The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Perfectstart green qpcr supermix kit

Manufactured by Transgene
Sourced in China, Switzerland, United States

The PerfectStart Green qPCR SuperMix kit is a reagent designed for use in real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) applications. The kit contains all the necessary components, including a DNA polymerase, buffer, and a green fluorescent dye, to amplify and detect target DNA sequences in a qPCR reaction.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

37 protocols using perfectstart green qpcr supermix kit

1

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Moss Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate the expression levels of DGEs in transcriptome Sequencing, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis were performed. Total RNA was isolated from moss gametophytes and 0.5 ng of total RNA were used to synthesize the first-strand cDNA using the TransScript® All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR with One-Step gDNA Removal Kits (Transgen, Beijing, China). The Actin-1 gene of L. pyriforme was identified as the best reference gene to normalize the template. The gene specific primers were listed in Supplementary Table 1. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed using PerfectStart® Green qPCR SuperMix Kits (Transgen). The cycling regime is 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of amplification (95°C for 10 s, 57°C for 10 s, and 72°C 10 s) and run on a LightCycler96 qPCR instrument (Roche, Switzerland). Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the comparative Ct (2–ΔΔCt) method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)). The experiments were carried out using three biological replicates from three different experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tissue Distribution and Expression of SPH2A and SPH4 Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue distribution of SPH2A and SPH4 genes was analyzed in healthy fish using PerfectStart Green qPCR SuperMix kits (Transgen, China). Moreover, the mRNA expression levels of SPH2A and SPH4 in control (PBS) and PDD infected tissues (head kidney and liver) were analyzed. The specific primers were designed using premier primer 6.0 software. The β-actin gene was used as an internal reference gene (Table S1). According to the manufacturer's instructions, the thermal profile for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The analysis of each sample was conducted in three replicates. The relative expression levels of genes were calculated according to the comparative threshold cycle method (2−ΔΔCT) and shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) [30] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Validating Moss Transcriptome Differential Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We conducted a quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis (qPCR) analysis to validate the expression levels of differentially expressed genes in transcriptome sequencing. The moss gametophytes were used to isolate total RNA, and 0.5 μg of that RNA was used to synthesize the first-strand cDNA with TransScript® All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR with One-Step gDNA Removal Kits (Transgen Biotech Company, Beijing, China). We assessed the expression stability of GAPDH (Poh0204970.1), Actin 1 (Poh0314480.1), and tubulin beta-1 chain (Poh0012540.1) genes under cold stress. The GAPDH gene was identified as the best reference gene to normalize the template. The gene specific primers were listed in Supplementary Table 1. qPCR analysis was performed using PerfectStart® Green qPCR SuperMix Kits (Transgen) on a LightCycler96 qPCR instrument (Roche, Switzerland). The cycling regime is 94°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of amplification (94°C for 10 s, 58°C for 15 s, and 72°C 10 s). The relative gene expression levels were calculated using the comparative Ct (2–ΔΔCt) method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)). The experiments were carried out using three biological replicates from three different experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Gene Expression in Bovine Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After processing the beef tissues, we used RNAiso Plus Kit (Trizol, Takara, Beijing, China) to extract the total RNA from the beef heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, muscle, and adipose tissues. The cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription kit (PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Ewraser, Takara, Beijing, China). The DNA and CDS region sequences of hub genes were downloaded from the NCBI database for primer design. Then, the designed primer sequences were uploaded to BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) for specificity test. Primer sequences are shown in Table 1. The relative expression levels of hub genes in adult cattle heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, muscle, and adipose tissue were measured, and the expression levels of hub genes in the adult cattle and the newborn calves' adipose tissue were compared. Quantitative real-time PCR were performed using the PerfectStart Green qPCR SuperMix kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China), and the results were obtained. It should be noted that three biological replicates and technical replicates were performed for all experiments. SPSS 25 (37 (link)) and Graphpad Prism 9 (38 (link)) softwares were used for difference significance analysis and mapping, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying PLOD mRNA Expression in Bladder Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression level of PLODs’ mRNA was quantified using qRT-PCR. The primers were listed as follows: Human PLOD1_F:GCCGTTTGTGTCCCTGTTCTTC; Human PLOD1_R:ATGCTGTGCCAGGAACTCTTCC; Human PLOD2_F:GACAGCGTTCTCTTCGTCCTCA; Human PLOD2_R:CTCCAGCCTTTTCGTGGTGACT; Human PLOD3_F:CGAGTGTGAGTTCTACTTCAGCC; Human PLOD3_R:CCAGAAGTTGGACCACAGCTTG; GAPDH forward GTCTCCTCTGACTTCAACAGCG, GAPDH reverse: ACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAA. The first step was to generate the cDNA by extracting RNA from 20 pairs of bladder cancer and adjacent normal tissues and bladder cancer cell lines (T24 and BIU) by Trizol Reagent (Cowin Biotech Co., Ltd., China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All qRT-PCRs were conducted under the constant settings (95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15s and 60 °C for 1 min) using the PerfectStart Green qPCR SuperMix kit (TransGen Biotech Co, Ltd, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

qPCR and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA of cells was isolated by Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA), following the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was then synthesized from total RNA via reverse transcription using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT kit (TOYOBO life science, Shanghai, China). The miRNA and mRNA were amplified using a PerfectStart Green qPCR SuperMix Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) on a SYBR Green real-time PCR platform (Thermo fisher scientific, CA). U6 and β-actin were used as internal controls. The relative expression of each group was analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Proteins extracted from the hPASMCs were detected using a standard WB protocol. β-actin was used as an internal control. An antibody against Kv2.1 (# 19963-1-AP, NM_004975) was purchased from Proteintech (Chicago, IL), and an antibody against β-actin (# TA-09) was purchased from Zhong Shan Jin Qiao Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). The rabbit IgG (7074S, Cell Signaling Technology) and goat antimouse IgG (SA00001-1; Proteintech, Wuhan, China) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase were used as secondary antibodies. All other regular chemicals were purchased from standard commercial sources.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Gene Expression Analysis by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using an RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen), following the manufacturer’s protocols. GAPDH was used as an internal reference gene [73 ], and Primer Premier 5.0 was used to design primers for the target gene (Supplementary Data Table S3). qRT–PCR was performed on a CFX96™ Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using a PerfectStart Green qPCR SuperMix Kit (TransGen Biotech Co. Ltd.). Relative gene expression was calculated using 2−ΔΔCt [74 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Tobacco Leaf Fluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For fluorescence quantification of tobacco leaves, the relative intensities of SMV-GFP/TMV-GFP were processed and quantified with software Image J v1.8.0 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The fluorescence intensity of each gene was subjected to 10 technical replicates. For virus titer detection, total RNA was isolated from mixed samples of corresponding infection areas of 10 individual leaves and first-strand cDNA was synthesized after co-infiltrating tobacco leaves with different viral infectious clones and candidate genes for 4 days. The control group (EV) used pCambia1300 empty vector and corresponding viral infectious clones for mixed infection, and their antiviral activity was determined by comparing the accumulation level of the virus after adding the genes we screened. RT-qPCR was performed using the Applied Biosystems ViiA 7 using PerfectStart Green qPCR SuperMix Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China, TG-AQ601) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Three biological replicates were performed for each experiment. Graphs were generated by GraphPad Prism 8 (La Jolla, CA, USA), Excel 2019 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Error bars represent the SD of the mean, and significance was indicated when p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nematode RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA of Day 10 nematodes treated as above was extracted using TransZol Up Kit (TransGen Biotech) and reverse‐transcribed with EasyScript® All‐in‐One First‐Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (TransGen Biotech) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative real‐time PCR was carried out on a StepOnePlus Real‐Time PCR Instrument (Applied Biosystems) using PerfectStart® Green qPCR SuperMix Kit (TransGen Biotech) with act‐1 as a reference gene. All reactions were performed in three technical replicates from three biological repeats. The primers of gene transcripts used for the PCR analysis are listed in Table S9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Gene Expression in Tobacco

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA was isolated from the seedlings or young leaves using Plant RNA kit (Omega, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 1 μg of total RNA was reversely transcribed into cDNA using the TransScript All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR (TransGen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qRT-PCR was used to measure transcript levels of CgbHLH001 and stress-related genes. The primers were shown in Supplementary Table 1. qRT-PCR analysis was performed in a LightCycler 96 Real-Time System (Roche, United States); the PCR reaction conditions were as follows: 94°C 30 s; 40 cycles of 94°C 5 s, 60°C 30 s. qPCR was performed with PerfectStart Green qPCR SuperMix kit (TransGen, Beijing, China). Three biological replicates with two technical replicates of each were applied to each treatment, and the 2–ΔΔCT method (Shi and Chiang, 2005 (link)) was employed to calculate the relative expression level of each gene. Ntactin was used as an internal reference for tobacco to normalize the expression level. The relative quantification was described as fold change of gene expression in the test sample compared to the control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!