The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultra dry energy dispersive spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in Japan

The Ultra Dry energy dispersive spectrometer is a laboratory instrument designed for elemental analysis. It utilizes X-ray technology to detect and quantify the elements present in a sample. The core function of this device is to provide accurate and reliable elemental composition data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

2 protocols using ultra dry energy dispersive spectrometer

1

Characterization of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The first experimental group received MWCNTs (MWCNT-1) with a diameter of 8–10 nm and specific surface of 400 m2/g, and the coexisting impurities in its structure were 0.6% Fe, 0.3% Co and 0.9% Al. Open field testing data obtained for MWCNT-1 by our group has previously been published (12 (link)). The second experimental group received MWCNTs (MWCNT-2) with a diameter of 18–20 nm and specific surface of 130 m2/g, and the coexisting impurities were 0.2% Fe, 0.12% Co, 0,004% Ca and 0.08% Cl in its structure. The two types of MWCNT represented aggregates with sizes from 5–100 µm.
Characterization of the materials and their structure was performed using an S-3400N scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and Ultra Dry energy dispersive spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Metal impurities were assessed using X-ray fluorescence analysis (XrFA). The wave dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer ARL Advant'x 3600 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to conduct the XrFA of the MWCNTs. Instrumental control was possible with the use of OXSAS software, version 1.5.
The S-3400N scanning electron microscope and the Ultra Dry spectrometer were used for assessment of the nanotube aggregates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microscopic Particle Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The processed samples were individually placed on a microscope slide. They were examined within one hour on an AxioScope A1 light microscope (Zeiss, Germany) using an AxioCam 3 digital video camera (Zeiss, Germany). The length and width of each particle were measured using the Axio Vision 4.2 program (Zeiss; Oberkochen, Germany). Their morphologies were evaluated by SEM using a Hitachi S-3400N (Hitachi; Tokyo, Japan) with an ultra-dry energy dispersive spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) or with a tabletop SEM TM1000 (Hitachi; Tokyo, Japan). When examined under the S-3400N microscope, the samples were sprayed with platinum; they remained unsprayed when using the TM1000. The definitions of morphotypes as well as the descriptions of phytoliths and other unidentified mineral particles were carried out according to the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature 1.0 (Madella et al., 2005) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!