The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using compound discoverer 3.1 cd

1

LC-MS/MS analysis of metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analysis was performed using a Q Exactive Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled to a Vanquish UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The liquid chromatography system was fitted with a Sequant ZIC-pHILIC column (150 mm × 2.1 mm) and guard column (20 mm × 2.1 mm) from Merck Millipore and temperature was maintained at 35°C. The sample (2μL) was separated at a flow rate of 0.1 mL/minute. The mobile phase was composed of 10 mM ammonium carbonate and 0.15% ammonium hydroxide in water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). A linear gradient was applied by increasing the concentration of solvent A from 20 to 80% within 22 minutes and then maintained for 7 minutes. The mass spectrometer was operated in full MS and polarity switching mode, in the range of 70-1000m/z and resolution 70000. Major ESI source settings were: spray voltage 3.5 kv, capillary temperature 275°C, sheath gas 35, auxiliary gas 5, AGC target 3e6, and maximum injection time 200 minutes. For the targeted analysis, the acquired spectra were analyzed using XCalibur Qual Browser and XCalibur Quan Browser software (Thermo Scientific). The compound discoverer 3.1 (CD) (Thermo Scientific)) was used for untargeted and novel feature detection and annotation with library scoring. Features with the fold change >2 and p <0.05 were selected as discriminating markers. Samples were analysed by quintuplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolite Profiling of Liver Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 100 mg liver samples (six replicates per group) were ground separately in liquid nitrogen, and 500 μL of precooled 80% methanol was resuspended using well vortex to homogenize. The liver samples were ice-bathed for 5 min, followed by centrifugation at 15,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were diluted with mass-spectrometry-grade water to a methanol content of 53% and then centrifuged (15,000× g, 20 min, 4 °C). Thus, the supernatants were injected into the UPLC–MS/MS system for analysis. UPLC–MS/MS analyses were conducted at Gene Denovo Ltd. (Guangzhou, China), and a Vanquish UPLC system (ThermoFisher, Berlin, Germany) and an Orbitrap Q ExactiveTM HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Berlin, Germany) were used.
The raw data files were processed using UPLC–MS/MS with Compound Discoverer 3.1 (CD3.1, Thermo Fisher) performing peak alignment, peak extraction, and quantification for each metabolite. Peak was matched to mzCloud (https://www.mzcloud.org/, accessed on 16 February 2022), mz Vault, and Mass List database to obtain accurate qualitative and relative quantitative results. We used the statistical software R (R-3.4.3 version), Python (Python version 2.7.6), and CentOS (CentOS version 6.6) for statistical analysis. A normal transformation was attempted using the area normalization method when the data were not normally distributed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolite Profiling of Storage Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each storage root sample (100 mg) was ground in liquid nitrogen and the homogenate was resuspended in 500 μL prechilled 80% methanol using vigorous vortexing. After processing, the supernatant was analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) [42 (link),43 ].
The LC–MS/MS analyses were performed using a Vanquish ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatograph (UHPLC) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with an Orbitrap Q Exactive TM HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) by Gene Denovo Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) [44 (link)]. The raw data files generated using UHPLC–MS/MS were processed using Compound Discoverer 3.1 (CD3.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific) to perform peak alignment, peak-picking, and quantification for each metabolite. The normalized data were used to predict the molecular formula based on additive ions, molecular ion peaks, and fragment ions. Peaks were matched with data in online spectral libraries (mz Cloud (https://www.mzcloud.org/, accessed on 31 May 2022); mz Vault) and the Mass List database to obtain accurate qualitative and relative quantitative results. Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software R (R version R-3.4.3), Python (Python 2.7.6 version), and CentOS (CentOS release 6.6). When data were not normally distributed, the area normalization method was applied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

LC-MS/MS analysis of metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analysis was performed using a Q Exactive Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled to a Vanquish UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The liquid chromatography system was fitted with a Sequant ZIC-pHILIC column (150 mm × 2.1 mm) and guard column (20 mm × 2.1 mm) from Merck Millipore and temperature was maintained at 35°C. The sample (2μL) was separated at a flow rate of 0.1 mL/minute. The mobile phase was composed of 10 mM ammonium carbonate and 0.15% ammonium hydroxide in water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). A linear gradient was applied by increasing the concentration of solvent A from 20 to 80% within 22 minutes and then maintained for 7 minutes. The mass spectrometer was operated in full MS and polarity switching mode, in the range of 70-1000m/z and resolution 70000. Major ESI source settings were: spray voltage 3.5 kv, capillary temperature 275°C, sheath gas 35, auxiliary gas 5, AGC target 3e6, and maximum injection time 200 minutes. For the targeted analysis, the acquired spectra were analyzed using XCalibur Qual Browser and XCalibur Quan Browser software (Thermo Scientific). The compound discoverer 3.1 (CD) (Thermo Scientific)) was used for untargeted and novel feature detection and annotation with library scoring. Features with the fold change >2 and p <0.05 were selected as discriminating markers. Samples were analysed by quintuplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolomics Data Preprocessing and Filtering

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw data for metabolomics were preprocessed, and the relevant parameters were screened by compound discoverer 3.1 (CD, Thermo Fisher, USA) library search software. Set relevant parameters for peak extraction, and the quantitative results were normalized. Finally, the quantitative results of the metabolites were obtained. Metabolites with coefficient of variation (CV) less than 30% (Wen et al., 2017 (link)) in QC samples were retained for subsequent analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!