The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

159 protocols using asap 2010

1

Comparative Characterization of Sorbent Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 2

Two sorbents, Sorbead®LE32 and Sorbead®H, were characterized via nitrogen porosimetry using a Micromeritics ASAP® 2000 porosimetry system. The resulting data was analyzed with Micromeritics ASAP® 2010 software to determine micropore surface area and BET surface area, and is summarized in Table 2 below. Sorbead®LE32 was found to have substantially higher micropore surface area than Sorbead®H.

TABLE 2
RMA measurements
Sorbead ®LE32Sorbead ®H
BET surface area (m2/g)750774
Micropore surface area (m2/g)23240
RMA (%)315.2

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Sorbead LE32 and Sorbead H Sorbents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 2

Two sorbents, Sorbead®LE32 and Sorbead®H, were characterized via nitrogen porosimetry using a Micromeritics ASAP® 2000 porosimetry system. The resulting data was analyzed with Micromeritics ASAP® 2010 software to determine micropore surface area and BET surface area, and is summarized in Table 2 below. Sorbead®LE32 was found to have substantially higher micropore surface area than Sorbead®H.

TABLE 2
RMA measurements
Sorbead ® LE32Sorbead ® H
BET surface area (m2/g)750774
Micropore surface area 23240
(m2/g)
RMA (%)315.2

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterizing HAp-Gelatin Microspheres Surface

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Micromeritics ASAP 2010 nitrogen adsorption equipment was used to calculate the specific surface area of HAp–gelatin microspheres by measuring the nitrogen adsorption of the samples. Through the multipoint Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) technique, adsorption data in the pressure ratio (P/Po) range from 0.02 to 0.45 was used to determine the specific surface area. By employing a desorption isotherm and assuming a cylindrical pore model, the pore size distribution of the produced powders was estimated through the Barret–Joyner–Halender (BJH) technique. The average pore volume and size can be derived from the nitrogen adsorption volume at pressure ratio (P/Po) 0.972.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Porous Texture Characterization by Adsorption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Textural characterization of the samples was carried out by means of physical adsorption of N2 at −196 °C in a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 and adsorption of CO2 at 0 °C in a Micromeritics TriStar 3000. Helium density was measured in an Accupyc 1330 at 35 °C. The samples were outgassed at 100 °C under vacuum overnight prior to adsorption measurements.
The use of both adsorbates, N2 and CO2, provides complementary information about the porous texture of the samples: the adsorption of CO2 at 0 °C and up to 1 bar is restricted to pores narrower than 1 nm, whereas N2 adsorption at −196 °C covers wider pore sizes but presents diffusion limitations in the narrower pores. The total pore volume (Vp) was calculated from the amount of N2 adsorbed at a relative pressure of 0.99, and the BET surface area from the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller equation [29 (link)]. The micropore volume (W0) and the micropore surface area (SDR) were determined from the Dubinin-Radushkevich (DR) [30 (link)] and Dubinin-Astakhov (DA) [31 (link)] equations assuming a density of the adsorbed phase of 0.808 cm3·g−1 for N2 and 1.023 cm3·g−1 for CO2, a cross sectional area of 0.162 nm2 for N2 and 0.187 nm2 for CO2 and finally an affinity coefficient of 0.34 for N2 and 0.36 for CO2. The average micropore width (L0) was calculated through the Stoeckli-Ballerini equation [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of prepared nanoparticles were carried out on a JEM-1400 (JEOL, Japan) at 200 kV. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) approach (ASAP 2010, Micromeritics, USA) and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method were performed to calculate pore size distributions and surface area, respectively. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were measured by a Bruker IFS 55 spectrometer (Switzerland) using KBr pellets. The zeta potential and hydrodynamic size were determined using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern, UK). Small-angle powder X-ray diffraction patterns of the obtained materials were collected on a RINT2000 vertical goniometer (Rigaku, Japan) using Cu Kα irradiation. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was determined on a TGA-50 instrument (Shimadzu, Japan) with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen flow. The number-averaged molecular weight and the polydispersity index of DAD were determined on a WATERS 1515 equated with a series of PS gel columns, using THF as an eluent at 40 °C with a PS calibration. The concentration of DOX was evaluated with a U-5100 UV-Vis spectrophotometer at 480 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Elemental Analysis of Sulfur in ACFC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Elemental analyses (EA) were performed on Elementar Vario EL Cube elemental analyzer to determine the sulfur content in ACFC. Nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms and pore size distribution of ACFC were characterized by accelerated surface area and porosimetry system (Micromeritics, ASAP 2010). The morphology and dispersion of sulfur of composite cathodes were observed with scanning electron microscopes (SEM, JEOL, JSM-6380LA and SEM, JEOL, JSM-6330F) equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Nanoadsorbent Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Be(ii) determination was performed using a FAAS instrument model AA-680 Shimadzu (Japan) consisting an acetylene/nitrous oxide flame and a Be hollow cathode lamp with wavelength of 234.9 nm. Manufacturer's manual was used to set up the instrument. A digital 827 WTW Metrohm pH-meter composed of a combined glass-calomel electrode (Herisau, Switzerland) was employed for the pH measurements. Fourier transform infra-red (FT-IR) analysis carried out on a Bruker spectrophotometer model IFS-66. Elemental analysis of the nanoadsorbent was conducted using an EA112 flash elemental analyzer (Thermo Finnigan, Okehampton, UK). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) study was performed on a KYKY-3200 instrument (Beijing, China). Magnetic features of the nanoadsorbents were recorded on a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) (AGFM/VSM 117 3886 Kashan, Iran). A Bahr STA-503 instrument (Behrthermo, Germany) was used for thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Surface analysis was explored by nitrogen adsorption–desorption method employing a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 instrument. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was conducted on a Philips-PW 12C diffractometer (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) using Cu Kα radiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nitrogen Physisorption Analysis of MSNs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nitrogen physisorption measurements of MSNs as well as SLM-loaded MSNs were carried out on an ASAP2010 instrument (Micromeritics, USA). The samples were degassed at 40 °C for at least 12 h before analysis. The surface area was calculated using the Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) method in the relative pressure range 0.05-0.20 P/Po, the pore size distribution was analyzed using the Barett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) model, and the total pore volume was determined by the amount of nitrogen adsorbed at P/Po = 0.99.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Catalyst Characterization by ICP-AES, XRD, XRF, SEM, and BET

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) was inductively used to test the Cu and Ni contents in the prepared catalysts using a FR-T-RR-01, CURI. The phase and crystallinity of the catalysts and YC were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using X'Pert Pro PANalytical diffractometer equipped with a detector operating Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.540598 Å; 40 kV and 30 mA). The X-ray fluorescence (XRF) was used to explore the chemical composition of raw YC. The catalysts' morphology was illustrated by a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using QUANTA 200 FEI instrument at 30 kV. BET surface area was carried out by N2-adsorption at 77 K using a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Characterization of Fiber Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of fiber is observed by a SEM (Hitachi SU8010). energy-dispersive
X-ray, XRD, XPS, and IR analyses were conducted to characterize the
structure of fibers. The diameter of particles and fibers are measured
by the software Nano Measurer 1.2.5. The XRD analysis is performed
on a DX-2700 X-ray diffractometer (Haoyuan) with Cu Kα radiation.
The IR spectrum is obtained on an infrared spectrometer (American
Thermo Fisher Scientific Nicolet 6700). XPS is conducted with XPS
and a PHI5000 Versa-Probe (ULVAC-PHI). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) measurements are performed utilizing the nitrogen adsorption
with the Micromeritics ASAP 2010 instrument. Thermal analysis is conducted
on a DSC (TA Model Q600) at heating rates of 5, 10, 15, and 20 °C/min.
TG-IR analysis is performed on a thermal analyzer system (TG/DSC,
Mettler Toledo) coupled with a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer
in the nitrogen atmosphere. The impact sensitivity of samples is tested
by using an HGZ-1 impact equipment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!