The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using multiquant software version 3

1

LC-MS/MS Quantification Method Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC–MS/MS instrument consisted of a binary ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system, with two LC‐30 AD pumps, a SIL30‐ACmp autosampler, a CTO‐20 AC column oven and a DGU‐20A5R degasser, all from Shimadzu. A triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, AB SCIEX quadrupole linear ion trap (QTRAP®5500, Ontario, Canada), was coupled to the LC system with a Turbo V™ TurboIonSpray® source and was equipped with an inlet valve. The LC system and mass spectrometer were controlled and data were collected using Analyst® software version 1.6.2 (Sciex, Ontario, Canada). Quantitative data processing was done using the MultiQuant™ software version 3.0.1 (Sciex, Ontario, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

LC-MS/MS Analysis of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS/MS system consisted of an HPLC apparatus (Shimadzu LC-20AB, SIL-20AC HT, CTO-20AC, CBM-20A, Duisburg, Germany) and an API 4000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Sciex, Darmstadt, Germany). The substance-specific parameters used for multiple-reaction-monitoring (MRM) measurement are listed in Online Resource 2. The following source parameters were applied: ion spray voltage (ESI+), 5500 V; temperature, 550 °C; nebulizer gas, 50 psi; heating gas, 60 psi; curtain gas, 30 psi; and collision gas (nitrogen), level 9. A Synergi™ Polar-RP (150 × 2 mm, 4 μm; Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) was used as an analytical column protected by a guard column. The binary linear gradient consisted of eluent A (deionized water containing 5 mmol/L ammonium formate, 0.1% formic acid) and eluent B (LC-MS-grade methanol, 5 mmol/L ammonium formate, 0.1% formic acid) with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min: 0 min 10% B, 10 min 40% B, and 26 min 100% B. The column was equilibrated at starting conditions for 6 min prior to each run. Analyst (Version 1.6.2) and MultiQuant software (Version 3.0.1), both provided by Sciex (Darmstadt, Germany), were used for data acquisition and processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Simultaneous Quantification of Drugs in Maternal Urine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forty-six drugs were quantified in maternal urine by LC-MS/MS in a CAP and CLIA certified laboratory. Supplemental Table 2 shows the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for 46 drugs analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Drugs levels greater than lower limit of quantification are reported as detected. The drugs and their conjugates were extracted from urine using a Hamilton Robotics MicroSTARlet paired with a Tecan SP IP8 automated SPE (solid phase extraction) processor. Urine samples were hydrolyzed with β-glucuronidase enzyme to obtain free (non-conjugated) drugs in the presence of the stable-labeled internal standards for each analyte, and solid phase extraction was then performed. The drugs were detected and quantified by LC-MS/MS with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). All samples were analyzed with the LC20AD HPLC system (Shimadzu) coupled to the SCIEX QTRAP 4500 mass spectrometer (Sciex, Concord, Canada). Data acquisition on the mass spectrometer was controlled by Analyst 1.6.2 software (Sciex, Concord, Canada). Data processing and quantification were performed with MultiQuant software version 3.0 (Sciex, Concord, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Analysis of Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During sample pretreatment a vortexer (IKA ® -Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Staufen, Germany), centrifuges (5424 and 5810R, both from Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), an Evaporator ® (Liebsch Labortechnik, Bielefeld, Germany), a 16-fold vacuum manifold (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Weilmünster, Germany) and manometer (Ashcroft Instruments, Baesweiler, Germany), glass pipettes for single use (Brand, Wertheim, Germany) and Chromabond C18 SPE-cartridges, 3 mL, 500 mg (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Weilmünster, Germany) were used.
For the chromatographic separation, an Agilent 1200 LC system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) consisting of a binary pump (G1312B), a thermostated column compartment (G1316B) and a CTC PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland) were employed. Mass spectrometric detection was performed using a hybrid quadrupole-ion trap tandem mass spectrometer, 5500 QTrap (Sciex, Darmstadt, Germany) equipped with an electrospray ion-source (ESI). Nitrogen in the required purity for the mass spectrometer was produced by the nitrogen generator NGM 11 S (cmc Instruments, Eschborn, Germany). Instrument was operated by the Analyst Software Version 1.6.2 (Sciex, Darmstadt, Germany).
Quantification of the analytes was carried out using Multiquant software version 3.0 (Sciex, Darmstadt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Automated LC-MS/MS Metabolomic Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analyses were carried out on a Shimadzu Nexera LC-30AD liquid chromatograph, consisting of a SIL-30AC auto sampler, CTO-20AC column oven and CBM-20A communications bus module (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), coupled to a QTRAP 6500+ triple quad MS detector equipped with an IonDrive Turbo V Source ( Sciex; Warrington, Cheshire, UK). Data acquisition and evaluation were performed with the Analyst software version 1.7.1 and MultiQuant software version 3.0.3, respectively(Sciex; Warrington, Cheshire, UK). Automated SPE clean-up was performed using SPE-03 PromoChrom 8-Channel High Volume Automated SPE system (PromoChrom Technologies, Richmond, BC, Canada). Sample evaporation was carried out by TurboVap II (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden). MicroCen MR Eppendorf centrifuge was obtained from Herolab GmbH (Wiesloch, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multivariate Data Analysis Software

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyst software version 1.6.3 and MultiQuant software version 3.0.3 (Sciex, Darmstadt, Germany) were applied for data acquisition and evaluation. Furthermore, Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft Co., Redmond, WA, USA) and custom software developed in Node.JS (Linux Foundation, San Francisco, CA, USA) were used for data processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Targeted Metabolite Quantification with Peak View and MultiQuant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Targeted metabolomics data were processed using Peak View 2.1 and MultiQuant software version 3.0.2 (SCIEX). Chromatographic peaks of targeted metabolites were annotated using the extract ion chromatogram lists on the basis of high‐accuracy MS, MS/MS fragmentation, isotopic distribution, and retention time compared with an in‐house library of 635 metabolite standards (IROA Technologies, Bolton, MA). In addition to the IROA database, the fragmentation spectra of all peaks were searched through Metlin and HMDB. Each identified metabolite was quantified by integrating peak area using MultiQuant software. The quantitative analysis was based on the total peak areas of extracted ion chromatograms of feature ions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Biogenic Amines Quantification in Microdialysate and Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biogenic amines were analyzed in microdialysate and plasma samples of experiment on days 1 and 8 according to a previously described method.23 Samples were randomized and amino acids and amines were derivatized by an Accq‐tag derivatization strategy. Plasma samples (5 μL) were reduced with tris(2‐carboxyethyl)phosphine and deproteinated by MeOH. Microdialysate samples (30 μL) were only reduced with tris(2‐carboxyethyl)phosphine. The samples were dried under vacuum while centrifuged (9400 g, 10 minutes, room temperature), and reconstituted in borate buffer (pH 8.8) with 6‐aminoquinolyl‐N‐hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate derivatization reagent. The reaction mixtures were injected (1 μL) into an ultraperformance liquid chromatography‐tandem MS system, consisting of an Agilent 1290 Infinity II LC system, an Accq‐Tag Ultra column, and a Sciex Qtrap 6500 MS. The peaks were assigned using Sciex MultiQuant software version 3.0.2, integrated, normalized for their internal standards, and corrected for background signal. Only compounds with a QC relative SD under 30% were reported to assure the quality of the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Untargeted Metabolomics Data Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data was processed during analysis using a previously established method22 (link). Briefly, untargeted metabolomics data was processed using Peak View 2.1 and MultiQuant software version 3.0.2 (SCIEX). The acquired mass data were analyzed using PeakView with XIC Manager 1.2.0 (Sciex, Framingham, MA) for peak picking, retention time correction, and peak alignment. Metabolite identities were assigned by matching accurate mass (error < 10 ppm), retention time (error < 10%), MS/MS fragmentation (library score > 70), and isotope distribution (error < 20%) with an in-house library consisting of IROA standards (IROA Technology, Bolton, MA) and other commercially available standards (650 total). In addition to the IROA database, the fragmentation spectra of all peaks were verified with data from Metlin and HMDB. Only one missing value was observed in the human samples, which was dropped after verification of the peak intensity below the limit of quantitation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!