The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using clampfit 8

1

Statistical Analysis of Electrophysiological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed in Clampfit 8.0 (Axon Instruments, USA) and Sigmaplot (Jandel Scientific, USA) software. Data are mostly presented as box plots, with a box and horizontal bar within representing the interquartile range and median, respectively. Whiskers (error bars) extend to the most extreme data point that is within 1.5 times the interquartile range from the box. When there are less than ten data points then individual data points are shown (Fig 5) or error bars represent one standard deviation from the mean (Fig 4). Elsewhere data is quoted as mean ± standard error mean (s.e.m.), as indicated. A Student's t-test was used to test for statistical differences before and after treatments, or between normal and injured rats, with a significance level of P < 0.05. Power of tests was computed with α = 0.05. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality was applied to each data set, with a P < 0.05 level set for significance. Most data sets were found to be normally distributed, as is required for a t-test. For those that were not normal a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was instead used with P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring L-type Calcium Currents in Myotubes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calcium currents were recorded with the ruptured whole-cell patch-clamp technique in voltage-clamp mode using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments). Patch pipettes (borosilicate glass; Harvard Apparatus) were filled with (mM) 145 Cs-aspartate, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 0.1 Cs-EGTA, and 2 Mg-ATP (pH 7.4 with CsOH) and had a resistance between 1.5 and 3 MΩ. For the recording of the calcium currents, the myotubes were bathed in solution containing (mM) 10 CaCl2, 145 tetraethylammonium chloride, and 10 HEPES (pH 7.4 with tetraethylammonium hydroxide). Data acquisition and command potentials were controlled by pCLAMP software (version 8.0; Axon Instruments); analysis was performed using Clampfit 8.0 (Axon Instruments) and SigmaPlot 8.0 (SPSS Science) software. The current-voltage dependence was fitted according to I=Gmax(VVrev)/1(1+exp((VV1/2)/k)), where, Gmax is the maximum conductance of the L-type calcium currents, Vrev is the extrapolated reversal potential of the calcium current, V1/2 is the potential for half maximal conductance, and k is the slope. The conductance was calculated using G=(I1000)/(VVrev), and its voltage dependence was fitted according to a Boltzmann distribution: G=Gmax/(1+exp((VV1/2)/k)). The statistical significance was calculated using the Mann–Whitney U test (see Tables 1 and 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Electrophysiological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed in Clampfit 8.0 (Axon Instruments, USA) and Sigmaplot (Jandel Scientific, USA) software. Data are mostly presented as box plots, with a box and horizontal bar within representing the interquartile range and median, respectively. Whiskers (error bars) extend to the most extreme data point that is within 1.5 times the interquartile range from the box. When there are less than ten data points then individual data points are shown (Fig 5) or error bars represent one standard deviation from the mean (Fig 4). Elsewhere data is quoted as mean ± standard error mean (s.e.m.), as indicated. A Student's t-test was used to test for statistical differences before and after treatments, or between normal and injured rats, with a significance level of P < 0.05. Power of tests was computed with α = 0.05. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality was applied to each data set, with a P < 0.05 level set for significance. Most data sets were found to be normally distributed, as is required for a t-test. For those that were not normal a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was instead used with P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Charge Dynamics in Single Fibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed using Clampfit 8.0 (Molecular Devices). Further data evaluation, non‐linear fitting, and statistical analysis were conducted using OriginPro 2021 software. Q‐t relationship of each individual fiber was obtained by integration of the capacitive current from t = 0 to t = 10–30 ms elicited by single AP or repetitive AP waveforms. Width of both non‐linear current and charge was quantified as the width at 50% of its maximum amplitude. Qout was quantified by integration of the non‐linear current signal, beginning at the initiation of the depolarization, passing by the maximum outward part of the signal and ending when non‐linear current was equal to zero, just before becoming a negative value. Qin was evaluated from the running integral, from its maximum to the time when it crossed the x‐axis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analysis of Current Responses to Electrical Stimuli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Current responses to various voltage step and ramp protocols were analyzed and measured in Clampfit 8.0 (Molecular Devices). The resulting raw data were graphed and plotted in Origin 8.5 (MicroCal, Northampton, MA). When comparing 2 groups, two-tailed t-tests were performed as appropriate. All data are reported as average ± standard error of the mean with an asterisk (*) indicating that p ≤ 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad software (San Diego, CA), and p-values are reported in the text. Current amplitudes are reported as mean ± SE, with n indicating the number of cells sampled. For western blot quantification, the relative amount of Kir4.1 protein in each lane was normalized to its loading control and then normalized to the total amount of protein in control lanes. The data are reported as mean ± SE with n indicating the number of animals per condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Patch-Clamp Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were collected and analyzed with Clampex 8.0 and Clampfit 8.0 software (Molecular Devices). Access resistance of the patch-clamped neuron was monitored throughout the experiment, and data were discarded if the resistance changed > 15% after obtaining baseline recordings. Data representing mean values are presented with ± SEM. Statistical analysis of differences were tested by paired or un-paired two-tailed Student’s t-test, Welch t-test, and one-way ANOVA. In all cases, *p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Patch-clamp data analysis protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patch-clamp data were analyzed and plotted using Clampfit 8 (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and OriginPro 2021 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). Data are presented as means ± SEM (standard error of the mean) with n indicating the number of cells used for a particular set of measurements. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test was used, while differences between two groups were evaluated using Student’s paired t-test and considered significant at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Electrophysiological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed and displayed using ClampFit 8 (Molecular Devices, Mini Analysis Program (Synaptosoft Inc.,Decatur, GA) and Origin 8.5 (Northampton, MA). All numerical data were expressed as mean ± SEM unless otherwise indicated. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA, two-tailed Student’s t-tests, or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov-test. The level of significance was determined at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Intracellular Calcium and Cardiomyocyte Contractility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the start of the experimental protocol, cells were loaded with the Ca2+ sensitive dye fura-2 AM (5 μM, 20 min, RT, Invitrogen, Burlington, Canada) and intracellular Ca2+ was measured by whole cell photometry (DeltaRam, Photon Technology International, Birmingham, NJ) according to previously described techniques [18 (link),19 (link)]. The emission ratio at 510 nm, during alternate excitation at 340 and 380 nm was used to determine intracellular Ca2+ concentrations. Background fluorescence was determined at each excitation wavelength and subtracted from the recordings. Emission ratios were converted to intracellular Ca2+ concentrations using an in-vitro calibration curve. Unloaded cell shortening was measured with a video edge detector (Crescent Electronics, Sandy, UT). Ten second trains of contractions were averaged and measured with Clampfit 8.2 (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Contraction amplitude is the difference between systolic and diastolic cell length. All values were normalized to the time point immediately prior to ischemia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Electrophysiological Analysis of Inhibitory Synaptic Currents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Current waveforms or extracted data were fit using Clampfit 8.2 (Molecular Devices) and Origin 7.0 (OriginLab, Northhampton, MA). The decay time constant (decay τ) of eIPSCs was estimated by a single-or double-exponential term. If double exponential function was required, we used weighted averages for our analyses.
Statistical analysis was done with two-tailed Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test where indicated, with statistical significance determined at p<0.05. Input-output curves were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with repeated measures followed with Tukey HSD multiple comparisons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!