The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

124 protocols using tartaric acid

1

Maternal Prolactin Modulates Pup Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All animal work was approved by the Harvard Medical School IACUC under protocol IS00003310. The experiment was modified from elsewhere81 (link). C57bl/6j mice (Jackson; 000664) were mated at 8 weeks of age. On day 7 post-partum, litters were normalized to 5 pups per dam. Pups were weighed daily until they were weaned at day 21 post-partum or they reached endpoint (20% weight loss compared to positive controls). The weight of the pups is reported as mean +/− sem. PRISM (GraphPad Prism) was used to perform two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction to compare the weight of the pups and to perform Kaplan-Meier analysis of the pup’s survival. The survival proportions are represented as a percentage +/− SE.
On day 7 post-partum dams were administered either a 0.05mg/kg, 0.5mg/kg, or 5mg/kg dose of Fc-PRL-13, 5mg/kg dose of PRL N59D, or a PBS control by subcutaneous injection once on day 7 or every other dat. Additionally, beginning on day 7 post-partum dams were administered twice-daily a 200ug dose of Bromocriptine (2mg/mL bromocriptine mesylate (Sigma; 1076501) and 2mg/mL tartaric acid (Sigma; PHR1472) dissolved in PBS and 20% ethanol) or100uL of vehicle (2mg/mL tartaric acid (Sigma; PHR1472) dissolved in PBS with 20% ethanol). Dams were dosed until all their pups reached endpoint or were weaned at day 21 post-partum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nicotine and Menthol Preference Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Treatments groups were as follows: 1. nicotine (as hydrogen bitartrate salt) 200 μg/ml (Sigma) in 2% saccharin (Sigma); 2. nicotine 200 μg/ml + 10 μg/ml L-menthol in 2% saccharin; 3. 2 mM tartaric acid (vehicle; Sigma) in 2% saccharin; 4. 2 mM tartaric acid + 10 μg/ml L-menthol in 2% saccharin. The pH of all solutions was adjusted to 7. The concentration of nicotine was based on previous studies [21 , 25 (link), 26 (link)] and menthol concentration was based on pilot studies showing no baseline preference for this concentration in acute administration, with higher menthol concentrations becoming aversive [27 ]. This concentration corresponds to a menthol to nicotine ratio similar to what is found in un-mentholated cigarettes [28 (link)]. All solutions were administered in modified glass bottles to prevent menthol decomposition in plastic, and covered with foil tape to prevent nicotine decomposition in light.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measurement of Sulfur Compounds in Wine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methanol, ethanol, acetonitrile, dichloromethane, riboflavin, citric acid, tartaric acid, boric acid, mercaptoethanol, o-phtaldehyde (OPA), amino acid multi standard (containing acidic, neutral, and basic amino acids), riboflavin (RF), d6-dimethyl sulphide (d6-DMS), isopropyl disulphide, dimethyl disulphide (DMDS), dimethyl trisulphide (DMTS), p-benzoquinone (pBQ), 3-mercaptopropanoic acid (3MPA), glutathione, trifluoroacetic acid and hydrochloric acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sodium metabisulfite was purchased from J.T. Baker (Deventer, The Netherlands). All the chemicals were of analytical grade, at least. HPLC grade water was obtained by a Milli-Q system (Millipore Filter Corp., Bedford, MA, USA).
Commercial hydrolysable tannins from chestnut wood intended for oenological use were provided by Dal Cin (Concorezzo, Italy).
The model wine solution (MW) was made of 5.0 g/L tartaric acid and 12% ethanol (v/v), adjusted to pH 3.2 with sodium hydroxide (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
The white wine (WW0) produced with Trebbiano grape in vintage 2016 was collected at a local winery just after bottling and analyzed. The concentration of Met in WW0 was 5.90 ± 0.35 mg/L and that of total SO₂ was 80 ± 2 mg/L, while no RF nor GSH were detected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying TRAP+ Osteoclasts in Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure TRAP+ osteoclasts, paraffin sections were deparaffinized and incubated in acetate-tartaric acid buffer (0.2 M sodium acetate [Merck, 6268], 50 mM tartaric acid [Sigma-Aldrich, T10-9], pH 5.0) for 20 min at 37°C and then stained in 1.1 mg/mL FAST Red TR (Sigma, F8764-16) substrate and 0.1−0.5 mg/mL napthol ASMX phosphate (Sigma, N4875) substrate. Sections were incubated for 2−4 h until sufficient red color was observed in osteoclasts, washed in PBS, and then counterstained with Methyl Green (Vector Laboratories, H-3402-500) before washing, air drying, and mounting in VectaMount permanent mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, H-50000). Masson trichrome staining was performed using the Masson Trichrome Stain Kit (SKU KTMTRLT EA, StatLab, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were obtained using a Zeiss Colibri inverted microscope at 10x and 20x dry magnification using a Zeiss 305 color camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analytical Procedures for Tannin-Rich Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methanol, ethanol, acetonitrile, riboflavin, citric acid, tartaric acid, tetrahydrofuran (THF), boric acid, mercaptoethanol, o-phtaldehyde (OPA), L-methionine, d 6 -dimethyl sulphide (d 6 -DMS), isopropyl disulphide, dimethyl disulphide (DMDS), dimethyl trisulphide (DMTS), Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and hydrochloric acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All the chemicals were of analytical grade, at least. HPLC grade water was obtained by a Milli-Q system (Millipore Filter Corp., Bedford, MA, USA).
Commercial hydrolysable tannins from nut galls, chestnut and oak woods intended for oenological use were provided by Dal Cin (Concorezzo, Italy).
The model wine contained 5.0 g/L tartaric acid and 12% ethanol (v/v), adjusted to pH 3.2 with sodium hydroxide (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC-based Phytochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acetonitrile, methanol, ethanol, chloroform, acetic acid, and formic acid were HPLC grade from VWR. Acetone was provided by Fluka. Sodium chloride, tartaric acid, epiCatechin, epigalloCatechin gallate, lithium chloride, N, N-dimethylformamide, and trifluoroacetic acid were provided by Sigma-Aldrich, sulphuric acid by Roth. Catechin, epiCatechin, epiCatechingallate, epigalloCatechin, flavanol dimer B2, flavanol trimer C1, and malvidin-3-O-glucoside chloride were purchased from Extrasynthese (Genay, France). Ultra-pure water was obtained from a Milli-Q Advantage A10 system (Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antioxidant Capacity Determination Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ethanol, Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), aluminum chloride hexahydrate, sodium nitrite, (+)-catechin, gallic acid monohydrate, sodium acetate anhydrous, potassium chloride, hydrochloric acid, sodium carbonate anhydrous, oxlalic acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, lactate, acetic acid, citric acid, succinic acid, fumaric acid, fructose, glucose, sucrose, maltose, lactose, sorbitol, gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, catechol, catechin, chlorogenic acid, epigallocatechin gallate, caffeic acid, epicatechin, syringic acid, 4-methycatechol, epicatechin gallate, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, and rutin were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analytical Standards Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acetone and methanol (MeOH) were LC/MS grade solvents (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy). Formic acid (> 95%), acetic acid glacial (99%), and ethanol (96%) were reagent grade (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy), ammonium formate solution 5 M (0.315 g/mL) (G1946-85021, Agilent Technologies). MilliQ water with a conductivity less than 18.2 MΩ, was prepared using an integrated Milli-pore purification system (MilliQ integral, Merck, Milan, Italy) .
Tartaric acid, glycerol, 2,4 toluene diisocyanate, and 2,6 toluene diisocyanate were analytical standards (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Organic Acids Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standards of organic acids used in the study were as follows: tartaric acid (> 98%), L(-)-malic acid (> 98%), shikimic acid (> 98%), L(+)-lactic acid (> 98%), citric acid (> 98%), and succinic acid (> 98%), as well as water (purity for LC/MS) and H 3 PO 4 (85%, v/v) (purity for LC/MS), methanol (HPLC grade); all were supplied from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Sep-Pak C18 cartridges (silica-based octadecylbonded phase with strong hydrophobicity, appropriate for organic acids in beverages) for solid-phase extraction (Waters). All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Osteoclast Identification by TRAP Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Osteoclasts were detected by TRAP staining. 5 µm thick histological slides were exposed to the TRAP solution containing N,N-dimethylformamide (EM Science), 3.7 mM of fast red violet LB di-azonium salt (Sigma), 6.4 mM of tartaric acid (Sigma), and 0.4% MgCl2 in 0.2 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) for 10 minutes at 37 °C. The slides were then washed for 30 minutes before being counter-stained with hematoxylin for 5 seconds. Osteoclasts were identified as being positively stained for TRAP and possessing a ruffled border with an underlying lacuna.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!