The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss windows version

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a wide range of data analysis and management capabilities, including data manipulation, statistical modeling, and reporting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

6 protocols using spss windows version

1

Comparative Efficacy of Treatment Regimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are presented as the mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA for comparison of 2 different treatment groups at different time courses and unpaired Student's t test for comparison between 2 groups were performed using SPSS Windows (Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc.). P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Factors Influencing Modern Contraceptive Use

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were checked for completeness and consistencies during the data collection, and then cleaned, coded and entered into a Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) windows version 21 computer software for analysis. Frequency checks were made for each study variable and further cleaning and cross checks were made to ensure the consistency of the study variables among respondents. Descriptive analysis was made and measures of central tendency were determined. Logistic regression models were applied to assess the presence of an association between the dependent variable (modern contraceptive use) and the independent variables at (P < 0.05). Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were described in detail for explanatory variables. Findings related to the study objectives were presented in text, graph, and tables.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Diabetes Self-Management Intervention Trial

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or frequency. Baseline and 6-month data were compared using a paired t-test, after normality of the data was confirmed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. When normality was not confirmed for some of the data sets (eg, baseline and 6-month blood glucose monitor in both groups; 6-month foot care in the intervention group and baseline foot care in the control group; baseline medication in the intervention group and 6-month medication in the control group), the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used. An independent t-test was used to compare the change in outcomes between the intervention and control groups. Again, normality of these data was confirmed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. For some of the data sets (change in blood glucose monitor, foot care and medication from baseline to post 6 months in the intervention group), normality was not confirmed, therefore the Mann–Whitney U-test. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS windows version 13.0, and P-value <0.05 was considered for statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bivariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were entered using EpiData and exported to SPSS windows version 20.0 for analysis. Both descriptive and analytical analyses were done. The descriptive results have been presented by tables and graphs. Bivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify associations between independent and study variables. The possible effects of confounders were controlled through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The association between the explanatory and dependent variables were assessed at p value of 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Survival Analysis of Patient Cohorts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The categorical data are reported as the number or percentage of observations while continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviations of the values. The differences between categorical variables were assessed by a chi-square test. Differences between groups of continuous variables that were non-parametrically distributed were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis tests. Univariate analysis of variables was performed by using univariate cox regression analysis. All variables selected on univariate analysis (p < 0.05) were included in the multivariate analysis. Multivariate prognostic analyses were performed by using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with a log-rank test was performed to compare the OS of patients in different the groups. P values < 0.05 are considered statistically significant. All statistical procedures were performed using SPSS Windows (version 21; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Glimepiride's Glycemic Impact

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normally distributed data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and non-normally distributed data median or as numbers and percentages. Non-normally distributed data were logtransformed for use with parametric statistics. Unpaired t test was used to compare the differences in clinical characteristics between groups at baseline and after treatment assessed for significance using for the discrete or continuous data and the chi-square test for frequency distributions. The changes in HbA1c, FBG and 2 h-BG over time (at baseline and at the other 2 visits) were studied using the repeated measurements ANOVA with treatment as grouping factor. Paired t tests were used to compare within-group changes. And unpaired t tests were also used to compare baseline variables between Responders and Non-responders in subjects treated with glimepiride-added. Linear regressions were performed to determine relationships between changes in serum HMW adiponectin levels and changes in HbA1c. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS windows version 18.0, and p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!