The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Microcl 21

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany

The MicroCL 21 is a compact centrifuge designed for quick and efficient separation of samples in microtubes. It features a high-speed motor and rotor capable of reaching up to 21,000 RPM, enabling rapid and consistent sample preparation for various laboratory applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using microcl 21

1

Extraction of Free Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freeze-dried samples were used for the extraction of free phenolic compounds according to a modified HEALTHGRAIN method (23 (link)). Precisely 250 mg of sample were weighed into a 2-mL Eppendorf safe lock tube. To each sample, 1 mL of 80% ethanol (V/V, HPLC grade; Fisher Chemical, Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA) was added, vortexed for 0.5 min at 1500 rpm and placed into ultrasonic bath (Bandelin Electronic RK 100 H; Sonorex, Berlin, Germany) for 10 min, after which the samples were centrifuged (MicroCL 21; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 6164×g for 15 min, and the supernatant was decanted into new tubes. Extraction process was repeated two more times and the combined supernatants were evaporated under a nitrogen stream. Samples were stored at –20 °C. Prior to further analysis of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity, the samples were dissolved in 0.5 mL of methanol (HPLC ultra gradient; J.T.Baker), centrifuged at 6164×g (MicroCL 21; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and transferred into new tubes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Spectrophotometric Determination of PPO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The measurement of PPO was carried out using AACC method 22–85.01 (16 (link)) with some modifications. Sample mass was adjusted to 10 mg and the quantity of the l-DOPA (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, Steinheim, Germany) sample solution was adjusted to 0.5 mL and diluted with distilled water to a final volume of 1 mL. Afterwards, the samples were mixed on vortex (IKA® MS 3 basic shaker; IKA® Works Inc.) for 55 min at 1000 rpm and centrifuged (MicroCL 21; Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH, Dreieich, Germany) for 5 min at 6164×g prior to spectrophotometric measurement (Specord 50 Plus; Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany) at 475 nm. According to the applied method (16 (link)), activity of PPO is expressed as the absorbance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Total Soluble Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In brief, fresh root and shoot were ground with tris–HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 7.5), 2 mM EDTA and 0.04% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol. In order to separate the transparent fluid portion, the crude specimens were centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 rpm (MicroCL 21, Thermo Scientific, United States). Subsequently, 1 ml of Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) was diluted to 100 µl protein extract before measuring the absorbance at 595 nm. A bovine serum albumin (BSA) curve was modeled for estimating the total soluble protein as described by Bradford assay25 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Antioxidant Enzyme Activities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In brief, the root and shoot samples (0.1 g) were independently homogenized with 100 mM phosphate (pH 7.0) in a mortar and pestle. The homogenate was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min (MicroCL 21, Thermo Scientific, United States)., and the transparent portion was collected for analysis. We first analyzed the SOD activity by mixing the plant extract (100 µl) with 0.1 mM of EDTA, 50 mM of NaHCO3 (pH 9.8), and 0.6 mM of epinephrine32 (link). After 4 min, the adrenochrome confirmation was read at 475 in a spectrophotometer. Secondly, the plant extract (100 µl) was supplemented with 1 ml of assay solution with 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM H2O2, 0.5 mM ascorbic acid, and 50 mM phosphate33 (link). The absorbance of the mixture was then observed at 290 nm and thereafter calculated for APX activity by extinction coefficient (2.8 mM−1 cm−1). Besides, 100 µl extract was mixed up with 100 mM phosphate buffer and 6% hydrogen peroxide solution. The absorbance was read twice in 30 s interval and thereafter calculated for the activity of CAT using a coefficient of 0.036 mM−1 cm−1). Lastly, 100 mM phosphate, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM GSSG and 0.2 mM NADPH added individually to 100 μL of plant extract. The reaction was initiated by GSSG, and absorption was reduced by NADPH-oxidation at 340 nm. The calculation of GR activity was then performed by the extinction coefficient (6.12 mM−1 cm−1)34 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Cyanobacterial Toxin Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Phytoxigene™ CyanoDTec (Diagnostic Technology, Belrose, Australia) multiplex quantitative real-time PCR assay was applied to determine the gene copies of the 16s rRNA gene (total cyanobacteria) and the mcyE, cyrA, sxtA genes (microcystins, cylindrospermopsin, saxitoxins, respectively). The kit was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions and PCR was carried out in a Smartcycler II system (Cepheid). In brief, a volume of water sample (1 to 15 mL, depending on visual cell density) was filtered through a Nucleopore 25 mm, 0.8 µm filter (Whatman, Little Chalfont, UK) using a syringe and filter holder. DNA extraction of filters was carried out using BioGx bead lysis tubes (Diagnostic Technology) in a BeadBug bead beater (Benchmark Scientific). Extracts were centrifuged (MicroCL 21, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and proceeded to qPCR. Quantitation of gene copies was based on calibrations with the Phytoxigene™ CyanoNAS standards (100–1,000,000 copies per reaction).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring Cell Membrane Integrity and Death

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ultimate consequence of damage of the cell membrane integrity in both root and shoot were measured by using a conductivity meter with some modifications26 (link). Root and shoot surface components were washed with deionized water. Thereafter, the freshly harvested samples were transferred into a beaker filled with 20 ml deionized water and kept at 25 °C for 2 h. Later, the solution’s electrical conductivity (EC1) was calculated. Afterward, the samples were heated in a water bath for 20 min at 95 °C then soothed at 25 °C before recording the final electrical conductivity (EC2). The electrolyte leakage was then determined as follows: = (EC1/EC2) × 100 (%).
Evans blue was determined to account for the cell death rate with some modifications27 (link). The entire fresh root and shoot were placed into 2 mL of Evan's blue mixture for 15 min. The samples were then mixed with 80% ethyl alcohol and placed at room temperature for 10 min. Afterward, the solutions were incubated in a water bath for 15 min at 50 °C and were further centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 rpm (MicroCL 21, Thermo Scientific, United States). The supernatant was then transferred into a new centrifuge tube before measuring the absorbance at 600 nm. Eventually, the % of cell death was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!