The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Acid phosphatase assay

Manufactured by Merck Group

The Acid phosphatase assay is a laboratory test used to measure the activity of the enzyme acid phosphatase in a given sample. Acid phosphatase is an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of phosphate esters under acidic conditions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using acid phosphatase assay

1

Fragaria-derived EPDENs Protect ADMSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ADMSCs were pretreated with Fragaria-derived EPDENs (0.5–1–2 μg/mL) for 24 h followed by 400 µM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) exposure for 24 h. The H2O2 concentration that caused the inhibition of 50% cell viability (IC50) was determined from the dose–response curve ranging from 0 to 1000 µM H2O2. Cell viability was evaluated using the acid phosphatase assay (Sigma-Aldrich), as previously described [12 (link)]. Optical density was read at 405 nm using a microplate reader. Data were reported as cell survival with respect to untreated cells (set = 100%).
ROS were detected by the 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin (DCFH) method. Briefly, ADMSCs were pretreated with EPDENs (0.5 µg/mL) for 24 h followed by 600 μM H2O2 exposure for 1 h. The H2O2 concentration that significantly increased ROS production was determined from a dose–response curve ranging from 0 to 800 µM H2O2. ADMSCs were washed and then incubated with 10 μM 5- and 6-carboxy-2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (CM-H2DCFDA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Monza, Italy) for 5 min at 37 °C. The fluorescent signal of DCF obtained from the conversion of 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin-diacetate (DCFH-DA) by the intracellular ROS produced was read at 485–535 nm using a microplate reader (Tecan Infinite F200pro). The results were expressed as the mean of the relative fluorescence units (RFUs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating HUVEC Cell Viability with OS-derived EVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell viability was evaluated by the acid phosphatase assay (Sigma-Aldrich). HUVEC cells were seeded in 96-well, flat-bottom tissue culture plates coated with 0.2% gelatin in water at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well in Endothelial Cell Growth Medium plus Endothelial Cell Growth Supplement. After 24 h, cells were treated with 2–6 μg/w of OS-derived EVs (pH 6.5 or 7.4) or PBS (control), in the presence of Endothelial Cell Growth Medium + 1% FDE. At 48 h, the cells were washed and incubated at 37 °C with 100 μL of buffer containing 0.1 M sodium acetate pH 5.0, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 5 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate. After 2 h, the reaction was stopped with the addition of 10 μL of 1 N NaOH, and color development was assayed at 405 nm using a microplate reader (Tecan Infinite F200pro, Männedorf, Switzerland). Data are reported as cell survival in respect to untreated cells (set = 1). The experiment was performed three times in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lysosomal Isolation from Rat Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male Wistar rats were fasted for 48 h before euthanasia for lysosomal isolation. Lysosomes were isolated using the lysosome isolation kit (Sigma-Aldrich) in a Optiprep density gradient, following step by step the instructions of the technical bulletin. In all cases 6 franctions were isolated after ultracentrifugation of the liver tissue and the acid phosphatase assay (sigma-aldrich) was performed to access the fractions positive for lysosomes. From each sample 2 fractions were isolated that were enriched in acid phosphatase. Samples of the homogenate and and lysosomal fractions, containing 100 ug of protein, were denatured in sample buffer and runned in SDS-PAGE.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!