The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Formvar and carbon

Sourced in United States

Formvar and carbon are materials used in the preparation of specimens for electron microscopy. Formvar is a transparent, plastic-like material that forms thin films, while carbon is a conductive material that can be deposited onto specimens to enhance their electron density and improve imaging quality. These materials are commonly used to support and stabilize samples for analysis in electron microscopes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using formvar and carbon

1

Negative Stain Electron Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all negative stain specimens, copper 200-mesh grids coated with Formvar and carbon (Electron Microscopy Sciences or Ted Pella, Redding, CA) were glow discharged for 20–45 s in a vacuum chamber at 30mA. 3.5 μL sample was then applied to the grid for 35–45 s and excess sample was wicked away using filter paper. Grids were then immediately washed 2–4× for 5 s with 30 μL water droplets, then once with 1% uranyl acetate (UA) on parafilm. Excess water/UA was wicked away and then a final droplet of UA was applied for 30 s. Excess UA was wicked away and grids were air dried for 30–60 s. Imaging was performed using either an FEI T12, FEI Tecnai Spirit microscope operated at 120 kV equipped with a Gatan Orius SC200B CCD camera or JEOL 1400 electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Copper Phosphide Nanocrystal Synthesis and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample grid preparation involved preparing a dilute
Cu3–xP nanocrystal solution by
the addition of 10 μL of toluene stock solution (∼2.1
μmol Cu) to 790 μL of toluene/THF (39/40 by volume). 10
μL of this dilute Cu3–xP
nanocrystal solution was drop-cast onto a 100 mesh copper grid coated
with Formvar and carbon (Electron Microscopy Sciences). The copper
grid was suspended in air with reverse action tweezers to allow the
entire 10 μL droplet to evaporate directly from the grid. Imaging
was performed on the same day as grid preparation to avoid particle
oxidation. Images were collected on a FEI Tecnai Spirit operating
at 120 kV. The lateral dimension was taken to be the longest line
that could be drawn along the two-dimensional projection of a nanoplatelet.
The size distributions were derived from the analysis of 150 nanocrystals
with the use of 13(√150 + 1) constant-width bins spanning the
ensemble range.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Extracellular Vesicle Characterization in Stroke Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EVs isolated from 2 healthy donor individuals and from two CVA patients were assessed for EV protein markers using ExoCheck™ arrays (System Biosciences, CA, USA, EXORAY210A-8) (Figure S1). Additionally, isolated extracellular vesicles from all patients and healthy donors were analyzed for size through the nCS1TM Nanoparticle Analyzer System (Spectradyne, CA, USA) for verification of EV sizes and concentrations (Figure S1).
Further characterization of extracellular vesicles was performed through transmission electron microscopy (Figure S1). For each sample, 8 µL was applied to a copper mesh grid coated with formvar and carbon (Electron Microscopy Sciences, PA, USA) for 2 min and then gently blotted off with a piece of Whatman filter paper. The grids were rinsed with transfers between 2 drops of MilliQ water, blotting between each transfer. Finally, the grids were stained with 2 drops of a 0.75% uranyl formate solution—a quick rinse with the first drop followed by 20 s of staining in the second drop. After blotting, the grids were allowed to dry for at least 10 min. Samples were imaged on an FEI Tecnai G2 Biotwin TEM (ThermoFisher, OR, USA) at 80 kV with an AMT side-mount digital camera (AMT Imaging, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Negative Staining for Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBS containing 50 mM DTT (5 μl) was pipetted directly onto a freshly glow-discharged copper grid that had been coated with formvar and carbon (Electron Microscopy Sciences); the PBS was then blotted off with Whatman #1 filter paper. Next, 5 μl of particle preparation, the plasma membrane preparation, or PBS alone was pipetted onto the grid and allowed to adsorb for 1 min before blotting off with filter paper. Next, 5 μl of 2% uranyl acetate was pipetted onto the grid and blotted off, followed by another 5 μl of 2% uranyl acetate, which was allowed to incubate for 1 min before being blotted off. Grids were imaged using an FEI Tecnai T12 set to 120 kV accelerating voltage equipped with a Gatan 2k × 2 k CCD detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Negative Staining for TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Copper 200-mesh grids coated with formvar and carbon (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) were discharged for 30s in a vacuum chamber. Grids were incubated with 3.5μL purified protein (0.5mg/mL) for 45s and excess sample was wicked away. Grids were then immediately washed twice with 30uL water for 5 s and once with 15μL 1% uranyl acetate (UA) for 5s. Excess UA was wicked away and the grids were stained with 15μL 1% UA for 30s. Excess UA was wicked away and grids were air-dried. The grids were imaged using a FEI Tecnai T12 Transmission Electron Microscope operated at 120kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunogold Labeling for TEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Copper 200-mesh grids coated with formvar and carbon (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) were discharged for 30s in a vacuum chamber. PNMA2 purified protein (0.1mg/mL, 3.5μL) was loaded onto the grid and incubated for 45s. Grids were washed twice with 30uL diH2O for 30s and blocked with 30uL 1% BSA for 30mins. Grids were then incubated with sera/CSF/primary antibody in 30uL 1% BSA for 1h at room temperature and then washed three times with 30uL 1% BSA for 30s. Grids were then incubated with 6 nm immunogold conjugated secondary antibody, including Goat-anti-Human IgG (H&L) and Goat-anti-Mouse IgG (H&L) (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) (1:20 dilution in 1% BSA, 30uL) for 1h at room temperature. Afterwards, grids were washed three times with 30uL PBS for 30s and fixed with 30uL 2% glutaraldehyde for 5mins. Finally, grids were washed with 30uL diH20 for three times and stained with 30uL 1% uranyl acid for 1 min. The grids were imaged using a FEI Tecnai T12 Transmission Electron Microscope operated at 120kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

TEM Imaging of SNPs Dispersions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM images were recorded with FEI Tecnai T12 G2 TWIN transmission electron microscope operating at 120 kV. Samples of SNPs dispersions were deposited on a copper 300 mesh grid, coated with Formvar and carbon (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA, USA) and dried for 5 min. Samples were then stained with 1% uranyl acetate solution. Images were taken using TemCam—F214 (Gauting, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

TEM Imaging of Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For TEM imaging, samples of protein were diluted to a concentration of 3.8 mg/mL in dialysis buffer and deposited onto a TEM grid (100 mesh copper grid coated with formvar and carbon, Electron Microscopy Sciences), and negatively stained with NanoW (Nanoprobes). They were examined in a Tecnai T-12 transmission electron microscope (FEI). The ultrastructural observations were performed with an aberration corrected FEI Titan 80–300 transmission electron microscope. The observations were made in S/TEM mode using a high angle annular dark field (HAADF) detector. The probe convergence angle was set to 18 mrad and the inner detection angle on the HAADF detector was set to 52 mrad. For high resolution TEM, samples were diluted to 70 μg/mL (Mnx complex) or 35 μg/mL (MnxEF). When protein samples were visualized in the absence of Mn, an aliquot of NanoW (Nanoprobes) was added as a negative stain. Particle sizes were measured using ImageJ software64 (link). Over 100 particles of MnxEF and over 1000 particles of Mnx complex were measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Thermal Denaturation and TEM Analysis of Oligomers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the oligomer TEM samples, thermal denaturation spin‐down assays were run using citrate synthase. 100 μl of 3.8 μM protein and 7.6 μM ssDNA were thermally denatured together at 60°C for 15 min in 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5 buffer. The resulting solution was then centrifuged at 16,100 g for 15 min at 4°C to separate the soluble and insoluble fractions. The soluble portion was pipetted off and transferred on ice for TEM analysis.
A positively charged copper mesh grid coated in formvar and carbon (Electron Microscopy Sciences) using the PELCO easiGlow Discharge system was used for each soluble sample. The charged copper grids had 5 μl of sample applied for 20 s and then lightly blotted off using a Whatman filter paper. The grids were then rinsed using 2 drops of MilliQ water, with filter paper blotting for each wash. Finally, the grids were then stained using two drops of a 0.75% uranyl formate solution. The first drop served as a quick wash, followed by 20 s of staining using the second drop. The grids were then blotted and allowed to dry. The TEM images were captured using a FEI Tecnai G2 Biotwin TEM at 80 kV with an AMT side‐mount digital camera. In order to better visualize the intricacies of each oligomer, the images’ contrast and brightness was uniformly enhanced using Adobe Photoshop.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!