The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jsm 5600lv sem

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan, United States

The JSM-5600LV is a low-vacuum scanning electron microscope (SEM) manufactured by JEOL. It is designed to provide high-resolution imaging and microanalysis capabilities for a wide range of samples, including those that are not entirely dry or conductive. The JSM-5600LV can operate in both high and low vacuum modes, allowing it to accommodate a variety of specimen types. Its core function is to capture detailed images and gather analytical data about the surface and composition of materials at the micro and nanoscale level.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using jsm 5600lv sem

1

Microsphere Size Characterization via Coulter Counter and SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microsphere size distribution was determined using a Multisizer 3 Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA). Histograms were created using a bin size of 0.39 µm and smoothed using central moving average with a window size of ±5 bins. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were collected using a JSM-5600LV SEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV. Prior to imaging, samples were coated with Au/Pd using a Hummer 6.2 Sputtering System (Anatech, Battle Creek, MI) to prevent surface charging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microparticle Shape Evaluation in Biomedical Applications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the effect of microparticle shape, spherical, cubic, and cylindrical microparticles were explored in this study. Spherical particles were purchased form Degradex, Phosphorex, USA, while nonspherical particles were manufactured using a micromolding technique fully described in (5 (link)). Unless otherwise stated, microparticles were made from PLGA (Resomer RG 502H; L:G, 50:50). PMMA and polystyrene microspheres were additionally investigated in some experiments. To compare microparticles with different shapes but similar size, microparticle volume was considered as the reference criterion for size. Full details of the microparticle used in the DOEs are provided in table S2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to image particles. Samples were initially coated with a thin layer of Au/Pd using a Hummer 6.2 sputtering system (Anatech, Battle Creek, MI) and then imaged using a JSM-5600LV SEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with an acceleration voltage of 5 to 10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Embryo Ultrastructure Analysis by TEM and SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transmission and scanning electron microscopy, the embryos at E9.25-E9.75 were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for at least 24 h at 4°C, and then postfixed using 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) for 1 h. For transmission electron microscopy, the embryos were postfixed with 0.5% OsO4 suspended in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) for 30 min and dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol concentrations. After passage through propylene oxide, the tissues were embedded in Epon 812. Ultrathin sections were cut, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and then observed with a transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan, JEM-1010C). For scanning electron microscopy, the specimens were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanols (50%, 70%, 90%, 99.5%, and 100%), critical-point dried with carbon dioxide using a freeze-drying device (JEOL JFD-300), mounted and then coated with gold using a sputter coater. Finally, the specimens were observed under a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-5600 LV SEM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Micromorphological Analysis of Printed Parts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The micromorphological structure of the printed parts was observed by using SEM. All samples were gold-coated with 10 mA current using JEOL JFC-1600 Auto Fine Coater machine. The images were viewed and taken under 10 – 13 kV condition under a JEOL JSM-5600LV SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Surface Roughness of PCL Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples of PCL materials and alkaline etched materials were prepared to evaluate the surface roughness. To be observed under scanning electron microscope (SEM), the samples were dehydrated with gradient graded ethanol (50%, 70%, and 90%) for 30 min and then surface metalized by sputter coating with gold. The morphology of the PCL scaffold and the cellular morphology of the adherent BMSCs were observed by JSM5600LV SEM (JEOL Ltd., USA). To be observed under confocal laser scanning microscopy, the samples were also completely dried using gradient concentration ethanol aqueous solution and then imaged by laser reflection of the sample surface and pseudocolor processing.
The water contact angle test was also employed to evaluated the PCL scaffolds with Mw: 150,000 before and after NaOH treatment, which were performed on the produced PCL film. The film were then treated with NaOH as introduced before. Contact angles of deionized water drops were recorded and calculated with Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Analytical Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OHAUS STARTER 3100 pH meter, Thermo Ultimate 3000 HPLC (600 Bar), zorbax eclips XDB‐C18 column, CHRIST ALPHA PLUS Lyophilizer, CO2 oven, RWD cell counter, laminar flow, automatic pipette sets, microplate reader spectrophotometer, JEOL JSM‐5600LV SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Surface Morphology Analysis of Dental Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surfaces of two randomly selected specimens from each group were examined under SEM (Proscan 2000, Scantron Industrial Products, UK) to investigate the surface morphology and qualitatively compare surface characteristics before and after simulated toothbrushing. The specimens were sputter coated with a 15 nm layer of Pt/ Pd to aid conductivity and examined using a Jeol JSM 5600 LV SEM (Jeol Ltd., Japan) at an operating voltage of 15 kV in the secondary electron mode. Scanning was conducted over a 3.0 mm × 3.0 mm area with an x and y step-size of 0.01 and 0.10 mm and number of steps of 400 and 30, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multimodal Characterization of Iron-Doped Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM and EDS-SEM were performed using a JSM-5600LV SEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with an acceleration voltage of 5 to 10 kV. Samples were initially coated with a thin layer of Au/Pd using a Hummer 6.2 sputtering system (Anatech, Battle Creek, MI, USA) and then imaged. EDS was performed in the dark field, and both SEM and EDS-SEM were performed at high vacuum settings. Samples for cross-sectional analysis were first frozen by liquid nitrogen and then cut under an optical microscope. Iron(II) sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4.7H2O) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and dispensed (100 ng) into 4X-core particles using a cellenONE picoliter dispenser. Nanoresolution x-ray CT reconstructs (resolution, 0.38 to 0.45 μm) were obtained at the Biotechnology Resource Center of Cornell University. NanoCT imaging was performed using a ZEISS/Xradia Versa 520 x-ray microscope. The three cross sections depicted in Fig. 1 for each particle were selected to be equidistant (50 to 60 μm apart). Reconstruction of nanoCT scans was performed with Avizo software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). All 2D image analysis including porosity measurements was performed by ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Structural Characterization of Novel Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structures of GSH-SMIP, NMIP, CLX1180, and
LX1180 were characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy
(Nicolet NEXUS 670, American Nicolet Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin).
The images of GSH-SMIP and NMIP were characterized by a scanning electron
microscope (SEM, JSM-5600LV SEM, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The mass spectrometry
analysis of GSH-SMIP was carried out using a time-of-flight mass spectrometer
(TOF, MicroTof Q II, Bruker).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Structural Characterization of Fatty Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structural characteristic of both FAs were designed with a JSM-5600 LV, SEM, (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). The samples were analyzed at increasing temperatures (200°C, 400°C, 600°C, and 1200°C) with magnifications of 5.00 KX, 2.50 KX, 2.52 KX, and 1.00 KX [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!