The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using abi 7500 fast qpcr system

1

Quantification of Mitochondrial DNA and Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) and reverse transcribed using the SuperScript IV VILO Master Mix (Life Technologies). cDNA was amplified via the Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Life Technologies) using the ABI 7500 Fast qPCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Results were analysed using the ABI 7500 software v2.0.6. Relative expression levels of target genes were determined by normalisation to the β-actin gene using the ΔΔCt method.
For quantification of mitochondrial DNA, mtDNA was isolated from HME cells using the Mitochondrial DNA Isolation Kit (Abcam; ab65321). Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from HME cells using a gDNA purification kit (Thermo Scientific). qPCR was performed using the ABI 7500 Fast qPCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and results were analysed using the ABI 7500 software v2.0.6. Relative expression levels of the mitochondrial genes tRNALeu(UUR) and 16S rRNA were determined by normalisation to the nuclear gene β2-microglobulin using the ΔΔCt method as previously described.17 (link),18 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Liver RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from liver tissue was isolated using RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The concentration and quality of the purified total RNA were determined spectrophotometrically at OD260 nm and by the OD260/280 ratio, respectively. Synthesis of single-stranded cDNA was carried out on 0.5 μg RNA using iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA) following a standard protocol. PCR primers were designed using Primer Express Software version 2.0, a program especially provided for primer design using ABI qPCR machines. qPCR assay on the basis of SYBR Green I technology was performed with ABI 7500 fast qPCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). For each pair of primers, a dissociation curve analysis was conducted to validate the specificity of the PCR amplification. Primers were used at a concentration of 100 mmol/L in qPCR analyses and the sequences are listed in Table S1. We calculated relative changes employing the comparative method using Tfiib as the reference gene and controls as calibrators as indicated in the figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of Phage-Infected P. aeruginosa Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs were extracted from phage-infected P. aeruginosa cultures using the hot acid-phenol method [35 (link)]. Genomic DNA contamination was removed by using rigorous treatment with RNAse-free Turbo DNaseI kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), following manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of RNAs was determined using the NanoDrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and their quality was checked on an agarose gel (2%). RNAs were converted to cDNA by the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kits (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Quantitative PCR reactions were carried out using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix™ 335 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in an ABI 7500 Fast Q-PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). All primers used in this study were designed with Primer3 plus software (Supplementary Table S2) and were chemically synthesized and purified by Eurogentec (Liège, Belgium). The mRNAs expression levels were normalized on 16 S rRNA threshold cycle (Ct) values and calculated by comparing the Ct of targeted genes with those of control sample groups. The relative quantification data were determined with the 2−ΔΔCt method using Microsoft Excel-based spreadsheet.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative PCR for Plasmid Standards

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The recombinant plasmid standard was serially diluted to a range from 5 to 5×106 copies per microliter. Two µl of each dilution were utilized for qPCR assay on an ABI 7500 Fast qPCR system with 2.0.1 version software (Applied Biosystems, USA). The reaction mix (20 µl) contained 2 µl genomic DNA, 0.6 µM of primers VP28–140F and VP28–140R (Table 1), and 10 µl Maxima SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (2×) (Fermentas, MBI). The thermal cycle program was described as follows: 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 60°C for 60 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative PCR Protocol for Targeted Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All clinical samples and plasmid standards were run in triplicate following manufacturer recommendation of the ABI7500 Fast qPCR System (Applied Biosystems, Inc Foster, CA). The qPCR was performed according to the conditions (Table 1). Quantification of each target gene copy numbers was obtained by comparison with standard curves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cells using Trizol (15596-026, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quantity and quality were measured by NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Complementary DNAs (cDNAs) were synthesized using 0.5 mg of total RNA, oligo(dT)12–18 primers, and a ReverTra Ace qPCR RT kit (FSQ-101, Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Gene expression was detected by qPCR using the cDNAs, THUNDERBIRD SYBR qPCR mix reagents (QPS-201, Toyobo, Osaka, Japan), and gene-specific oligonucleotide primers (listed in Supplementary Table S2) with an ABI 7500 fast qPCR system (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The expression level of β-actin was used to normalize the relative abundance of RNAs. Significance was determined by taking the average of the β-actin-normalized 2−ΔΔCT values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Extraction and Quantification for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from bacterial cultures by the hot acid-phenol method as previously described (Bouffartigues et al., 2012 (link)) and tested by PCR for the absence of contaminating DNA using the primers pair FcfrX/RcfrX (Supplementary Table S4). The RNA concentration, the protein and solvent contaminations were determined by measuring the absorbance at 260, 280, and 230 nm, respectively. Total RNA quality was checked on a 2% agarose gel/1X-TAE electrophoresis buffer prior to use for cDNA synthesis. The mRNAs of interest were quantified by real-time PCR amplification of their cDNAs. Each primers pair was validated by verifying that the PCR efficiency was above 0.90, and that a single PCR product with the expected Tm was obtained. PCR were performed on cDNAs at least in triplicate and carried out in SYBR Green PCR Master MixTM (Applied Biosystems), with 300 nM of each primer (ABI 7500 Fast Q-PCR system, Applied Biosystems). The cDNA-generated signals were internally corrected with the 16S rRNA cDNA signal. The mRNA expression level was calculated by comparing threshold cycle (Ct) of target genes with control sample group and the relative quantification (RQ) data was determined with the 2–ΔΔCt method using the RQ manager v1.2.1 and the Microsoft-excel based softwares (Muller et al., 2002 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Spinal Dorsal Horn RNA Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from the spinal dorsal horn of the ipsilateral or contralateral L4–L6 segments washed by RNase-Free water was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The RNA was then quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The cDNA was synthesized using a PrimeScriptTM RT reagent Kit with gRNA (Takara, Japan). Gene level was evaluated using the SYBR green PCR master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) in an ABI 7500 Fast qPCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA) according to manufacture instruction. Primers of targeting genes were synthesized (TREM2 (sense primer: 5′-GGA ACC GTC ACC ATC ACT CT-3′, antisense primer: 5′-ATG CTG GCT GCA AGA AAC TT-3′); TNF-α (sense primer: 5′-GTG GAA CTG GCA GAA GAG GC-3′, antisense primer: 5′-AGA CAG AAG AGC GTG GTG GC-3′); IL-1β (sense primer: 5′-CTG TGT CTT TCC CGT GGA CC-3′, antisense primer: 5′-CAG CTC ATA TGG GTC CGA CA-3′); IL-6 (sense primer: 5′-TTC CAT CCA GTT GCC TTC TT-3′, antisense primer: 5′-CAG AAT TGC CAT TGC ACA AC-3′); GAPDH (sense primer: 5′-AGT GTT TCC TCG TCC CGT AGA-3′, antisense primer: 5′-TTG CCG TGA GTG GAG TCA TAC-3′)). The GAPDH, a housekeeping gene, was used as control. Results were normalized to GAPDH and examined using the comparative CT method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Gene Expression via RT-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from 80%‐confluent cells using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with on‐column DNase digestion (RNase‐Free DNase Set, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). 4 μg of RNA was then used for cDNA preparation using the High‐Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Real‐time PCR was performed using TaqMan Universal Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with primer‐appropriate Universal ProbeLibrary probes (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and the ABI 7500 FAST qPCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). CASC3 gene was used as a normalising control. Gene expression is shown relative to control cell levels. Primers (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) used in this study are provided in Table EV6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Gene Expression Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from cells (70–80% confluence) using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with on-column DNase digestion (RNase-Free DNase Set, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). cDNA was prepared from 4 µg RNA using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Real-time PCR was performed using TaqMan Universal Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with primer-appropriate Universal ProbeLibrary probes (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and the ABI 7500 FAST qPCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Gene expression was normalised to the reference CASC3 gene, and is shown relative to levels in control cells. A list of the primers (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) used in this study is provided in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!