-invading cells were removed with a cotton swab. The remaining cells were fixed and stained in dye solution containing 0.1% crystal violet and 20% methanol. The cells that had migrated or invaded were counted and imaged using an IX71 inverted microscope (Olympus Corp.). Ten random fields were chosen, and cell numbers were averaged.
For the scratch wound-healing assay, when the transfected/infected cells reached 80% confluence, a wound was created by scratching with a 200-μl pipette tip. After scratching, the detached cells were removed by washing twice and then the cells were maintained in fresh medium. Cells were imaged at 0 and 24 h after scratching, and the migration distance was calculated by measuring the width of the wound.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Migration and Invasion Assay of Trophoblast Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The migration and invasion capacities of HTR-8/SVneo and JAR cells were determined with 8 μm Transwell filters (Corning, USA). The transfected cells were resuspended in serum-free medium and added to the upper chambers of the Transwell. Medium containing 20% FBS was added to the lower chambers. In the migration assay, the cells were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere and allowed to migrate to the bottom of the well. These cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and then stained with crystal violet [25 (link)]. In the invasion test, the upper chamber was coated with diluted Matrigel (BD Biosciences, USA), and after 48 hours of culture, the cells were fixed and stained. Five fields of view were randomly selected for observation under the microscope. The experiment was performed in triplicate [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell migration analysis, cells were directly seeded into 8-μM transwell filters (Corning, Corning, NY, USA). The major difference in cell invasion analysis is that Matrigel was added into the upper compartment of the transwell, and the remaining experimental protocol was similar to that of the migration assay. Briefly, cells (5 × 104) suspended in a serum-free medium were seeded onto the upper compartment of the transwell, and the lower chambers were filled with medium containing 10% FBS and various concentrations of CTD. After 24 h, noninvading cells were removed and the migrating and invading cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 100% methanol and then stained with 0.5% crystal violet for 10 min. Finally, the cells were photographed under a microscope (magnification, 100×) and counted using the Image-Pro Plus software (v.6.1) program (Media Cybernetics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration was evaluated using 8-μm transwell filters (Costar Corning, Schiphol-Rijk, The Netherlands). Cells at a density of 5 × 104 were seeded to the upper chamber, and the chamber was filled with FBS-free medium. Cells were incubated overnight to allow for adherence; then, the lower chamber was replaced with 10% FBS medium as a chemo-attractant. Following a 24 h incubation, non-migrating cells on the upper surface of the insert membrane were gently removed by cotton swabs and migrated cells on the lower surface of the insert membrane were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min. Migrated cells on each membrane were photographed and counted at 100× magnification field at six random fields.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The effect of AR silencing on cell migration was performed using 8-μm transwell filters (Costar, Corning, NY) with modification as described previously 39 (link). For the invasion assay, the upper compartment was coated with 50 μg Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) to form a matrix barrier. A suspension of cells (20 × 104 per filter for migration and 40 x 104 per filter for invasion) in medium containing 1% FBS and 0.1% BSA was added to the upper compartment. The lower compartment was filled with 400 μl basal medium containing 10% FBS as chemoattractant. After 24 h for migration or 48 h for invasion, the non-migratory cells on the upper surface were removed by a cotton swab and the cells on the lower surface were fixed and stained with the Diff-Quick solution (Dade Behring, Deerfield, Illinois). Migrated or invaded cells in each transwell filter were counted from ten randomly chosen fields. The experiment was performed in quadruplicate and repeated three times independently.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!