The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hct ultra ion trap

Manufactured by Bruker
Sourced in Germany

The HCT Ultra Ion Trap is a high-performance mass spectrometer that utilizes ion trap technology for accurate and sensitive analysis of a wide range of molecular compounds. It is designed to provide reliable and reproducible results for various applications in analytical chemistry, life sciences, and materials research.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using hct ultra ion trap

1

Analytical Characterization of Resveratrol Glycosides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To reveal the synthesis of resveratrol glycosides, the reactions were examined by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using silica gel G/UV254 polyester plates (Macherey-Nagel) and a mobile phase of ethyl acetate:methanol:water in 10:2:1 (v/v). The plates were first visualized under 254 nm UV light and then by immersion on a solution of 5% sulfuric acid in methanol followed by heating for 12 min at 100 °C.
To identify the products observed in TLC, the corresponding reactions were analyzed by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) in an HCT ultra ion trap (Bruker Daltonics) using methanol as the ionizing phase in the positive and negative reflector modes. The data were processed with the Masshunter Data Acquisition B.05.01 and Masshunter Qualitative Analysis B.07.00 softwares (Agilent Technologies). The expected glycosides and xylooligosaccharides were detected as sodium adducts in the positive mode and resveratrol was observed as its hydrogen adduct in the negative mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polyphenols Identification by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC–MS analysis was carried out on Agilent 1200 LC with a Bruker HCT Ultra Ion Trap for MS detection and a photodiode array detector (DAD) for UV/V is measurements. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile/water, both with 0.1% formic acid. The gradient increased from 2–95% of acetonitrile over 1 min. The column used was Phenomenex Kinetex (50 × 2.1 mm and 2.6 µm particle size). The flow rate applied for the analysis was 1.3 mL/min. Putative identification of the polyphenols was done using information available on the phenol explorer database [44 ] and the information published by Lopez et al. (2013) [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive HPLC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC was from Agilent (Waldbronn, Germany). Pump: Agilent 1100 G1312A binary pump; autosampler: Agilent 1200 G1321B ALS SL; detector: Agilent 1100 G1315B DAD. The software used was Bruker HyStar V. 3.2 (Bremen, Germany), and the mass spectrometer was from Bruker (HCT Ultra Ion Trap with electrospray ionization). The column was an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18, 3.5 mm × 150 mm (3.5 µm). The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min at a temperature of 40 °C, with solvent system A = 0.5% formic acid and B = acetonitrile and a gradient as follows: 0 min 1% B, 8 min 1% B, 15 min 5% B, 40 min 20% B, 45 min 30% B, 50 min 95% B, 55 min 1% B, and 60 min 1% B. Compound identification was done by the isocontour plot of the HPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis from λ 200 to 600 nm and the DAD chromatogram at a wavelength of λ 520 nm for anthocyanins and λ 320 nm and λ 360 nm for the copigments, as well as by mass spectra data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC-PDA-ESI-MS/MS Analysis of Anthocyanins and Copigments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC system (1100/1200 series, Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) includes a binary pump (G1312A), an autosampler (G1329B), and a DAD-detector (G1316A). It was coupled to an HCT Ultra Ion Trap mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) with an electrospray ionization source (ESI). The anthocyanins and copigments were separated on a Luna C18(2) 3 µ column (150 × 2.0 mm, Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA)) using water/acetonitrile/formic acid (95/3/2; v/v/v) (eluent A) and water/acetonitrile/formic acid (48/50/2; v/v/v) (eluent B) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. Gradient elution was performed: 0 min 6% B, 30 min 35% B, 35 min 40% B, 45 min 90% B, 50 min 90% B, 55 min 30% B, 70 min 6% B. The ESI source was operated in alternating mode (+/−3000 V) (positive mode for anthocyanins and negative mode for copigments), using nitrogen as the nebulizer (50 psi) and drying gas (10 L/min, 365 °C). The sample extracts (around 2 mg) were dissolved in 2 mL of eluent A with a pH of 2.52 so that the flavylium cation form of the anthocyanins was stabilized. Aliquots of 5 µL of each sample were analyzed by the HPLC-PDA-ESI-MS/MS method described above according to Ostberg-Potthoff et al. [33 (link)] using the Bruker Hystar 3.2, Bruker ESICompass 1.3 for HCT/Esquire, and Data Analysis Version 3.0 software packages (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nano-LC-MS/MS Identification of Tryptic Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tryptic peptides were resuspended in 0.1% formic acid following the previous preparation. Triplicate samples were injected into an ion trap mass spectrometer (HCT Ultra Ion Trap, Bruker Daltonics, Germany) linked to a nano-LC system (Ultimate 3000 LC System, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The peptide mixture was fractionated using a reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography column (Acclaim PepMapTM 100 Å, 75 µm × 5 cm, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Leicestershire, UK and PepSwift Monolithic Trap Column 200 µm × 5 cm Thermo Fisher Scientific, Leicestershire, UK). The mobile phases consisted of buffer A (0.1% formic acid in H2O) and buffer B (0.1% formic acid in 80% acetonitrile) as eluting peptides. The elution with linear gradient was run as follows: 4–70% of solvent B at 0–20 min (the time point of retention time), followed by 90% of solvent B at 20–25 min to remove all peptides in the column and 96% solvent A for 15 min for column re-equilibration. Finally, mass spectra of gradient eluted peptides were examined using a MS1 precursor scan (m/z 400–1500) in Data-Dependent Acquisition (DDA) mode. The five most abundant multiple charged precursor ions were selected for MS2 fragmentation from a MS2 scan (m/z 200–2800).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Proteomic Profiling of Fasciola hepatica Eggs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For mass spectrometric analyses, we used approx. 600 eggs per replicate in each group. F. hepatica eggs were lysed in SDT buffer (4% SDS, 0.1 M DTT, 0.1 M Tris/HCl, pH 7.6) in a thermomixer (Eppendorf ThermoMixer C, 30 min, 95 °C, 750 rpm) with added glass beads. After that, the samples were centrifuged (15 min, 20,000×g) and collected supernatants used for filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) as described elsewhere35 (link) using 0.5 μg of trypsin per sample (sequencing grade, Promega Corporation). The resulting peptides were used for LC–MS/MS analyses. Once sample preparation was complete, the total amount of peptides was estimated using RSLCnano system online coupled with HCTUltra ion trap (Bruker Corporation), which is based on the area under total ion current curve using MEC cell line tryptic digest as an external calibrant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Electrospray Mass Spectrometry of Mutant Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
25 μM protein samples were prepared in 10 mM ammonium acetate, pH 7.4. Methanol (10% v/v final concentration) was added to the protein samples immediately prior to infusion via a syringe pump at a rate of 250 mL h−1. Positive-ion electrospray mass spectra of the mutant proteins (25 mM, 10 mM ammonium acetate, pH 7.4, 10% methanol) were acquired on either a Bruker Daltonics HCTultra Ion Trap or a Bruker Daltonics MicrOTOF mass spectrometer. Typical acquisition times were 1.5 min using an m/z range of 500–3000. Data were averaged, smoothed, baseline-subtracted and deconvoluted onto a true mass scale in Bruker Daltonics Compass DataAnalysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Filter-Aided Proteomic Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microdissected tissue samples were lysed in SDT buffer (4% SDS, 0.1M DTT, 0.1M Tris/HCl, pH 7.6) in a thermomixer (Eppendorf ThermoMixer® C, 30 min, 95°C, 750 rpm). After that, samples were centrifuged (15 min, 20,000 x g) and the supernatant used for filter-aided sample preparation as described elsewhere [46 (link)] using 0.5 μg/sample of trypsin (sequencing grade, Promega). Resulting peptides were used for LC-MS/MS analyses. Total peptide amount after sample preparation was estimated using LC-MS analysis on RSLCnano system online coupled with HCTUltra ion trap (Bruker Daltonics) based on the area under the total ion current curve, whereby MEC cell line tryptic digest was used as external calibrant. For final analyses, we used app. 2 μg of tryptic digests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microdissected Tissue Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microdissected tissue samples were lysed in SDT buffer (4% SDS, 0.1M DTT, 0.1M Tris/HCl, pH 7.6) in a thermomixer (Eppendorf ThermoMixer® C, 30 min, 95°C, 750 rpm).
After that, samples were centrifuged (15 min, 20,000 x g) and the supernatant used for filteraided sample preparation as described elsewhere [46] (link) using 0.5 μg/sample of trypsin (sequencing grade, Promega). Resulting peptides were used for LC-MS/MS analyses. Total peptide amount after the sample preparation was estimated using LC-MS analysis on
RSLCnano system online coupled with HCTUltra ion trap (Bruker Daltonics) based on the area under the total ion current curve, using MEC cell line tryptic digest as external calibrant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!