The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Guava viacount viability assay

Manufactured by Merck Group

The Guava ViaCount viability assay is a laboratory instrument designed for the assessment of cell viability. It provides a quantitative analysis of live and dead cells within a sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using guava viacount viability assay

1

Proliferative Effects of Etomoxir and siCPT2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine proliferative effects of etomoxir treatment, cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 100,000–150,000 cells per well and cultured in the presence of 0 or 200 µM etomoxir. Cells were harvested at 24, 48 and 72 h. Cell counts were determined using the Countess Automated Cell Counter (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instruction, and cell viability was assessed by performing the flow cytometry-based Guava ViaCount viability assay (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. To determine proliferative effects of siCPT2 treatment, cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 100,000–150,000 cells per well and transfected with siNT or siCPT2 as described above. Cells were harvested at 24, 48 and 72 h and cell counts were determined using the Countess Automated Cell Counter (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Three independent biological replicates were performed for each time-point and condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Screening Spindle Genes in RPE Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To screen spindle genes in RPE-NEO and RPE-MYC, cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 50,000 cells/well and transfected with 50 nM siRNA as described above or treated with 10 μM of the CDK1 inhibitor Purvalanol A (P4484, Sigma) (Figure 4A). Cells were harvested after 72 h and cell viability was assessed by performing the flow cytometry-based Guava ViaCount Viability Assay (4000–0040, Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For further validation of the effects of siTPX2 treatment, cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 100,000 cells per well and transfected with 1.7 nM siRNA as described above. Cells were harvested at 72 hours and cell viability determined using the PrestoBlue Cell Viability Reagent (A13261, Thermo Fisher) (Figure 5E) or the Countess Automated Cell Counter and Trypan Blue Stain (0.4%) (Invitrogen) (Figure 5D) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Viability and Cell Cycle Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell viability was determined using a flow-cytometry-based Guava ViaCount viability assay (Millipore), performed according to the manufacturer’s instruction. For cell-cycle analysis, cells were fixed by dropwise addition of ice-cold EtOH and storage at −20C. Fixed cells were stained with propidium iodide, and samples were analyzed on a LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Cell populations were gated to exclude doublets. Sub2N levels were determined using FlowJo (Tree Star) analysis software. Univariate cell-cycle analysis was performed by excluding dead cells and using the Watson model cell-cycle analysis program provided by FlowJo analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Proliferative Effects of Etomoxir and siCPT2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine proliferative effects of etomoxir treatment, cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 100,000–150,000 cells per well and cultured in the presence of 0 or 200 µM etomoxir. Cells were harvested at 24, 48 and 72 h. Cell counts were determined using the Countess Automated Cell Counter (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instruction, and cell viability was assessed by performing the flow cytometry-based Guava ViaCount viability assay (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. To determine proliferative effects of siCPT2 treatment, cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 100,000–150,000 cells per well and transfected with siNT or siCPT2 as described above. Cells were harvested at 24, 48 and 72 h and cell counts were determined using the Countess Automated Cell Counter (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Three independent biological replicates were performed for each time-point and condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!