The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6200 calorimeter

Manufactured by Parr
Sourced in United States, Israel

The Parr 6200 calorimeter is a high-precision instrument designed for measuring the heat of reaction or heat of combustion of various materials. It is capable of accurately determining the energy content of solid, liquid, or gaseous samples. The calorimeter operates by monitoring the temperature change within a reaction vessel as the sample undergoes a controlled reaction.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using 6200 calorimeter

1

Proximate Composition Analysis of Feed and Fish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The composition of experiment feed and fish body was analysed according to the methods described by AOAC [24 ]: dry matter was obtained in an oven at 105°C; crude protein content of feed and fish body was determined by the Kjeldahl method (N × 6.25); crude lipid of feed, fish body, and fish liver was extracted with diethyl ether; gross energy of different feed was measured using oxygen bomb calorimeter (6200 Calorimeter, Parr Instrument Company Moline, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Calorimetric Analysis of Propellant Explosions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The heat of
explosion of the propellant and its combination with inhibitors was
assessed using a Parr 6200 calorimeter. The tester diagram is shown
in Figure S2 in Supporting Information.
Each inhibitor sample was placed at the bottom of the crucible and
weighed with 3 wt % of propellant grains. The tubular propellants
grains were sliced into sheets with a diameter of approximately 1
mm, and each crucible contained 5.5 g of the sheets. The loading mass
of each combination of propellant and inhibitor was 5.5 + 0.165 g.
Then, the crucible was placed in the bomb calorimeter, which would
be filled with 3.0 MPa nitrogen. Subsequently, the propellant samples
were initiated by a nichrome wire and raised to the temperature of
water in an adiabatic sleeve. Finally, according to the change in
temperature of water, the heat of explosion of propellant could be
calculated as follows where Q (J/g) and Qf (J/g) are the heat of explosion of propellant
and heat released by the fuse, respectively; mw (g) is the mass of water in each test; cw (J/(g·°C)) is the heat capacity of water;
ΔTW is the temperature rising value
of water; mp (g) is the loading mass of
propellant grains; Furthermore, the initial temperature of deionized
water was 25 to 28 °C. The room temperature was 30 °C. For
each propellant composition, two samples were tested.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Calorimetric Analysis of Fibrous Pellets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calorimetric experiments were
performed using a Parr 6200 calorimeter. The fibrous pellets were
prepared using a Specac GS 15011 manual hydraulic press, and the samples
were then sealed in a steel crucible for examination. All experiments
were performed under an air atmosphere at 30 bar from 20 to 500 °C
at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Calorimetric Analysis of Faecal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Faecal calorific values were measured by fully combusting 0.5 – 0.7 g of dried material in pure oxygen using a Parr 6200 Calorimeter. The heat released by the material after oxidation determined the calorific value. Samples were oven-dried at 105 °C and ground into pellet/powder form prior to testing the calorific content with the results presented on a dry basis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analytical Methods for Feed Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dry matter was determined by drying samples at 105°C to constant weight (AOAC 1990; 925.10) . Crude protein (N x 6.25) concentration in the samples was determined by the dry combustion method, using a Leco Leco Corp., St. Joseph, MI) . Oil (as ether extract) was extracted with diethyl ether by the extraction method (AOAC 2000) , employing a Soxtec system (Foss UK Ltd). Gross energy of the samples was measured using a Parr adiabatic bomb calorimeter (Parr-6200 Calorimeter, Parr Instruments Company, Moline, IL, USA), and benzoic acid was used as the standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Biochemical Analysis of Food and Fecal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Food and partially dried fecal samples were analyzed in duplicate for moisture (AOAC 930.15), ash (AOAC 942.05), fat by acid hydrolysis and hexane extraction (AOAC 960.39), gross energy (Parr 6200 Calorimeter, Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL), and total dietary fiber (AOAC 991.43). Crude protein was determined by Dumas combustion (AOAC 990.03) using a nitrogen analyzer (FP928, LECO Corporation, Saint Joseph, MI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fecal Energy Density Analysis for Weight Loss

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fecal samples were collected at baseline and each timepoint post-MBS and stored at −80°C until analysis. Fecal sample energy density was measured via bomb calorimetry using the Parr 6200 Calorimeter with a Parr 6510 water handling system (PARR Instrument Co, Moline, IL, USA). Intestinal energy harvest is estimated using relative energy content (REC), which is calculated using the number of calories in a fecal sample (obtained from bomb calorimetry) divided by the total energy intake by the patient the previous day (obtained from ASA24 dietary questionnaire). Higher fecal REC indicates that less energy was absorbed in the intestine, thus potentially contributing to more weight loss.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Biochemical Analysis of Food and Fecal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Food and partially dried fecal samples were analyzed in duplicate for moisture (AOAC 930.15), ash (AOAC 942.05), fat by acid hydrolysis and hexane extraction (AOAC 960.39), gross energy (Parr 6200 Calorimeter, Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL), and total dietary fiber (AOAC 991.43). Crude protein was determined by Dumas combustion (AOAC 990.03) using a nitrogen analyzer (FP928, LECO Corporation, Saint Joseph, MI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Digestibility Study using Chromic Oxide Indicator

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A digestibility study was conducted using 3% chromic oxide (Cr2O3) as an indicator and observed during the last week of two periods (during weeks 3 and 6 of the experiment). On day 14, four birds from each group were moved to individual cage for digestibility study. The chickens were fed experimental diets mixed with Cr2O3. Feces from each replication were collected over a 24 h period on day 21. All feed and fecal samples were stored immediately at −20°C until analysis. The procedure was repeated on day 35 and feces were collected on day 42. All samples were finely ground and analyzed for gross energy using a bomb calorimeter (Parr 6200 calorimeter; Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL, USA). The concentration of Cr2O3 in the feed and feces was determined by the method described by Fenton and Fenton [22 (link)]. The nutrient digestibility was calculated according to the following equation:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proximate Analysis of Cereal Flours

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The methods described in the Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) International [20 ] were used to determine the amount of moisture in all the CFs (AOAC Method No. 925.10, slightly modified by drying the samples at 108 °C overnight for approximately 16 h). Crude protein (N × 6.25) was determined by the Kjeldahl method (AOAC Method No. 978.04). Crude fat was determined by exhaustively extracting a known weight of each CF in petroleum ether (boiling point, 4060 °C) in a Soxhlet extractor (AOAC Method No. 930.09). Ash was determined by incineration (550 °C) of known weights of each CF in a muffle furnace (AOAC Method No. 930.05). Crude fiber was determined by the enzymatic-gravimetric method (AOAC Method No. 930.10). The carbohydrate content was determined by difference (i.e., by subtracting the sum of all the percentages of moisture, fat, crude protein, ash, and crude fiber from 100%). A bomb calorimetry (Parr 6200 calorimeter, Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL, USA) method was used to measure the energy content of the CFs [20 ]. All the analysis was done on two independent replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!